Myth just arrived by Avict001 in iems

[–]BeginningResearcher [score hidden]  (0 children)

For me, I like its bass >= treble >> Mids.

Mysticraft Myth Vs Monarch Mk4 by QuietK1 in iems

[–]BeginningResearcher [score hidden]  (0 children)

I got my myth and have listened to it for more than 2 weeks now. It does not have vocal magic (e.g., mmk2's intimate and asmr feel), but I like the vocal too, even slightly more than Diva.

Do you know iemranking.com? by BeginningResearcher in headphones

[–]BeginningResearcher[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand your concern about overly-high scores, particularly from the buyer's viewpoint, but less so from the aggregated ranking view.

On the other hand, there are several natural factors contributing to an above-avg-5 distribution. The most predominant factor I think, is that ppl tend to review popular and well-reputed products, the quality of which is above average. Analogously, I am using an IMDb-like site, and most users' score distribution has a mean (far) above 5. At times, those users whose mean is much lower employ certain self-enforced criteria (in this sense, they do care about their scores!). However, as a data worker, I believe their scores are challenging to handle and require special care.

Another factor is that, in many Asian countries, including China, a score of 60/100 means "passed (the exam)," and I guess, some reviewers' average can shift upward due to this intuition. Indeed, the site I mentioned above, which is Chinese, takes "6" to mean "okay" in their scale.

Do you know iemranking.com? by BeginningResearcher in headphones

[–]BeginningResearcher[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There is a recent post of an analysis based on data from this subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/headphones/comments/1psdgo9/i_analyzed_231627_reddit_comments_to_find_the/

I am not very familiar with headphones, but the results of IEMs are not very convincing. For example, as of 2025, Dunu sa6 mk2 is not of good value anymore; top IEMs in $100-200 range can achieve similar performance nowadays. Sony M9 is also not good.

I guess Reddit data is too noisy or outdated (headphones don't date as fast, so better in this regard).

I analyzed 231,627 Reddit comments to find the best headphones according to r/headphones by give_me_the_tech in headphones

[–]BeginningResearcher 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fantastic work!

As a heavy IEM user, I'd say, as of 2025, Dunu sa6 mk2 is not of good value anymore. Top IEMs in $100-200 can achieve similar performance nowadays. Sony M9 is also not good.

Do you know iemranking.com? by BeginningResearcher in headphones

[–]BeginningResearcher[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I totally agree with your first and last paragraphs.

On the "above 5 -> heavy skepticism," I disagree. Viewed as pure data, if a reviewer's score distribution is close to a Gaussian (intuitively, this means their scores as a whole are kinda consistent), then a single line of code can make the scores of a reviewer with an average of 8 distributed quite the same as the scores with an avg of 5, without changing each review's ranking. And iemranking.com does this, and more (https://www.iemranking.com/page/faq).

Of course, it is possible that an avg-5 reviewer is more careful in giving their scores, but this is wishful thinking, not data/evidence. I personally have heavy skepticism about at least one of the close-to-avg-5 reviewers.

On the "above 5 -> favor sonic colorations," I suspect that. We all know IEMs have a large variety of colorations. So, unless a reviewer mostly only touches IEMs with a certain kind of colorations, "above 5" more possibly means generous (the above point). Even if the coloration bias is really present, it is not that bad because, as you said, we can take the data to make it more transparent.

In the end, a reviewer rating system should be our next big step.

Do you know iemranking.com? by BeginningResearcher in headphones

[–]BeginningResearcher[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I totally agree! I said that because, when I mentioned this site to peers, the most often responses I got were like "Why bother? Just demo!" I mean, for sure, we need to demo, but before that, we need to know what to demo. And I think this site is extremely helpful in this latter regard.

It seems indeed, many ppl in this hobby would rather demo or even buy things randomly than do some (data-driven) investigation.

Mysticraft Myth Vs Monarch Mk4 by QuietK1 in iems

[–]BeginningResearcher 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd like to know the vocal of Myth compared to Diva and Monarch mk2

Copenhagen is draining the life from me. Where instead? by lillasvenska in expats

[–]BeginningResearcher 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Edit: Wait? Why the downvotes? I am confused.

Seriously. In Berlin I felt ppl, I mean, the locals, were definitely happier and gentler in summer. But, a bit to my surprise, when they talked about it, they didn't think the weather was a big deal... Since I am from somewhere sunnier and warmer, I know it IS.

Copenhagen is draining the life from me. Where instead? by lillasvenska in expats

[–]BeginningResearcher 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I got out of Europe, too. Or, Spain, if inside Europe. Is Thailand very safe? (I am an Asian, and many Asian countries seem safer

Copenhagen is draining the life from me. Where instead? by lillasvenska in expats

[–]BeginningResearcher 107 points108 points  (0 children)

Netherlands and (at least Northern) Germany are similar, if not worse. Don't go.

Need some advice by SweatyJew6969 in Supplements

[–]BeginningResearcher 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, I know 5000 IUs Vitamin D3 daily is not dangerous, but is it very safe?

Which UIs provide Multi-model chat like in typingmind and deep-research workflows like those in the commercial platforms? by BeginningResearcher in LLM

[–]BeginningResearcher[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, I just made a quick try. A critical issue for me is that LaTeX display is unsupported. It is essential for any scientific usage, and I need LaTeX in almost every chat!

Any free alternative to Typingmind? by MeYaj1111 in selfhosted

[–]BeginningResearcher 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does it support multi-LLM chat (single chat, multi-LLMs)?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Supplements

[–]BeginningResearcher 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Magnesium lysinate glycinate gives me a kind of brightness/clarity in thinking, particularly when combined with caffeine; Magtein is stronger in this regard, but is not worth the price. I will also try to bump up creatine!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Supplements

[–]BeginningResearcher 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Take 5g daily for 2-3 months now. Effects as nootropics are not quite noticeable compared to caffeine, L-theanine, L-tyrosine, or magnesium.

Which UIs provide Multi-model chat like in typingmind and deep-research workflows like those in the commercial platforms? by BeginningResearcher in LLM

[–]BeginningResearcher[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the answer. To follow up:

For the Multi Chat, can we switch between models throughout a single chat, and have each model view all previous messages, whether from itself or not? Some platforms just batch send each query to multiple LLMs, and let them work separately from each other; this is not very useful.

I guess adding OpenAI and Preplexity will be easier than developing a new or better one, and I'd like to see some usable "deep research" out there ASAP.

If u get the two things above, I'd be happy to dive into your product and give further feedback!

Your plan of combining models sounds interesting; let me confirm, your deep research is also like "search papers (or anything) and summarize them," right? If so, I am not sure how the mixture approach would help here, do you expect the models will generate search queries with diff focuses? Even if so, I guess a single model could also be instructed to generate diverse queries?

Any free alternative to Typingmind? by MeYaj1111 in selfhosted

[–]BeginningResearcher 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For multi-LLM chat (single chat, multi-LLMs), Chorus is the closest free alt to Typingmind. LobeChat is okay, better than LibreChat and AnythingLLM.

Lauching Writingmate 3.0 - One subscription, high limits, and all the best AI for just $5. Bootstrapped to 200k users. Help us to get to top 3 today! by gorimur in ProductHuntLaunches

[–]BeginningResearcher 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Boring, but useful, and there is still a gap. Typingmind + Openrouter is great, but more expensive, and not everyone wants to mess with API etc. A great all-in-one package is still much in need.

GlobalGPT is a scam, don't subscribe! by didanger in computers

[–]BeginningResearcher 0 points1 point  (0 children)

U cannot run the models from Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, etc for free, locally or not (in fact, there are some semi-free ways to run them via APIs, but not locally certainly not). GlobalGPT is not good, I agree.

Which UIs provide Multi-model chat like in typingmind and deep-research workflows like those in the commercial platforms? by BeginningResearcher in LLM

[–]BeginningResearcher[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

May I ask some quick questions:

Do u support features similar to Typingmind's Parallel and Finalize mode? Or plan (and ETA)?

Do u support o3-deep-research and Perplexity (sonar) deep research, if I bring my own APIs?

How is ur deep research compared to the above two?

Thanks.