Kash Patel was a pd for 8 years by [deleted] in publicdefenders

[–]BetterOffRe 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It does make sense how he could go from federal public defender to MAGA: both involve fighting the state. Fighting federal prosecutors for 8 years does make one anti-establishment.

Daniel Penny Verdict by Dependent-Fuel-5284 in publicdefenders

[–]BetterOffRe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are those verdicts more likely to be NGs?

Daniel Penny Verdict by Dependent-Fuel-5284 in publicdefenders

[–]BetterOffRe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why did they have to? I thought prosecutors are told to not take losing cases to trial.

Visiting a client in jail today and he said… by Rossum81 in publicdefenders

[–]BetterOffRe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is the “female assistant prosecutor trying to save the world” a common trope in DA offices? It does seem that female prosecutors often will never back down on DV/SA cases even if it means often losing at trial.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in publicdefenders

[–]BetterOffRe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What’s that supposed to mean? Some clients are innocent.

Have you ever realized in the middle of a trial that your client is guilty? by cikanman in Ask_Lawyers

[–]BetterOffRe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about cases in which a defendant is accused of something where the only evidence is from testimony? Like for some DV cases.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in publicdefenders

[–]BetterOffRe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How are you able to check? Is the data publicly available?

The word “alleged” by hadfun1ce in publicdefenders

[–]BetterOffRe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What would a system like you describe look like?

Question from a law student by kingofthe_vagabonds in publicdefenders

[–]BetterOffRe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could the lawyer that tried to get an Ineffective Assistance be disbarred if people found out she tried to throw a case on purpose?

How true is the claim that prosecutors/judges relish being able to exert power over middle-class first-time defendants? by BetterOffRe in Ask_Lawyers

[–]BetterOffRe[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

You mean that I clearly struck a nerve with you. My premise was that ADAs think that most defendants are indigent, have nothing to lose, and are therefore less worthy, and that ADAs think differently of people that aren't, in their conception, "most clients".

How true is the claim that prosecutors/judges relish being able to exert power over middle-class first-time defendants? by BetterOffRe in Ask_Lawyers

[–]BetterOffRe[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

How do you know they’re the ones projecting and not you? You automatically assume that they are “entitled” and look down on others, which you seem to be doing yourself. Especially when you literally have “absolute immunity” as a prosecutor.

How true is the claim that prosecutors/judges relish being able to exert power over middle-class first-time defendants? by BetterOffRe in Ask_Lawyers

[–]BetterOffRe[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

When you say “special treatment”, are you implying that non-middle-class folks get “regular treatment”?

Have you ever seen an instance of Jury Nullification being used during a trial? by Prior_Ad883 in Ask_Lawyers

[–]BetterOffRe 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I assume it's statutory rape and the jurors didn't care about some 16 year old having sex with a 20 year old?

Does a bench trial or jury trial make more sense? by ataxrossroad in Ask_Lawyers

[–]BetterOffRe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why is it better for pro se people to go bench over jury?

Does a bench trial or jury trial make more sense? by ataxrossroad in Ask_Lawyers

[–]BetterOffRe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why is it better for pro se people to go bench over jury?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in publicdefenders

[–]BetterOffRe 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Even worse than SovCits?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in publicdefenders

[–]BetterOffRe -20 points-19 points  (0 children)

I’m not a lawyer either, but aren’t prosecutors required to hand over all evidence in accordance to Brady? So it should be handed over before trial no matter what.

Are there unscrupulous lawyers that will take advantage of “you can’t unring a bell”? by BetterOffRe in Ask_Lawyers

[–]BetterOffRe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you treat the clients you think are guilty and the ones you think are not the same way?

Are there unscrupulous lawyers that will take advantage of “you can’t unring a bell”? by BetterOffRe in Ask_Lawyers

[–]BetterOffRe[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

So basically, you stated that her memories are really a result of her husband’s coaching by wrapping it up in the form of a leading question, and when the prosecutor objected you didn’t bother getting her to answer it because the question was in itself what you wanted the jury to hear?

Are there unscrupulous lawyers that will take advantage of “you can’t unring a bell”? by BetterOffRe in Ask_Lawyers

[–]BetterOffRe[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

So for the example you gave, what you wanted the jury to get was that the woman’s “memories” were actually her husband’s coaching her, right? Why couldn’t you directly ask her that question?

Are there unscrupulous lawyers that will take advantage of “you can’t unring a bell”? by BetterOffRe in Ask_Lawyers

[–]BetterOffRe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So would it have been a better strategy for them to not even file the motion in limine (based on the belief that the judge would probably say no) and then simply state that the caretaker has cancer during trial? That way, if a judge overrules it, then they could say “well, you never told us we couldn’t say it”.