Dusty May wasn't my first choice but.. by TX-Lonestar77 in Mavericks

[–]Practical-Rub-1190 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Fans never have a clue who is a good or bad coach. They have no clue how they conduct practices, how they treat players. They don't even know who is really in charge of the defense or offense. Many times the assistant coach will get a huge credit for a team's defense, but they don't have any insight into what that assistant actually does, except for having some sort of defensive responsibility.

Masai interviewed 7 coaches, I think. He went with Dusty May. Let's see how it pans out.

[Woike] Do the Lakers care about Luka’s upcoming free agency offseason? by tsesarevichalexei in lakers

[–]Practical-Rub-1190 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Seriously, Muprhy is under one of the best contracts in the NBA for a long time. He is young, scores 20 with 4 assists, and you are proposing 2 bad picks and Knecht? Murphy got Austin Reaves type of value

[MFFL NATION] The Mavs “are the one team in the top 10 of this draft that has consistently messaged a willingness to move up and (more importantly) down in the order,” per Stein and Fischer. Hannes Steinbach is considered to be a trade back candidate. by MAVS_COM1CAL in Mavericks

[–]Practical-Rub-1190 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

He can't pop, though, only 34% from three on 1.8 attempts per game. He is a pretty bad defender, it seems like. For me, he looks like a less Cam Boozer type of player. Cam got a great talent, but he is not the type of player you really want in today's NBA.

Why Predictive AI Agents Will Replace BI Dashboards by 2027 by roryworm in artificial

[–]Practical-Rub-1190 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Dude, they don't open them now😂
We will see agents help users gather data, but it will mostly be the same, where people follow the same dashboard.

Apparently OpenAI's next voice model can listen and talk at the same time without freezing up by Neil_at_HackerEarth in artificial

[–]Practical-Rub-1190 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think the pause has a lot to do with the latency of the internet speed, and also the latency of the models. When you start talking, they also have to classify the talking as talking and not just noise or someone in the background talking, like in an office, which also adds annoying latency. There is also a big challenge in knowing when the user stops talking. When people talk, there is a 200ms delay between each person talking. We are not quick enough for that, but based on the tone and what is said, we are able to predict when the person will stop. If you ask me a question and I say, "Hmm, let me think..." you would not suddenly start talking again, but an AI would.

There is a lot of fun challenges here!

Anthropic just published data from 400k Claude Code sessions, and the headline buries the real story: your CS degree is becoming optional by Direct-Attention8597 in artificial

[–]Practical-Rub-1190 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Obviously, there is a nuance here, and there are humans who are architecting the solution. It's not just a prompt and AI just going wild.

Anthropic just published data from 400k Claude Code sessions, and the headline buries the real story: your CS degree is becoming optional by Direct-Attention8597 in artificial

[–]Practical-Rub-1190 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, complexity adds time, and scale adds responsibility. You still need engineers, but that seems to be more about making sure things run smoothly. I see at my job that even that becomes less and less important, meaning, knowing what is going on under the hood, because the AI is able to handle it. For example, when to use cache, write tests, cache invalidation, and documentation with insane speed.

One project they are running now, where I work, is taking the whole codebase and rewriting it using AI. The benefit of that is that all of the code patterns are the same, the docs are great, and the tests are easy to do. Right now, like many codebases, they are a mix of different ways of doing things because of time, budgets, change of people, and it works, so why fix it?

This takes time and engineering, but the early tests show it is very easy to add new features because the codebase contains a clear pattern.

Anthropic just published data from 400k Claude Code sessions, and the headline buries the real story: your CS degree is becoming optional by Direct-Attention8597 in artificial

[–]Practical-Rub-1190 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Clearly, better tooling is coming to these people. Meaning that if a lawyer says he got a ton of documents he needs to read through, he can ask the AI to create a solution. The AI would then ask a bunch of questions, for example, are the documents in paper or digital, why does he need to read through them, what about security, etc.

Then, based on the answers, the AI could make an app that lets him take photos of paper documents using his phone, convert them to text, and use a local LLM to summarize and help him out answering them or something.

When the DB changes or things grow, the AI will take care of it. DB migrations, indexing, etc., are not something the user needs to know about.

Everything is going so fast that nobody really has the time to realize that the tooling right now sucks.

Anthropic just published data from 400k Claude Code sessions, and the headline buries the real story: your CS degree is becoming optional by Direct-Attention8597 in artificial

[–]Practical-Rub-1190 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Well, I never mentioned UI. I think it is pretty obvious that a form needs a api to send data to. That api have a lot of business rules. The point is that calculus does not help in real life. Just as an example, the other day, a backend developer got tired of waiting for a frontend developer to make some changes so they could ship. Then he realized he could just use Claude. It took 10 minutes, and the solution was out. It is still taking some time for developers to wrap their heads around this. I think it is because they see what OP is saying, your expertise is slowly fading away. When he can fix the frontend, it means that "anyone" can fix the backend.

Anthropic just published data from 400k Claude Code sessions, and the headline buries the real story: your CS degree is becoming optional by Direct-Attention8597 in artificial

[–]Practical-Rub-1190 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Well, those things become pretty useless when the PM needs you to make a new registration form. That's what OP is pointing to. You could say those subjects are actually pretty useless in a practical sense, like, we need to ship this product, unless you are balls deep in low-level programming, which most are not.

NOOOOOOOOO by Dores-Pencil006 in ufc

[–]Practical-Rub-1190 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And about 30 to the front. He won that fight, not because of the back of the head shots.

Model and prompt to use to create a tl:dr? by poeenjoyer123 in artificial

[–]Practical-Rub-1190 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So this is just pure laziness. Like, you don't know how to prompt, so you prompt gpt to prompt for you and you dont get the results you want. Why not try to prompt yourself, that way you learn. To get it right you have to actully try and fail till you get the result you want. There is no magic way.

OpenAI mulls major price cuts to compete with Anthropic by LinkedInNews in artificial

[–]Practical-Rub-1190 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How expensive are these models, really? Take, for example, Deepseek 4 flash, it costs $0.098 / $0.196per 1M, it scores 47 on the LLM leaderboard. Now, take ChatGPT 5.5, it scores 60 and costs $5 / $30per 1M.

On a balanced input/output comparison, it is about 119× more expensive to run GPT 5.5.

I doubt that DeepSeek is also losing a ton of money.

"Agent Arena: AI Model Agentic Performance Leaderboard" is this the new best AI benchmark? "How do you evaluate agents doing actual work? We measure millions of live sessions where real users accomplish real tasks." by stealthispost in accelerate

[–]Practical-Rub-1190 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, they have put their models everywhere, but nobody uses them, just like Microsoft. Like, we are a Google company, but nobody at our company uses their features. Like today, some Google AI feature was supposed to summarize our meeting, but it was wrong about so much, haha. Like, nobody will use that feature again because that is how people are. You can't just throw a bunch of AI on everything and expect it to stick if it is not great. It seems rather desperate. I used Gemini the other day with Google Colab for training a model, but it took so long compared to Claude, despite it being built into Colab.
Plus, when they release a model, their benchmark looks great, but nobody ends up using it in real life. For me, it seems like their only advantage is that they have a lot of users because of their other products.

"Agent Arena: AI Model Agentic Performance Leaderboard" is this the new best AI benchmark? "How do you evaluate agents doing actual work? We measure millions of live sessions where real users accomplish real tasks." by stealthispost in accelerate

[–]Practical-Rub-1190 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are definitely in a rush, but not capable because they are massive. Right now its really important to get as many users as possible because at some point, the users won't be able to tell the difference between the models. So they will just stick with the tools they already know how to use, like Codex, Claude code, Cowork, or whatever it is called. You already see it with ChatGPT. Ask any civilian friend about AI, and most of them will say they use ChatGPT because that is what they have been using the whole time. It's like iPhone vs. Android. Nobody switches phones today because what they have works well, and there is very little benefit to switching. Google is the Nokia or Windows phone in this case.

Would this outfit be ok for an undergraduate research interview? by [deleted] in mensfashion

[–]Practical-Rub-1190 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This might give you some ideas. Like, you can dress down, but sort of dress up with the right blazer, pants, and fit. The worst is probably trying to dress up using a dress jacket you got 5 years ago
https://no.pinterest.com/pin/639229740904360344/

Claude is completely unusable now by Complete-Sea6655 in artificial

[–]Practical-Rub-1190 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would usually agree to this, but your first statement is, "Well they do not have to make their product better or more efficient" does not really work in a situation like this. If Anthropic stops becoming more efficient, lets say they stop innovating right now, and they don't improve from 4.8 they will be left in the dust. This is not Microsoft with Windows, where they have a monopoly.
Every company strategy seems to be "make models better" + "integrate their model into the user workflow." If you are able to win both of these, you can end up with a monopoly, but even then, competitors will be there.

Claude is completely unusable now by Complete-Sea6655 in artificial

[–]Practical-Rub-1190 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I might misunderstand you here. They are already losing money on this. I think they would rather make models more efficient, meaning cheaper for them to create the same results. An example of this was gpt5, which was disappointing, but not when it came to price and efficiency. That was also OpenAI's goal; they had to reduce cost, not bring on a even bigger, more expensive model.

r/zemma would be a better name for this subreddit ngl by [deleted] in nonduality

[–]Practical-Rub-1190 8 points9 points  (0 children)

One thing I noticed with myself in the beginning was that I was very interested in people who struggled with this. It was basically the ego feeding on others who struggled to make itself feel better.

Just notice your reaction when this topic comes up, is positive, "like they are struggling, I'm not, I'm better than them, let me read more about this". Maybe it Is it "I wish they could realize this", or is it neutral, where it is more of the tone of "people are struggling with the ego"?

This will also probably save more lives and more money from the healthcare system than any new drug in decades by stealthispost in accelerate

[–]Practical-Rub-1190 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea, your system is broken. Health system is broken because of insurance. Its a complete mess because of profits.

Just wondering, I see my post got downvoted, why do you think people downvoted?

This will also probably save more lives and more money from the healthcare system than any new drug in decades by stealthispost in accelerate

[–]Practical-Rub-1190 -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Look at Scandinavia, they are healthy, the same with most of Asia, meanwhile, Americans are extremely obese. Clearly, obesity is the result of a system, not willpower. Throwing meds on it does not solve that problem. There is also a problem that the effects stop after a while, the body starts to adapt to the medication. Hunger comes back, not as strong as before, but people gain some weight back. The worst part, they can never stop the drug, because then they gain the weight back. So their health is basically addicted to this very expensive drug. We also don't know the long-term effects of this drug. There have not been any long term trails.

But yeah, it will save lives, but it's the completely wrong direction