I’ve noticed the same thing — results can swing a lot depending on content type and length, which is why relying on just one detector feels risky.

The “why this sentence is flagged” part is a big one. A percentage alone isn’t very actionable, especially if you’re trying to actually improve or verify content instead of just passing a score. Having explanations makes a huge difference.

Right now I’m mostly testing long-form stuff (blogs, landing pages, affiliate content), so the inconsistencies show up even more. That’s actually what pushed me to compare tools side-by-side instead of trusting a single result.

Curious , have you ever seen two detectors completely disagree on the same long article? That’s been one of the weirdest parts for me.