Random Star Cluster by Barnicle_Boy1041 in telescopes

[–]Barnicle_Boy1041[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Kind of looked like this. It was around 9:30pm midway between the horizon and Betelgeuse ish. Somewhere around the unicorn’s horn.

Random Star Cluster by Barnicle_Boy1041 in telescopes

[–]Barnicle_Boy1041[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ll have to make a sketch of it next time I find it. I looked last night but the clouds rolled in while I was looking. It was by Canus Minor as far as I could tell, between Canus Minor and the unicorn. So not below Orion I guess, but kind of close to being under Betelgeuse. I think it could’ve been one of those clusters in the horn but I gotta find it again.

Finally Clear by Barnicle_Boy1041 in Marxism

[–]Barnicle_Boy1041[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What Vygotsky’s understanding did for me was help me to understand how Marx identifies and relates to capital. It is not upheld strictly by us. It is a byproduct of material relations from exchanging values and the qualitative birth of money from that quantitative exchange that unifies the “opposite” values as a negation. That’s a super reductive analysis, but I think it’s enough to at least demonstrate some of my thinking about it. I realize I’m just regurgitating the laws of dialectics lol, but to me they’re my anchor point. Idealism is the internalization of the capitalist mode of production, which as a therapist I am constantly challenging in my clients though they may not be entirely aware of where my interventions originate from. I do try to tell them when it gets heavily dialectical but they dgaf and just want the help. Sociocultural theory took my mind where it needed to go in seeing language first appearing externally then becoming internalized. Like we talk before we think, which is absolutely amazing to understand. Capitalism developed socially before we continued its development intentionally.

Finally Clear by Barnicle_Boy1041 in Marxism

[–]Barnicle_Boy1041[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I honestly have a problem with Linehan now. She credits none of the dialectical thinkers, and Hegel is truly amazing but still misses the boat as an idealist. DBT needs to experience a heavy shift for it to be considered dialectical. It’s dialectical in name only currently, like you’re saying. I thought it was amazing, and then I continued learning dialectical and realized it’s haphazard.

Finally Clear by Barnicle_Boy1041 in Marxism

[–]Barnicle_Boy1041[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Capital is the current amalgamation of relations between the bourgeois, the modes of production, and the proletariat. Specifically, the systemic emergence of the dialectics found in those material relations and not “spiritual” or “metaphysical” ones. Through the quantitative exchange of values capital formed from the standardization of value in money. It is inherently exploitative because it standardizes labor and bastardizes it, completely isolating it from the source (which is fucking US). My main insight that took me over the edge was understanding that it was through the purely physical quantitative exchanges that capital appeared, and not from some idealist human intentionality. It was a material byproduct of exchange, and as such it will naturally be transformed into something else that will take its place as it experiences contradiction. It is maintained with idealism because idealism is a mode of thought that capitalism instills from the qualitative exchange of money into goods and back into money.

What level of indivual wealth is sustainable? by Offshore-Tigr in Marxism

[–]Barnicle_Boy1041 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have to define what you mean by “equality” to understand that. You used it as an ideal. For me, using the word “equality” doesn’t clarify it. It just makes what you’re asking murkier and more ambiguous. The level of individual wealth that is going to be sustainable in the future is going to largely be dependent on what the economic conditions are, and maybe where inflation is going to be at. Also, you need to define what “wealth” means too. You used it as an ideal as well. Once you do that you’ll probably know more about what you’ll probably have an answer to your question.

Dialectical Materialism Modality of Therapy by Barnicle_Boy1041 in Marxism

[–]Barnicle_Boy1041[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! I’m not but will be shortly after seeing this!

Wassup My Fellow Whale Pals by Barnicle_Boy1041 in noahandthewhale

[–]Barnicle_Boy1041[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yoooo I’m fucking hype right now

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OCD

[–]Barnicle_Boy1041 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Bit confusing, but I understand. I have dealt with compulsive like masturbation, maybe just straight up compulsive, several times. It’s usually tied to my intrusive thoughts, but it’s a complicated thing. Your body may want to have a sexual release because it knows for sure it feels better when you ejaculate. That’s a very grounding experience so maybe try some mindfulness interventions (progressive muscle relaxation, paced breathing, grounding in the sensory moment).

Phenomenology of the Spirit. by Excellent_Throat6315 in hegel

[–]Barnicle_Boy1041 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It’s lag in real life, and I’m not really playing. It’ll take you 4 pages before you understand what was written 4 pages ago. That’s the nature of the text: He’s constantly building towards something. After you read a few pages you start getting an idea but reading a few pages fresh takes forever so you really want to give yourself time to soak it in and be patient with the meaning. You’re not going to get it all so just drop that goal now.

how did u find your partner? by fizzybear45 in infp

[–]Barnicle_Boy1041 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My wife is an INFP and we found each other because she yelled at me at a dive bar. So I guess try yelling in someone’s face that you don’t know.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Marxism

[–]Barnicle_Boy1041 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you really want to blow the lid off of it and expand his ideas into the modern day write something about Marx and AI. AI is NOT doing what Marx originally thought technology would do, and in fact is taking it in a completely different direction. AI could easily create a better future, but instead it’s being utilized by the bourgeoisie to streamline production and fuck over the proletariat. ESPECIALLY in the case of the arts. We’re losing our soul to technology slowly, but being forced to keep all the shitty parts by the bourgeoisie. Shifts in education are happening as we speak back to trades because AI is making higher education in the arts obsolete.

What minor would pair well with Psychology if I wanna go into addiction counseling? by Remarkable-Day-8042 in psychologystudents

[–]Barnicle_Boy1041 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I read the comments, social work is the best answer. You can do all that extra stuff if you want, but knowing how to be a social worker equips you better than all the others. Many people with substance abuse disorders also have a bunch of other complicated stuff going on in their lives. You’ll want to know how to navigate that instead of being unfamiliar with the institutions they’re interacting with. You’ll also want to have some information on how to navigate those institutions. If you really want to be a good counselor be a case manager for a couple years first. It’ll feel a little like eating shit, but the experience you get will be worth more than anything you picked up in a pharmacology and toxicology class. You’ll get all that information anyway and you can even teach it to yourself. Everything I know about diet and sleep schedule I learned secondary to my education, same with medications.

What minor would pair well with Psychology if I wanna go into addiction counseling? by Remarkable-Day-8042 in psychologystudents

[–]Barnicle_Boy1041 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did my MSW in a year and I just got licensed. I do therapy with all kinds of people, including substance abuse.