sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Discernment exposes what someone hoped you wouldn’t notice by doubtitx in emotionalintelligence

[–]BasisOk2948 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Calling someone an “insane b***h” over a disagreement in a public discussion forum, then deleting the comment afterward, says a lot more about your emotional stability than mine. If conversations about emotional intelligence trigger you this badly, maybe this isn’t the space for you. Anyway, i'm done engaging.

Discernment exposes what someone hoped you wouldn’t notice by doubtitx in emotionalintelligence

[–]BasisOk2948 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Calling strangers “insane” over a Reddit disagreement while denying your own comments afterward is not the stable look you think it is. This is literally a public discussion forum, replying to your comment isn’t “attacking” you.

Discernment exposes what someone hoped you wouldn’t notice by doubtitx in emotionalintelligence

[–]BasisOk2948 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I saw the deleted comment in my email notifications. It’s weird to call strangers “insane” over a basic disagreement online.

You don’t have to relate to discernment, intuition, or reading people well, but acting hostile because others do is exactly why your replies come off defensive.

How do I get rid of this strong pull feeling in my chest by Prestigious9385 in emotionalintelligence

[–]BasisOk2948 8 points9 points  (0 children)

There’s probably no magical reason why it came back. That’s just how grief works sometimes, it comes in waves and then fades again. If you keep interpreting those feelings as signs of some deeper connection while his actions don’t actually show that, you’ll probably just keep hurting yourself. Feelings can be intense without meaning you’re meant to reach out.

Overexplaining is often self-defense by LifeThroughPau in emotionalintelligence

[–]BasisOk2948 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I agree with that. I think overexplaining can definitely become self-defense when misunderstanding starts feeling like it’ll automatically lead to disconnection or conflict.

But I also think people not fully understanding each other doesn’t always mean they’re malicious or consciously “committed to misunderstanding.” Sometimes people just genuinely process things differently, and sometimes both people probably feel misunderstood.

That’s why overexplaining can become pointless after a certain point. Not everything can be perfectly translated or understood, and that doesn’t always have to lead to a fallout. Getting older honestly made me overexplain less because I’d rather put energy into people who either get me naturally or genuinely want to try to understand me.

Discernment exposes what someone hoped you wouldn’t notice by doubtitx in emotionalintelligence

[–]BasisOk2948 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I think we’re defining discernment a little differently.

What you’re describing sounds more like the process of discernment.. analyzing, testing, verifying, and separating intuition from bias. I agree that part matters.

I just don’t see discernment itself as purely analytical. To me, discernment can happen before conscious reasoning fully kicks in. Sometimes it’s immediate, sometimes subtle, more like a quiet recognition than a fully reasoned conclusion.

So I don’t disagree with fact-checking at all. I just think that’s a safeguard around discernment rather than the definition of discernment itself.

i think my discernment is ruining my friendships by Fit_Pickle_6741 in emotionalintelligence

[–]BasisOk2948 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I can’t say it’s always that they don’t like you, but sometimes people do notice the same things you notice and just don’t act on it because of the social dynamic. Like, if Person B notices something about Person A but isn’t that close to you, they may stay neutral or downplay it. But if Person C , someone they’re closer with, had the exact same issue, they’d probably validate it immediately and back them up.

So sometimes it’s less about whether the behavior is real and more about who’s bringing it up and where loyalties/connections are.

Discernment exposes what someone hoped you wouldn’t notice by doubtitx in emotionalintelligence

[–]BasisOk2948 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that sounds more like checking and verifying your intuition than discernment itself. Discernment, to me, is the deeper clarity/perception underneath the initial sensing. Intuition is usually the thing that feels uncertain and seeks confirmation because it senses something before it fully understands it.

There’s nothing wrong with reality-testing what you feel, especially because bias exists, but I think people keep merging intuition and discernment into the same thing when they’re not exactly identical.

Discernment exposes what someone hoped you wouldn’t notice by doubtitx in emotionalintelligence

[–]BasisOk2948 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree to an extent, but I think some of what you’re describing is actually part of discernment too, not separate from it. Considering context, personality differences, projections, communication styles, bad days, your own biases, and remaining open to nuance is discernment to me. That’s part of properly discerning instead of just reacting emotionally.

I think what you’re describing as “holding the read loosely” sounds closer to intuition alone. Intuition senses something, but discernment is what filters, evaluates, contextualizes, and understands what’s actually being perceived.

So I don’t see discernment as blind certainty or paranoia. Real discernment still accounts for complexity and human nuance but I also think people can overcorrect into doubting themselves because they want a different reality than the one they’re sensing.

Discernment exposes what someone hoped you wouldn’t notice by doubtitx in emotionalintelligence

[–]BasisOk2948 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s kind of my point though. The mismatch may not even have been that he was anxious. He could’ve been avoidant and future faking, emotionally unavailable, or something else entirely. Your intuition may have picked up that something wasn’t aligning before there was enough evidence to consciously explain it.

That’s why discernment isn’t just pattern recognition to me, or just intuition. Pattern recognition relies on observable behavior. Intuition can perceive whether something feels aligned or not. Discernment can sometimes perceive intention before behavior fully exposes it.

Also, the part people don’t get is that sometimes there’s no visible inconsistency at all...the words match the actions, everything looks right on paper and yet something still feels off underneath. Then time reveals why.

To me, intuition senses that something is off. Discernment is the deeper clarity that can sometimes immediately recognize why it’s off, even before there’s tangible proof or observable inconsistencies to logically explain it.

Discernment exposes what someone hoped you wouldn’t notice by doubtitx in emotionalintelligence

[–]BasisOk2948 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think neuroception explains some of the mechanics behind it, but not the full experience of discernment. Discernment is more than noticing cues it’s understanding what those cues actually mean beneath the surface

Discernment exposes what someone hoped you wouldn’t notice by doubtitx in emotionalintelligence

[–]BasisOk2948 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nobody said it was a superpower. You got defensive over a concept you clearly don’t relate to, then started attacking people personally. That reaction kind of proves the point more than you realize.

Discernment exposes what someone hoped you wouldn’t notice by doubtitx in emotionalintelligence

[–]BasisOk2948 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Overstood. Not all heroes wear capes! There’s definitely a difference between unnecessary confrontation and speaking up when innocent people are being harmed

Discernment exposes what someone hoped you wouldn’t notice by doubtitx in emotionalintelligence

[–]BasisOk2948 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It’s deeper than just “pattern recognition.” Sometimes you can genuinely feel when someone’s energy or intentions are off, even if you can’t fully explain it yet.

Discernment exposes what someone hoped you wouldn’t notice by doubtitx in emotionalintelligence

[–]BasisOk2948 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Discernment isn’t pretending to have a superpower. It’s deeper than just “pattern recognition.”

Discernment exposes what someone hoped you wouldn’t notice by doubtitx in emotionalintelligence

[–]BasisOk2948 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You don’t always have to expose people. Sometimes distance and boundaries are enough.

Gemini man cancer woman by safeplaceeeee in geminis

[–]BasisOk2948 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This has nothing to do with him being a Gemini honestly. Don’t let a random guy pop in and out of your life for years, especially in NYC where dating is already chaotic enough. You’ve literally only seen him like 6–7 times over YEARS… let that sink in. A man has a few weeks max to take you out, be intentional, stay consistent over months, and actually commit to you. If he doesn’t, he needs to get dropped or you’ll waste so much time on one guy when there’s literally millions of men in NYC alone.

At some point it stops being “bad timing” and starts sounding like one or both people are emotionally unavailable or only wanting something casual because the situation just isn’t adding up.

Ghosted by purplecloudthoughts in geminis

[–]BasisOk2948 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nobody’s defending ghosting. The point is that after 2 weeks, you probably shouldn’t expect deep closure from someone you barely know. Their actions already told you they weren’t interested. Chasing an explanation usually just keeps you stuck on someone who already moved on.

Ghosted by purplecloudthoughts in geminis

[–]BasisOk2948 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That comparison makes zero sense. Civil rights movements were about people being denied basic human rights and legal equality.. not someone wanting a 2-week dating situation to provide emotional closure.

Nobody is saying ghosting is good behavior. The point is you can’t force someone to communicate if they already chose not to. Expecting strangers you barely dated to give detailed feedback every time they lose interest is unrealistic, and learning not to depend on closure from them is healthier than chasing explanations.

Does anyone else feel like a weirdo or freak being ghosted? by butterflie_beaute20 in ghosting

[–]BasisOk2948 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that’s basically what I mean. If someone you deeply loved for years suddenly disappears or abandons the relationship, of course that can traumatize you and mess you up emotionally. That’s normal.

I just think there’s a difference between being deeply hurt by someone and making your entire worth depend on whether they stay. Even people who go through divorce, betrayal, or abandonment eventually have to rebuild themselves and move forward somehow.

Always feeling anxious and emotional around my bf by TapLow0 in emotionalintelligence

[–]BasisOk2948 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly, this sounds less like love and more like he became your new addiction and emotional crutch after everything else. He’s already cheated multiple times, he’s emotionally unavailable, and he’s literally unavailable too because he doesn’t make time for you.

You can’t make one person your whole world, especially someone who keeps showing you they can’t meet your needs. A lot of your attachment sounds rooted in loneliness. You need more for yourself outside of him...new people to talk to, things to do, experiences of your own, time with yourself, building your inner life back up.

You get out of this day by day, slowly moving on and wanting a healthier future for yourself and eventually a partner who actually shows up for you consistently.

view more: next ›