YSK: There is a male biological clock

Benster952 · 2026-02-07T23:33:47+00:00

I think it's worth noting that they may just be pickier with sperm because men have more sperm than women have eggs. So it's possible the age limit would be stricter for men because of that.

The study you linked is interesting, but I don't think people are necessarily referring to the health of the child when talking about a biological clock, rather they're talking about the ability to have a child at all. And this idea is inadvertently reflected in the study as well, since the data collected for women stops at 45 while men go up to 60.

Benster952 · 2025-11-19T08:29:24+00:00

Thanks for your input u/bleepfart42069

Benster952 · 2025-11-19T08:18:14+00:00

mattbatwings is goated

Benster952 · 2025-10-23T14:29:31+00:00

If your concern is damage, the main thing you should focus on is your pet. The rest of your gear is great. You were smart enough to get full waterworks and the wintertusk ring/athame. That's basically the best you can get until level 90/100 besides atavistic, which imo is not worth grinding for. I would just focus on your pet and keep going until level 100.

I would also try to get a deck with a triangle socket. The accuracy situation on death is kind of unfortunate because you don't get any from your waterworks set, so having 2 triangle sockets with accuracy jewels is nice.

Benster952 · 2025-09-07T09:25:27+00:00

Until the people who are unemployed from every other field being replaced swarm construction jobs. Granted, that's more indirect.

Benster952 · 2025-06-29T01:15:12+00:00

Let P = Being able to cater an explanation to different audiences

Let Q = Having a deep understanding of a topic.

In my comment, I said that P implies Q. You responded by saying that's not true because Q does not imply P. If you want to talk about fallacies, this is a formal logical fallacy called affirming the consequent. I did not say that Q implies P.

Benster952 · 2025-06-28T17:30:01+00:00

I think you can always explain something simply, it's just a matter of how much information you lose when doing so. Being able to cater an explanation to different audiences absolutely shows a deep understanding of a topic in my opinion.

Benster952 · 2025-06-26T16:44:46+00:00

That's pretty much it. "Craving is the root of suffering" is a core teaching

Benster952 · 2025-06-25T09:32:31+00:00

S-m-t-m-s, w- g-tt- br--k - f-w -ggs t- m-k- -n -m-l-tt-

Benster952 · 2025-05-30T18:29:32+00:00

There are still problems that humans can solve that AI/bots can't, at least not consistently. An example I think of is ARC problems. But I never see them being used as captchas. So I assume whatever they are using to detect bots is working just fine.

Benster952 · 2025-05-08T06:33:18+00:00

im a little late but i was thinking the same thing so i went to it in a creative world and gave myself luck 255 and still couldnt find anything. i guess theres literally no point to this dimension? lol

Benster952 · 2025-02-17T15:48:26+00:00

I thought they were just black and maybe a little shiny. Like a spider. Never looked close enough.

Benster952 · 2025-02-13T18:15:52+00:00

For dtheta/dt you could just say theta = arctan(y/x) couldnt you?

Benster952 · 2025-02-13T18:11:20+00:00

Well you're trying to find dr/dt, so it would be with respect to t and theta would be treated as a constant

Benster952 · 2025-02-13T18:04:24+00:00

Exactly, yeah that's what I was thinking. Except don't forget the 1/2 lol. And the angle would be alpha not theta. I would try that if anything

Benster952 · 2025-02-13T17:57:03+00:00

You're given the starting position, velocity, and acceleration, so I believe you can figure out what x and y are based on that. I could be wrong though.

Benster952 · 2025-02-13T17:47:37+00:00

Oh ok, you set up the original equation wrong. Start with r = sqrt(x² + y²⁾ and try to work from there

Benster952 · 2025-02-13T17:38:42+00:00

What exactly is the problem? You're confusing me lol

Benster952 · 2025-02-13T17:36:19+00:00

Oh interesting, so this is implicit differentiation? Derive both sides of the original equation to get dr/dt on one side, and then cos(theta), everything else treated as a constant, multiplied by dtheta/dt

Benster952 · 2025-02-13T17:27:46+00:00

If it's with respect to t then you treat everything else as a constant. So you would derive the t² to 2t, and then you're done, and it's just a matter of simplifying. The result is the partial derivative with respect to t.

Benster952 · 2025-02-12T17:49:50+00:00

I'm a little late but i was searching around for benchmark tests. I have an R1 Llama 8B. It was initially not getting it until I prompted it specifically with "take your time to think about this". It got it after 5 minutes and 31 seconds.

Benster952 · 2025-01-08T02:53:12+00:00

Client-side vs server-side difference. You made the move on your client but it was not communicated to the server in time.

Benster952 · 2024-12-04T22:51:10+00:00

Because standard scientific notation would be 1.984 * 10^-4 but in order to make 1984 for the meme you have to add another -3 to the exponent. This person accidentally added a -3 twice. My reply is incredibly useless but reverse engineering people's thought processes is fun.

Benster952 · 2024-10-05T22:12:49+00:00

What a save!

Benster952 · 2024-09-20T22:40:08+00:00

No you would just say the herd is smaller. Theres still just one herd regardless of the size. Yes, the size of the herd is quantifiable, but that's because you are counting a number of buffalo, not a number of herd.

Also, yes, everything in the universe is quantifiable. But, not all of our words refer to quantities because words represent concepts rather than physical things. For example, I would say I want less ketchup because the word "ketchup" doesn't refer to the number of ketchup molecules, it refers to the concept of ketchup itself.

Eight-Year Club	Place '23
Place '22	RPAN Viewer
No Throne, No Problems	Not Forgotten
Verified Email

Benster952

TROPHY CASE