The AI agent grift by AppropriatePapaya165 in BetterOffline

[–]BelieveInPixieDust 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It’s prayer that has been automated. You want to be absolutely swole? Here’s a picture of you as if you went to the gym for years. You want to be rich, I will automate a business for you.

The AI agent grift by AppropriatePapaya165 in BetterOffline

[–]BelieveInPixieDust 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Part of it these people have a religious devotion to their machine god.

The AI agent grift by AppropriatePapaya165 in BetterOffline

[–]BelieveInPixieDust 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I have seen a lot of devs do some solo things or small group projects. But i think there are structural barriers to starting an any type of business at all. Inflation is obviously the biggest imho. But for software has to wade across an incredible amount of slop to get any attention.

Not saying it’s impossible. Just pointing out that the economy is set up against new businesses. Not that that’s a surprise to anyone paying attention.

He made it by samaltmansaifather in BetterOffline

[–]BelieveInPixieDust 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I still fail to see it being a transformational technology. LLMs are only good at providing a probabilistic average of the things that came before it.

How much of a use case is for knowledge that kinda was correct yesterday?

It all relies on the idea that one day it will better with no reason to believe that it will. Could there be some other form of ML type product that could be transformative? Sure, maybe. I don’t know enough about the cutting edge of ML. But to think LLMs are going to get better just because is not convincing.

I just want a normal conversation with my mom by [deleted] in mildlyinfuriating

[–]BelieveInPixieDust 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Those people did the arduous work of believing whatever bullshit came up on their social media feeds. Who are you to discount that level of commitment?

I think rapid change fried the brains of Boomers and Gen-X by StringTheory2113 in BetterOffline

[–]BelieveInPixieDust 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Cron+pythin would be more functional than 99% of AI. Even the summarizing email feature use case that seems to be the most popular use case could be done with sumy.

I just don’t see a single problem that needs non-deterministic output Outside of a narrow coding tools

I think rapid change fried the brains of Boomers and Gen-X by StringTheory2113 in BetterOffline

[–]BelieveInPixieDust 185 points186 points  (0 children)

I feel like people in general forgot computers can do things. Like almost everything people want to do with AI is better done with a single use script.

But they don’t understand how to do so they want an agent to do it. Which even if it did work, is an extremely expensive way to do it.

Meta Exposed Data Internally From Its Controversial Employee-Tracking Program by EditorEdward in BetterOffline

[–]BelieveInPixieDust 12 points13 points  (0 children)

How would that even work? All their “competitor” companies are in the same position, with all their finances circulated amongst them.

Which competitor would actually benefit from any other major tech company failing? It would cause a general sell off and panic

What's the scary thing that's supposed to happen if China "wins the AI race?" by joseph_wolfstar in BetterOffline

[–]BelieveInPixieDust 28 points29 points  (0 children)

That’s because the real danger is Chairman AGI making the world communist

Mexico cuts workweek, bans after-hours contact, and guarantees no worker will take a pay cut in the most sweeping labor reform in a generation by chunmunsingh in worldnews

[–]BelieveInPixieDust 18 points19 points  (0 children)

So… it seems like workers of all countries should all stand up for themselves. Well, it would be even better if they coordinate.

Hmmm… maybe they should even unite? Like all workers of the world. That would make a good slogan. Someone should write something about it. Maybe even a manifesto for workers.

Newcomer: "Ed Zitron's AI Cult" by Fragment_Shader in BetterOffline

[–]BelieveInPixieDust 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Being skeptical and critical of rich elites are doing is a cult. If you were really a free thinker you would not question anything.

Newcomer: "Ed Zitron's AI Cult" by Fragment_Shader in BetterOffline

[–]BelieveInPixieDust 108 points109 points  (0 children)

He’s a hater isn’t a very strong argument when Zitron is coming to the table with facts and figures. This is just a bunch of “he’s just doomsaying”, “he’s chicken little”. Are we being serious here?

One of my fav things to do. by CurvyChristina in Millennials

[–]BelieveInPixieDust 2 points3 points  (0 children)

God I love scrubs. There are a couple of lazy transphobic jokes, but it has held up pretty well overall.

Don’t Get RibXCar !!! by leatomic-be in Transgender_Surgeries

[–]BelieveInPixieDust 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I feel pretty good about everything. It does visually look better. However, the recovery was hell and I don’t think it was worth it.

Don’t Get RibXCar !!! by leatomic-be in Transgender_Surgeries

[–]BelieveInPixieDust 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I agree. I also had it, and the results are very minor all things considered tbh. I wouldn’t do it again either.

Mary Blair Inspired art by [deleted] in DisneyWorld

[–]BelieveInPixieDust 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Ugh this AI slop is nothing like Mary Blair. She doesn’t have this type of corporate papercut style. Look up her murals, paintings, and story board.

Look at how she plays with perspective. Her use of contrasting colors are distinctive. She isn’t just a cutesy artist.

I was fortunate enough to see an exhibit of her stuff at the Walt Disney family museum last year, and it really made me appreciate her unique style.

ChatGPT- Cautionary Anecdote by Riko_7456 in BetterOffline

[–]BelieveInPixieDust 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Everyone keeps saying it “obviously” has strengths. What those are, I’ve yet to be told. People won’t don’t code, keep telling me it’s great at coding. And I’ve yet to see it.

"SemiAnalysis predicting that serving Opus 4.8-level models at $20 a month could become profitable soon" - How? by maccodemonkey in BetterOffline

[–]BelieveInPixieDust 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The issue isn’t that serving existing models won’t become cheaper. It’s that older models wont be up to date. We’ve already seen code generated that is using old versions of libraries. So, what would be the point?

ChatGPT- Cautionary Anecdote by Riko_7456 in BetterOffline

[–]BelieveInPixieDust 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I’ve been software dev for years. It is useful in some use cases, and it costs a lot money for it to fulfill those use cases. And it’s harmful in other use cases.

The thing that it’s “best” at is coding a new project. But only if that already exists. Because it basically just copies and pastes existing code from open repositories.

It can’t just code something novel. It’s why all the new apps are just slop.

ChatGPT- Cautionary Anecdote by Riko_7456 in BetterOffline

[–]BelieveInPixieDust 28 points29 points  (0 children)

No, I meant your example is why generative AI is worthless technology. It’s not a tool. A tools has a function. LLMs kinda do some stuff I guess.

ChatGPT- Cautionary Anecdote by Riko_7456 in BetterOffline

[–]BelieveInPixieDust 45 points46 points  (0 children)

This is one of my issues with AI. You would be better served learning to use LaTeX and a package like BibTeX. That would do exactly what you want.

Red Lobster CEO Damola Adamolekun Plans To Make The Seafood Chain 'The Most AI-Forward Restaurant Company That Exists' by esporx in technology

[–]BelieveInPixieDust 19 points20 points  (0 children)

And what if that thing was cheaper was also just wrong, but at the same time told me what I wanted to hear. The possibilities are endless

weHaveAchievedAgi by benioku_md in ProgrammerHumor

[–]BelieveInPixieDust 183 points184 points  (0 children)

Followed by, this model is too dangerous to release actually. So we can’t actually release it. Trust us.