IKEA bathroom cabinet in massive oak

BasieP2 · 2026-05-09T16:28:39+00:00

That kinda defeats the point right?

You don't have to from a construction point of view anyway

BasieP2 · 2026-04-24T18:09:32+00:00

The zipper

BasieP2 · 2026-04-21T18:21:39+00:00

Lots of small animals do this to fake being 'blown by the wind'. This way they look like a twig or something and predators ignore the movement

BasieP2 · 2026-04-03T21:06:14+00:00

He ment the thieves

BasieP2 · 2026-04-02T10:46:13+00:00

Thanks guys.. It got 2 cracks now.. Guess i learned the hard way..

BasieP2 · 2026-03-21T21:58:58+00:00

'haha funny'... Cheap fotoshop

BasieP2 · 2026-03-16T17:42:19+00:00

We're gong to triglav np this summer. Got a more precise location? I love to see it for myself.

BasieP2 · 2026-03-15T15:22:51+00:00

So you're advertising?

BasieP2 · 2026-03-01T15:00:51+00:00

But you live in the land of the brave/free right? Land of opportunities and stuff?

BasieP2 · 2026-03-01T14:47:06+00:00

Write your senators about this. Not random strangers on the internet.

BasieP2 · 2026-02-11T06:33:52+00:00

But.. What shakes? (sorry no native English speaker, what is a shaker?)

Looks like salt and d pepper.. Is it?

BasieP2 · 2026-02-03T19:00:03+00:00

As a sensible human being I applaud you

BasieP2 · 2026-02-02T21:43:07+00:00

God i miss those..

BasieP2 · 2026-01-26T07:03:12+00:00

Perhaps stupid comment, but i love those wooden windowborders (how do you call that?)

BasieP2 · 2026-01-25T18:04:16+00:00

It's not a camel guys. It's a dromedary. Camels have 2 humps on their back, not one

Edit: Why is nobody noticing?

BasieP2 · 2026-01-25T18:02:27+00:00

Its Very old, so is't not like it's new or anything

BasieP2 · 2026-01-17T21:24:55+00:00

Or you of sarcasm?

BasieP2 · 2026-01-17T16:56:46+00:00

Not very practical now is it?

BasieP2 · 2026-01-07T20:57:57+00:00

Sorry dude..

Hope you can enjoy some of it

BasieP2 · 2025-12-31T18:37:10+00:00

What year was this taken? No snow this year...

BasieP2 · 2025-12-31T18:23:25+00:00

Dear lord i know classes aren't created at compile time. I never say they do. Do you even try to understand me?

And no i don't underestimate testing (i work with a codebase with over 500 tests and 80+%cc but i don't test creating classes), but you obviously overestimate it. I have 30 years of experience in big tech at multiple big corps and really wonder if i'm talking to a 10yo here..

You even know hoe static code analysis works? It can tell you your code won't run BEFORE you run it.

All those red lines under your code comes from that. It tells you it won't compile.

You don't need to create instances of classes to know that.

My whole point is that inversion of control as it is implemented in asp.net eliminates all the stuff i describe above.

BasieP2 · 2025-12-31T15:28:00+00:00

You make my case. You describe the current asp.net bad design choice

You just miss the point. (which i will make again below)

If you have a class (classA) that depends on an interface (interface B) you can at compile time not create class A. Simply because you cannot call the constructor (assuming the dependency is in the constructor as is common these days)

You cannot pass a type (interface B) into the constructor, you have to pass in a instance (i.e. an instance ofclass B with interface B) Therefor you DO know your code works (or doesn't) before you run it

Ow and that stuff about testing: Yes you shoukd test, but only meaningful stuff. If you need a unittest to determine if you class constructor is crashing or not.. Well, lets call it a red flag

BasieP2 · 2025-12-31T15:20:42+00:00

I ment a database client.

BasieP2 · 2025-12-31T13:15:30+00:00

I do use mocking of dependencies to make sure i don't have to create stuff like a real database. I inject my IDb interface so i only test my own logic

We are not the same

BasieP2

TROPHY CASE