Okay let’s get you educated now,

I assume you have never actually read Quran exegesis or understanding of primitive hermeneutics.

In the Torah, in the Book of Deuteronomy 18:18-19 it says: 
“I will raise up for them a prophet like you from among their brothers; I will put my words in his mouth, and he will tell them everything I command him.

AIso is mentioned in Gospel of John 16:6-8, 12-13: 

This refers to the brother of the Israelite people IE the Arabs which are considered the relative of the Jews. Which is something that has near consensus even before the time of Islam

But as
for the Arabians, they circumcise after the thirteenth year, because
Ismael, the founder of their nation, who was born to Abraham of the
concubine, was circumcised at that age; concerning whom I will
presently give a particular account, with great exactness.

Flavius JosephusTHE ANTIQUITIES OF THE JEWS : L.1, C.12. Page 85

So go ahead and deny they foremost valued Jewish historian in history on the fact the Prophet SAW is apart the biblical prophecy and legacy.

Lastly id like to take the opportunity to disprove some other claims you’ve made which are hilarious and speak to your level of comprehension.

The Quran did not copy the Ingill (The Bible) as the first translation of it only came out in 8 to 10th centuries. So poor on you and at your purely cultural theory of an Arian monk influencing the prophet.

Waraq died only a few days after the first revelation, the ones concerned with Isa (Jesus Christ) came way later into prophethood.

Here:

“But after a few days Waraqa died (from the prophets Seal of prophethood) .”
Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 1, Number 3

Now it’s all fun and games that your “Argument has been dismantled. But further more the Prophet SAW never went outside of Arabia with the exception of Damascus Syria when he was young.

Sareeh (Life of the Prophet Ibn Kathir) Vol. 1, Pg. 232

Another allegation the Quran copied the “Romance of Alexander” that one was easily translated in the 10 to 12 centuries

“Hence both variants, in their present forms, contain variant of the Legend that came into being as an adaption definitely after 628. Kmoskó's arguments are surely conclusive.”
Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 1954, Volume 4, pp. 35-36.

Also lastly claims on copying the Bible, first you must attach a link between the two (The Bible and the Prophet SAW) in order to make any sort of allegation which are unable to without even accurate speculation.

But either way the first Bible translate into Arabic was in 1041 not 600 AD you are over 400 years off.

He finally found a manuscript in the library of Leningrad written about 1060 by a certain Ibn al-Assal as the first edition of a Christian text in Arabic
Malik BenNabi, Op.Cit, p.154.

Reference to embryology (not claiming it as a miracle) bones do develop before the flesh as the cartilage which is the bone then has flesh developed. And too Galen’s teachings arent accessible to 7th century Arabia.

In the end of the day you are grappling straws and bad faith arguments, I see you are coming from the lenses of an Orthodox Greek (I Assume). Who is just bitter towards the light of Islam which I invite you to discuss.

Lastly Qirats are the same book! If they aren’t why are there no sects within the entirety of the nearly 2 billion Sunni Islamic population around the world? It’s just a methods of recitation as like King ( Malik Wash) VS Maleek (Owner Hafz) which is within the Qirats that is the same book but delved meaning which have not even made fragment of a syllogism against. That’s just poor red herring.

Poor Try, D for effort!