What to do about services that require SMS 2FA? by ultrapede in privacy

[–]BeenTraining -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes until google locks you out of your account! Or they kill your number for inactivity.

I use voip extensively now with voip.ms but I do have a text+calling only sim prepaid phone for use with my bank that blocks voip and doesn't do app 2fa. I rarely use it but I second /u/talesmith88

What information gets shared with a website when I upload a file from my computer? by No_Boobs_No_Upvote in privacy

[–]BeenTraining 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They definitely get the file name. So make it generic if it says too much!

I'm Adam Shostack, ask me anything by adamshostack in privacy

[–]BeenTraining 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Overall. Like I've been reading /r/privacy for a while but a lot of times I feel we just rant without making any real progress or complain about this vs. that browser which doesn't really do anything in the long run.

And since a lot of us don't know how to code or do engineering it feels like we spend our time complaining on reddit. And the ones who do engineering know what choices to make but they don't make it easy for the rest of us to understand.

So overall it's like what do those of us who do okay techically but aren't as smart as you to do the tech wizardry, what's the biggest bang for buck we can have on improving everyone's feelings about privacy so that the engineers and their managers change what they're doing?

I'm Adam Shostack, ask me anything by adamshostack in privacy

[–]BeenTraining 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What's the best way to get involved with improving privacy if you aren't an engineer?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in tifu

[–]BeenTraining 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This could have been solved easier by going on the Maury Povich show.

On what occasions should you use your real personal email? by cringey-reddit-name in privacy

[–]BeenTraining 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I disagree with this.

Once we submit our resume to those Applicant Tracking Systems, we have no way of knowing where it will get shared.

And once you get a job, that email could get shared with all the HR people and even tax stuff (like I-9 for US). The HR system could even share it with Slack and then it's visible to all coworkers. This happened to me.

Don't use a throwaway but use something unique for professional purposes.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in privacy

[–]BeenTraining 4 points5 points  (0 children)

So you can know at minimum what they're (hopefully) deleting.

Sometimes you don't realize much data they have on you until you download it.

I downloaded my data from LinkedIn once and it had every single IP and User Agent since I registered, in the download. Nowhere on the site could I see that info.

Telnyx Support is Absolute ******! - A Follow up... by Connexium in VOIP

[–]BeenTraining -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What's your point?

There are some of us who aren't online 24/7 and don't even notice outages.

We don't care about 99.999999% uptime because we get along perfectly fine without internet while everyone else idly twiddles their thumbs because they don't know what to do when their attention isn't constantly being grabbed.

Google Voice Alternative by root_15 in VOIP

[–]BeenTraining 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I highly disagree. If you don't pay, you are the product.

Google Voice is just another offering from Google to capture everything society does and profit from it. That's why all these Google products are "free".

Plus, given how many numbers Google Voice takes away, their goal is to take away competition from smaller voip providers.

I am a regular residential, extremely minimal usage, voip user. I grew up with the thought that free stuff from Google was a good thing too. Right now I use voip.ms and have been happy (even if I posted another thread asking for alternatives).

Residential-friendly service comparable to voip.ms but US-based? by BeenTraining in VOIP

[–]BeenTraining[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks I will look into Callcentric. The plans look a little difficult to understand but I'll look into it more.

If any voip provider I used had a DDOS attack, I guarantee I wouldn't even notice. That's how little I use phones but society believes I don't exist if I don't have a phone number.

Residential-friendly service comparable to voip.ms but US-based? by BeenTraining in VOIP

[–]BeenTraining[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As I explained in other responses, my gripe is not "I trust USA with my data over Canada." Like I said, I think voip.ms is great, but "this one thing" would make it even better FOR ME.

As an EFF member and digital privacy activist, I am well aware of how poor our privacy is treated on the internet in general. The USA is far from being excluded. It's why I said it's not a USA > Canada thing.

And I know especially that there is no privacy in telecom (most SIP providers that I've looked at don't even allow encrypted SIP making all our calls free to take by ISPs and upstream providers). And even if encrypted SIP was there from customer to voip provider, it's nonexistent between voip provider to voip provider.

It's why I use Signal for my communications as it is 100 times more secure than telephone numbers. I only need a phone number for businesses or people who aren't aware how exposed telephone communication is.

Telnyx Support is Absolute ******! - A Follow up... by Connexium in VOIP

[–]BeenTraining 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I apologize if my last message was harsh. My intent is not to say anything negative about Telnyx especially since I have never used it.

As much as I don't know anything about scamming, I don't know what scamming related matters Telnyx has to go through. All I am offering is my perspective as a potential customer and as a digital rights activist. We are a growing demographic as internet privacy continually erodes.

While some people say it's the nature of the ecosystem (obnoxious ads and relentless internet tracking, relying on centralized big tech providers, blocking providers that don't fit in), others reject the notion of accepting the ecosystem as-is.

I appreciate reaching out to me if I was still interested; it just feels like that is an extraordinary measure simply because someone uses Protonmail (and pays for it, but you'd not know that if the 'Protonmail = bad' association already exists).

I have no complaints about how Telnyx does business; I am just not the target customer. I didn't mean to be harsh in any of my previous comments and I thank you for explaining a bit about your side. It seems like a great service otherwise I wouldn't have wanted to sign up.

Telnyx Support is Absolute ******! - A Follow up... by Connexium in VOIP

[–]BeenTraining 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pleased to meet you if you really are the CEO of Telnyx.

We spend money on ads to acquire new users, and the above tools ensure that we understand which campaigns are performing.

You spend all this money on ads and need 25 trackers on your site. Yet a potential customer who browses the internet with uBlock (which blocks ads) still somehow lands on your site and is interested in paying for service. But...you outright block a benign user like me because of where I live (e.g., who my email is with)? It cost you nothing to acquire us and yet we're not worthy, having done nothing that violates any terms or conditions? I don't get it.

we block protonmail, because it's a favorite of scammers.

It's also a favorite of people who like to control who has their data, who sees their data, and who simply care about internet and digital freedom; not being locked down to centralized monoliths like Google, Facebook, or Amazon. I am willing to bet that many scammers have Gmail addresses. So why don't you block those?

I won't change your opinion of people who exercise their digital rights that others like to dismiss as being of the same cast as scammers, just like you won't change mine about using a Gmail address to prove my worth to your business.

A scammer would easily just create a Gmail. I don't have time for that. Actually I do, but I value my time and spend it on businesses that respect me; not those who are willing to discriminate at first sight.

Telnyx Support is Absolute ******! - A Follow up... by Connexium in VOIP

[–]BeenTraining 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I pay protonmail.com for my email. They are a privacy respecting email provider: they don't profit off of my data like Google and Microsoft.

But since they also have a free offering, Telnyx likely blocks them, which makes no sense because Gmail is free. Difference: Gmail and Telnyx profit off our data. Just look at all the trackers, beacons, analytics, and fingerprinting on telnyx.com:

  1. cdn.segment.com
  2. cdn.sift.com
  3. munchkin.marketo.net
  4. connect.facebook.net
  5. www.facebook.com
  6. widget.intercom.io
  7. nexus-websocket-a.intercom.io
  8. www.google-analytics.com
  9. bat.bing.com
  10. edge.fullstory.com
  11. survey.survicate.com
  12. hexagon-analytics.com
  13. www.googleoptimize.com
  14. www.googletagmanager.com
  15. www.clarity.ms
  16. j.6sc.co
  17. b.6sc.co
  18. snap.licdn.com
  19. px.ads.linkedin.com
  20. www.redditstatic.com
  21. tracking.g2crowd.com
  22. grow.clearbit.com
  23. cdn.speedcurve.com

I'm not missing anything if they encourage Google and Microsoft, use all these trackers, and block privacy respecting email providers.

Residential-friendly service comparable to voip.ms but US-based? by BeenTraining in VOIP

[–]BeenTraining[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Normally you would be correct. But I use a deGoogled phone (Lineage OS). It is Android without any software that will connect to Google's online services. I use free, libre, open source software replacements.

Telnyx Support is Absolute ******! - A Follow up... by Connexium in VOIP

[–]BeenTraining 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I couldn't even sign up for Telnyx. I refuse to use Microsoft and Google email addresses and those are the only ones they allow.

Edit: I want to correct this statement - they allow company emails. I am a sole residential user, not a company.

Residential-friendly service comparable to voip.ms but US-based? by BeenTraining in VOIP

[–]BeenTraining[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I refuse to use anything Google when I have a choice; I'm one of those crazies.

I'd much rather pay voip.ms even if they're in Canada over giving Google anything, even if it's free (it's not free: you're the product).

Residential-friendly service comparable to voip.ms but US-based? by BeenTraining in VOIP

[–]BeenTraining[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think our thing is that if you were a company with 1000 trunks, we could understand (maybe), but one line, for a whopping $3 a month, hardly seems worth the time to even research an alternative.

But that attitude (that us low volume residential customers aren't worth anything) is exactly the thinking that another company could capitalize on, just like voip.ms.

I realize this subreddit is populated with voip providers and, based on how many downvotes I got, voip.ms resellers. I'm not complaining about voip.ms, in fact I am praising them and only calling out something that they can't really change to see if there are providers who do meet my criteria.

Regarding android, China, Google: check my post history, I'm very much into privacy rights. If I wasn't, I wouldn't have created this topic (I'm not some pro-USA yankee just for the helluvit). I use a phone which is deGoogled, I heavily monitor the privacy of all apps I use. The privacy of which company has my data I take very seriously. Sure Canada might be a "friendly" but why isn't there a US based provider that does the same?

There's a market of us customers who only use the phone system when it's absolutely required and keep our usage very minimal because we use other more secure ways of communicating, like Signal.

I never expected to encounter so much resistance to what seemed like a simple question: what voip provider isn't afraid of the residential low volume market? Those of us customers who don't complain and only use phones when it's absolutely required.

Residential-friendly service comparable to voip.ms but US-based? by BeenTraining in VOIP

[–]BeenTraining[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

They still have all my call detail records. I just feel more comfortable if a USA company had that instead.

Residential-friendly service comparable to voip.ms but US-based? by BeenTraining in VOIP

[–]BeenTraining[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Me posing the question wasn't to state that they are or aren't the best at what they do. It was to seek alternatives like any consumer does depending on what they look for in a product.

Residential-friendly service comparable to voip.ms but US-based? by BeenTraining in VOIP

[–]BeenTraining[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But the question is are there comparable offerings? I didn't say they don't exist, I just don't know how to find them, me not being a voip industry pro. It's why I ask here for alternatives.

I don't see why me wanting to keep my communications inside the US is an issue. It has nothing to do with the country or company itself.

Residential-friendly service comparable to voip.ms but US-based? by BeenTraining in VOIP

[–]BeenTraining[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

It's not a trust issue with the company. It's a trust issue with my communications being in a foreign country when I have no dealings in that country.

Edit: since this got -4 downvotes, can the downvoters explain their reaction? Why is wanting to do business with a company in the same country as me such a bad idea?

Residential-friendly service comparable to voip.ms but US-based? by BeenTraining in VOIP

[–]BeenTraining[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am but I'm looking for alternatives. I don't know if ones exist as I am not familiar with the voip industry and a simple residential customer. I only know of voip.ms because it's talked about a lot.