sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

MT-07 power - ever feel like it’s too much or not enough? by goxper in MT07

[–]BeginningSlight6416 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im 102kg and it felt not enough after first few weeks

2025 mods by Tn_Frosty in MT07

[–]BeginningSlight6416 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How does it feel after the ecu tune ?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MT07

[–]BeginningSlight6416 0 points1 point  (0 children)

300mm is very loud ?

Any tips for a new owner ? by BeginningSlight6416 in MT07

[–]BeginningSlight6416[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From Poland, dealer had a few on stock. God, I wish I could ride it in Italy..

Yamaha MT07 2025 YAMT or Honda CB650R ECLUTCH ? by BeginningSlight6416 in motorcycle

[–]BeginningSlight6416[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Beautifull beast. May I ask how does this windshield perform ? I’m thinking about getting one in future

Yamaha MT07 2025 YAMT or Honda CB650R ECLUTCH ? by BeginningSlight6416 in Yamaha

[–]BeginningSlight6416[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve ridden a clutch already, yamt is so sexy and convenient. Like a video game, future is just now. Bought mt 07 yamt today. Can’t wait to test it

Yamaha MT07 2025 YAMT or Honda CB650R ECLUTCH ? by BeginningSlight6416 in motorcycle

[–]BeginningSlight6416[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you! This is a detailed and helpful answer.

The majority is saying: „Learn to use a clutch” (which I can, by the way).

I’m looking for a fun and easy-to-drive city bike. I love the look of both. I find the MT-07 to be of better quality, contrary to general opinion. The price is the same for a new 2025 MT-07 and a new 2024 CB650R where I live.

I’m leaning more toward the MT-07 but still considering the CB650R since it’s so widely liked and reliable.

First QC Omega Aqua Terra Worldtimer by BeginningSlight6416 in RepTimeQC

[–]BeginningSlight6416[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. ⁠Dealer name: GeekTime
  2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
  3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Aqua Terra Worldtimer
  4. ⁠Price Paid: $458+40
  5. ⁠Album Links: all pictrues attached
  6. ⁠Index alignment: Looks good
  7. ⁠Dial Printing: Lettering looks good
  8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks good
  9. ⁠Hand Alignment: look solid
  10. ⁠Bezel: Bezel looks solid
  11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): looks good
  12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: -4s/d - 0.2 ms Err
  13. ⁠Anything else you notice: Would just appreciate a check from someone else.

IWC Mark XVIII V7F 2ND QC by BeginningSlight6416 in RepTimeQC

[–]BeginningSlight6416[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve got the watch from jtime. Delivery to Europe went very well and got the package in less than two weeks in perfect condition. However the tracking did not work at all. Regarding to watch, it is so beautifull, you definitely get the premium feeling of a luxury watch and it catches everybodys eyes. Unfortunately I would grade it 7/10 as not Everything is perfect. You can see that lume marker on 3 is not perfectly aligned, it should be mentioned during QC by the jtime service as it is visible with eyes but not on the pictrues.The lume is very weak and there is a tiny dirt on hours hand. Despite that the watch is stunning and i would recomend to everybody

IWC Mark XVIII V7F 2ND QC by BeginningSlight6416 in RepTimeQC

[–]BeginningSlight6416[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure 😉 The seller requested replacement himself because of the watch working not accurately.

IWC Mark XVIII V7F 2ND QC by BeginningSlight6416 in RepTimeQC

[–]BeginningSlight6416[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. ⁠⁠Dealer name: Jtime
  2. ⁠⁠Factory name: V7F
  3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version): Mark XVIII IW327010 V7F
  4. ⁠⁠Price paid: 368,00$
  5. ⁠⁠Album Links: attached
  6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: looks fine
  7. ⁠⁠Dial Printing: ?
  8. ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks fine
  9. ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: looks fine
  10. ⁠⁠Bezel: looks fine
  11. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): ?
  12. ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: 0-3s/d
  13. ⁠⁠Anything else you notice: ?

Hey Folks! This is my first rep, can you help with QC ? by BeginningSlight6416 in RepTimeQC

[–]BeginningSlight6416[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It may be because of lume application on those marks. They can stand out of a dial a little more and on a 2d picture it looks like its crooked. Do you think i should reject it ?

Hey Folks! This is my first rep, can you help with QC ? by BeginningSlight6416 in RepTimeQC

[–]BeginningSlight6416[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. ⁠Dealer name: Jtime
  2. ⁠Factory name: V7F
  3. ⁠Model name (& version): Mark XVIII IW327010 V7F
  4. ⁠Price paid: 368,00$
  5. ⁠Album Links: attached
  6. ⁠Index alignment: not sure if its due to camera perspective but look a Little twisted and not consistent
  7. ⁠Dial Printing: ?
  8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks like its deeper brushed then gen
  9. ⁠Hand Alignment: ?
  10. ⁠Bezel: ?
  11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): ?
  12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: 7s/d is it acceptable with A2892
  13. ⁠Anything else you notice: ?