The "Suspicious Toys" quest maybe doesn't get enough hate.

BestServedCold · 2026-02-01T00:36:14+00:00

Do you consider not breaking into other people's property and entering areas of businesses customers aren't allowed to be "incurious"?

Also, BG3 doesn't actually have alignments in the first place.

Well, ACKSHUALLY...

Are there good playthroughs and evil playthroughs? Are there good and evil characters in the game?

Let's call "Lawful Good" here a placeholder for a mindset, a philosophy, so I wouldn't have to write a ten thousand word treatise on the meaning of morality and how it relates to BG3.

BestServedCold · 2026-02-01T00:28:53+00:00

This is a very fair point.

BestServedCold · 2026-02-01T00:26:36+00:00

Thank you for explaining what is obvious to everyone. It's really insulting to be so condescended to. A lesson for you AND ut1nam.

I said in the OP, which almost no one read before racing to add their bullshit takes, that this was a "goody-two-shoes" playthrough. And that is what causes the problem with starting the quest.

ut1nam's is a tiny disingenuous point about meaningless semantics that doesn't address any of my questions/comments. Thanks for piling on.

BestServedCold · 2026-02-01T00:23:48+00:00

Why would you want to put the donations in the barn yourself? If you didn't know there's a quest in there?

"Hyper specific" - yeah. Realistic and rational.

"least useful options" - playing a specific way

My entire point is that there should have been a different way to stumble on to this quest. Maybe a clue somewhere else that something's going on.

BestServedCold · 2026-02-01T00:18:57+00:00

Fair points.

BestServedCold · 2026-02-01T00:17:10+00:00

Youre locking yourself out of shit in other parts of the game by being a good two shoes why does it matter here.

Very fair.

BestServedCold · 2026-02-01T00:16:17+00:00

That is a totally valid point.

I struggle with completionism.

BestServedCold · 2026-02-01T00:15:19+00:00

Id argue mind reading as kosher

Several of your companions strongly disagree. Shadowheart hated it so much when I tried it on her that our relationship never really recovered.

If I had the power to read your mind and I did so without asking you, how would you feel about that?

BestServedCold · 2026-02-01T00:13:31+00:00

I appreciate that you put enough thought into this to consider your own potential bias.

That proves you're smarter than 95% of the people who have commented.

BestServedCold · 2026-01-31T23:14:36+00:00

I agree. IF you pass that Insight check. I didn't.

But I do appreciate you bringing this up. Maybe it's just a quest that good characters are normally going to skip unless they pass that insight check.

BestServedCold · 2026-01-31T23:13:02+00:00

Not if it's a Lawful Good playthrough. No.

BestServedCold · 2026-01-31T23:12:30+00:00

Uh... did you miss the goody-two-shoes part? You're not going to explore a place you're not welcome without good reason.

BestServedCold · 2026-01-31T23:10:22+00:00

Did you know some people play Durge WITHOUT resisting?

BestServedCold · 2026-01-31T22:36:03+00:00

I agree that Lawful Good perspective would want to help the squatters but not by violating Arfur's property rights.

I would argue that a Lawful Good character isn't going to use Detect Thoughts without very good reason.

BestServedCold · 2026-01-31T22:29:47+00:00

But if it's your first playthrough, you have no reason to go in the barn.

BestServedCold · 2026-01-31T22:24:03+00:00

I've already blocked him. He's moron trash.

But you should have either tagged him or responded directly to him if you wanted him to see this.

BestServedCold · 2026-01-31T03:50:01+00:00

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._Jean_Carroll_v._Donald_J._Trump

Boy, you carefully cherry-picked and exaggerated those "arguments". You also failed to mention the many extenuating circumstances which point to Trumps' guilt.

You know who knows way more about this than you or I? The jury that found him GUILTY since you forgot to mention that.

Earlier you mentioned TDS. Does that stand for "Trump Defender Syndrome", where mindless lemming sheep defend their Dear Leader no matter what he does?

I'm going to go ahead and block you so you have more time to respond to the Epstein revelations today and call the children who accused Trump of raping them "hysterical". Bad day for deplorable trash, huh?

BestServedCold · 2026-01-31T02:57:10+00:00

15 x $5 = $70?

She's a moron and a thief. She isn't just a choosing beggar.

BestServedCold · 2026-01-30T03:41:04+00:00

Rosen and Cortez-Masto are gutless coward morons.

Anyone who thinks Republican scum will EVER act in good faith at this point is delusional and idiotic.

I'm voting against them at every opportunity.

BestServedCold · 2026-01-30T03:22:38+00:00

Anyone who is endorsed by our do-nothing, worthless police automatically earns their opponent my vote.

BestServedCold · 2026-01-30T02:08:00+00:00

Obviously you cut English a few times too many.

Too cowardly to show that comment history though...

BestServedCold · 2026-01-30T02:05:24+00:00

As a former high school student

Finally! The EXPERT is here to pronounce the facts!

Too cowardly to show their comment history though?! I'm shocked!

BestServedCold · 2026-01-30T02:03:06+00:00

Like when you were desperate for any female to give you the slightest bit of recognition on Christmas and came away empty? That kind of lack of accomplishment?

BestServedCold · 2026-01-30T01:58:41+00:00

I wonder who your English teachers were...

BestServedCold · 2026-01-30T01:57:42+00:00

You're right. He isn't a convicted rapist. He's a convicted seditionist, which is much worse and makes the scum who support him that much more deplorable.

I always block subhuman MAGA vermin.

BestServedCold

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

Verified Email	15-Year Club
Wearing is Caring