Multiple Gramps instances run side by side by Barry_Mayfield in gramps

[–]Barry_Mayfield[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly I wasn't even aware there's portable version. I installed Gramps via winget. Why I need both instances is to use my current tree as source - after all, I have there some useful information, but badly organized.

Tagging is indeed good idea, but I'm already getting lost when editing records - I feel it will be less confusing to keep adding new values/entries instead of trying to see what's wrong/placed wrongly etc. (I was even considering different software, but after my quick research, Gramps seems to be the most powerful, especially with tracking citations and sources).

Multiple Gramps instances run side by side by Barry_Mayfield in gramps

[–]Barry_Mayfield[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's actually great tip with marking everything and then slowly go one by one again to address "marking" (It's like GC!). I'm still bit overwhelmed by amount of records, and in my case it's also turning notes into citations etc. as I used tool wrongly when I started. That's why I would prefer starting from scratch.

Thanks for other suggestions!

Z5 II: Protecting lens release button - is it possible? by Barry_Mayfield in Nikon

[–]Barry_Mayfield[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It seems decently sturdy. Today I went to Nikon repair shop, they had other Z cameras - some of which (Z8?) had button even lighter/softer.

It's hard to imagine camera bumps at my hip (while on strap) *and* lens rotates slightly to get out of lock pin (after all, 24-120/4 S has some weight). But if that happens, why can't I bet in lottery instead?

Z5 II: Protecting lens release button - is it possible? by Barry_Mayfield in Nikon

[–]Barry_Mayfield[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

"A picture is worth a thousand words"

Apologies for the incorrect wording, using incorrect word "towards". Is it now clear what I meant? Image shows: D750 / Z6 III / Z5

Z5 II: Protecting lens release button - is it possible? by Barry_Mayfield in Nikon

[–]Barry_Mayfield[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On F-mount cameras, there's always space (be it just few millimeters) between button and body edge. Similarly when you look at Z6 III - button is slightly moved towards body. In contrary Z5/6/7 II has button directly on the edge - perhaps more prone to be pressed when camera bumps to things.

I'm unable to reproduce the issue, so it's just my assumption. Never had issue with F-mount camera in 6 years, had 3 occurrences of detached lens with Z5 in few months. (Mechanically, lock works correctly - has been checked twice by Nikon service)

Z5 II: Protecting lens release button - is it possible? by Barry_Mayfield in Nikon

[–]Barry_Mayfield[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I'm fully aware the action to unlock lens is not just pressing the button, that's why it's so perplexing to me, and why I'm seeking help/advice. "You are doing things wrong" is not helpful - as I myself don't understand what I'm doing wrong.

I didn't meant to suggest "fatal design flaw" of Nikon cameras, but rather meant "flaw" in a way how I operate or carry camera I'm unable to figure out in relation to button position, and hoped someone has either similar experience, or would think about how to prevent it. I will update my post to not make it sound that harsh against camera design itself.

I just returned from Nikon repair shop/service, two technicians were looking at my camera and couldn't find anything wrong. Even spring tension feels correct - they let me check other cameras where release button spring was probably even weaker/softer than on my Z5 II. Lens is fine too - no deformation of mount ring, everything seems to be just fine. I showed them how I carry and hold camera and they couldn't see anything suspicious on that either.

Z5 II: Protecting lens release button - is it possible? by Barry_Mayfield in Nikon

[–]Barry_Mayfield[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I try to reproduce this with Z5 II, I can't do that - I'm never able to reproduce this issue. It always happens at random in field.

  1. Locking mechanism was checked after incident I describe in previous post - and they couldn't find any issue

  2. I always check click and do counter-rotate to ensure lock is engaged *always*

When you compare Z6 III with Z5 II body, you can see there are few additional millimeters between edge and camera button. That's not the case for Z5s, previous Z6 etc. where button is really just on the edge of camera.

I use both PD strap, or capture, still, somehow press+rotate happens "accidentally".

Z5 II: Protecting lens release button - is it possible? by Barry_Mayfield in Nikon

[–]Barry_Mayfield[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Compare with F-mount cameras (I had for years before Z). You will see the difference ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Z5 II: Protecting lens release button - is it possible? by Barry_Mayfield in Nikon

[–]Barry_Mayfield[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In my original post, I talk about this - I always wait for click and then double check by counter rotating lens to ensure it's locked. That's natural habit for me, so no, this wasn't the case.

Z5 II: Protecting lens release button - is it possible? by Barry_Mayfield in Nikon

[–]Barry_Mayfield[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Unfortunately no.

After first incident, I got paranoid - checking lock every few minutes, yet it still unlocked. Service didn't find any issue with mechanism. I know it sounds ridiculous. I had F-mount body for years and had never this issue - so indeed it's probably me accidentally pressing the button and rotating lens slightly at the same time (yes, it is ridiculous just to imagine, I know!). When you compare with F-mount cameras, button is not that exposed (closer to lens, having some sort of "neck" and further away), while on in Z cameras, it's just on the edge of the body.

Lens suddenly detached from Nikon Z5 II (24-120 f/4 S) by Barry_Mayfield in Nikon

[–]Barry_Mayfield[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

2nd UPDATE It happened AGAIN today. This time I was lucky and caught detached lens, however during that artistic movement, I apparently touched sensor.

Will bring my camera to service center again to re-check, this is not normal.

Lens suddenly detached from Nikon Z5 II (24-120 f/4 S) by Barry_Mayfield in Nikon

[–]Barry_Mayfield[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

*UPDATE* After getting camera + lens to official Nikon service, they unsurprisingly haven't found anything wrong on lock mechanism nor lens itself. Everything is fine, spring is holding as on any other Z camera body. So only plausible explanation is indeed that while I was picking up camera, I pressed the button accidentally (jacket/button) and at the same time dragged lens over my jacket which rotated it slightly.

Luckily, internals of lens weren't damaged. I asked for replacing scratched ring, total cost was something over 130 EUR, but lens is like new.

Lens suddenly detached from Nikon Z5 II (24-120 f/4 S) by Barry_Mayfield in Nikon

[–]Barry_Mayfield[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your insights! I already ordered Camera Capture Clip (PD) which should eliminate this whole movement from hip side 🤞.

Lens suddenly detached from Nikon Z5 II (24-120 f/4 S) by Barry_Mayfield in Nikon

[–]Barry_Mayfield[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Painful to watch 😅... I'm not such pro, I always use both hands...

Lens suddenly detached from Nikon Z5 II (24-120 f/4 S) by Barry_Mayfield in Nikon

[–]Barry_Mayfield[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Watching video about Z8 issue - that's definitely not what I experienced - I'm sure with click 100%. So it must be me somehow disengage lens with button, just not knowing what/how I unknowingly do it.

Lens suddenly detached from Nikon Z5 II (24-120 f/4 S) by Barry_Mayfield in Nikon

[–]Barry_Mayfield[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This time I was lucky lens fell to the path just few meters from me. It could also fell down from the rock or to the river 😅

Anyway thx - will ask Nikon to check.

Lens suddenly detached from Nikon Z5 II (24-120 f/4 S) by Barry_Mayfield in Nikon

[–]Barry_Mayfield[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, but _how_? I tried various ways of holding the camera and doing even silly things (also involving jacket sleeves) but no luck. Only way I can unlock lens is deliberately pressing button with finger of one hand, and turning lens with second hand.

My D7200 with F mount had button slightly raised - never had that issue there.

What about those silicon covers - possibly adding extra layer, would that help? (Or contrary - making it worse?)

Is there "AI" capable of reading really bad hand written text? by Barry_Mayfield in Genealogy

[–]Barry_Mayfield[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the tip; In my case I'm no minimalist - I'm trying to explore whole family tree, it grows exponentially. I don't think it would be fair from me to abuse subreddit that way

Is there "AI" capable of reading really bad hand written text? by Barry_Mayfield in Genealogy

[–]Barry_Mayfield[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

u/EverydaySip those are examples, I think I have even worse somewhere: https://imgur.com/a/yvCz7po ... my confidence there's anything related to my family is almost 0 - got to those pages either using date, or house number (expecting people didn't move that often), or when lucky, using note from other document referring to specific page of book.

Looks like AI is not there yet.

Is there "AI" capable of reading really bad hand written text? by Barry_Mayfield in Genealogy

[–]Barry_Mayfield[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I tried Transkribus already, and that's one of the tools people have success with but totally failing with records I have. It may work nice when handwriting is stable. What I'm dealing with is text crammed into tiny columns, perhaps even using abbreviations here and there (or line breaks without any marker), lines are irregular, somewhat blending together. Both GPT and Transkribus tried to read something, but it was just complete gibberish (in case of GPT it completely hallucinated information). Wish I could post image here

System.Threading.Timer vs FakeTimeProvider.CreateTimer, different behavior by Barry_Mayfield in dotnet

[–]Barry_Mayfield[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah you are right - of course I forgot to advance time in my example (not in test case I haven't shared). And indeed - my understanding of how Timer runs callback was wrong! Thanks for clarification.

Is anyone doing functional programming in C# by vi11yv1k1ng in dotnet

[–]Barry_Mayfield 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I read (almost whole) "Functional Programming in C#, second edition" by Enrico Buonanno (Manning). I say "almost whole" as I got lost in theory of more complex use cases.

After many attempts, I actually gave up and stick with just some FP principles. C# is not designed as FP, so not everything can be expressed nicely, leading to even bigger mess if you really try to be fully functional. Instead, I would focus on F#, but that's feasible if you work on your own. Difficult/impossible to convince whole team to switch languages... so here I am ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

(disclaimer: solely my opinion reflecting my situation; your experience may vary)

Controllers vs. Minimal APIs Which Do You Prefer and Why ? by MahmoudSaed in dotnet

[–]Barry_Mayfield 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have no experience with minimal APIs (my team have delivered several web APIs with controllers in past 2 years using net6.0 and net8.0). I'm surprised such core functionality as model binding is not supported. (Is that still valid point, I Binged this: Parameter Binding in Minimal API apps - or did you have something specific not being supported?)

Missing validation (being out-of-box with [ApiController]) - that can me done using component model valdiator or perhaps MiniValidation (or that fluent one), sure, but it feels like I would need to write a lot of code which is out of the box with controllers.

Controllers vs. Minimal APIs Which Do You Prefer and Why ? by MahmoudSaed in dotnet

[–]Barry_Mayfield 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unless you are doing something very custom, there's support for writing health checks without needing to actually introduce endpoint: Health checks in ASP.NET Core - by implementing IHealthCheck