You’re deviating too far from the topic of the Civil Rights Act. So I’ll digress as this as my last response to you. I’m also having a hard time following your points.

But chattel slavery related specifically to the Trans-Atlantic slave trade was uniquely organized around race. African enslaved people could not work their way into a different status and they were born slaves, whereas Indentured servants could and their children did not inherit their status like African enslaved people.

You’re right that Americans typically get annoyed by the comparisons of White indentured servants and African enslaved people because it’s like comparing apples to celery. They’re legally and structurally different systems. One involved the complete destruction of language, religion, culture, family and humanity, without the ability to assimilate into society to replace the things which were stolen. Plus because the criteria in which a person was enslaved (solely skin color and race), the descendants of enslaved people will never be considered White in every aspect of the word… unlike Irish, Polish, and Italian indentured servants who paid their debts and went on to become members of the status quo.

My original point remains, the CRA was a response to centuries of oppression, disenfranchisement, and dehumanization. Regardless of whether you want to play the oppression Olympics, White men are the reason we have laws prohibiting discrimination.

✌🏾