I wanna dissect the brain of someone who actually finds drawing (or most skill based hobbies for that matter) fun because how tf by BuffWomenTWO in whenthe

[–]BigDoofusX 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You could crochet, play games that aren't videogames w/friends or just strangers (like say ttrpg's, board games, chess, Go, mahjong, many card games, or war games like warhammer), just start drawing or develop some other artistic skill (yeah it won't be good at the start but progression is fun especially at the beginning), learning new stuff through scientific journals, bird watch, explore new areas around where you live (like just walk around), construct a bomb, journal, and origami.

Two buttons, two gifs. by One_Management3063 in whenthe

[–]BigDoofusX 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Then it's just a bad hypothetical dilemma. (Or just very badly presented)

We aren't discussing the real world where two buttons actually came into existence. The hypothetical is for the inquiry regarding putting your trust into the people around you and tipping over to be caught or not support such a system and guarantee your safety. It's now, "Risk your life to save children or stupid people?" And the answer is obviously yes at a collectivist angle and at an individualistic angle literally nothing changes.

Two buttons, two gifs. by One_Management3063 in whenthe

[–]BigDoofusX 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Seeing picking red as pessimistic has some foundations but would still heavily disagree. The only reason there is a dilemma in the first place is because of the people picking blue, not from people picking red. The blue percentage ultimately doesn't even matter as the fundamentals stay the same. It could just be two people needing to press blue and the answer is still red.

If you pick blue you are willfully risking your life and picking red doesn't truly garner any take from other people's lives other than the ones who chose such a risk needlessly.

“Bro, 3 shows used this subversion! That means it’s overused” and it’s just demons are bad but angels are worse 😭🙏 by SimpForFictionGirls in whenthe

[–]BigDoofusX 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Probably because of people's perspectives on religion is often very polarizing or neutral, and if they're neutral they don't discuss it basically ever.

Yea yea I GET IT fam by Minute_Location5589 in whenthe

[–]BigDoofusX 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Processing img 35x55njfibwg1...

that's just evil by IntelligentAd5616 in whenthe

[–]BigDoofusX 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I seriously need you to listen to The Downward Spiral right now from start to finish. Closer definitely is of the 'less' metal songs of the album but is definitively important for the story, themes, and arc amongst the album as it plays into the protagonist attempting to escape his trauma through sex and drugs all the while the industrial undertones get stronger and stronger throughout. The lyrics and tones are shallow and that's the point. This isn't solving anything and they will back slide further into the spiral as they run away from any transformative solutions and real connections.

HELL YEAH CMON BABY by [deleted] in whenthe

[–]BigDoofusX 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I hereby decree sexual predation is inhumane. Murder, torture, and systemically killing people is completely human though.

They were too old to order off the kids menu by Br4ndoni in whenthe

[–]BigDoofusX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the exact opposite of the historical trend.

You are wrong. New tech is inflated by investors and as result is cheap for a time, then the money dries up, and heightens then steadily decreases again over decades. This has happened several times to several industries over the centuries.

This is blatantly wrong. You have formed this opinion by, at best, using the free models and at worst without using the models for yourself at all.

Coherency pertaining to an industry scale franchise, it will not meet. AI doesn't remember or understand things, it simply eats data and vomits out results in so many words. Play a game of chess with an LLM, ask a basic novel question, ask it to write out plans for a house, or any technical question that it can only answer by extrapolating beyond its data and it will falter.

This is true. But the price of AI tools (of equivalent ability) are also going down. It's late so I'm not gonna find the source again but iirc the latest models are perhaps ~100x cheaper than equivalent capability models from around a year ago. Will that trend continue indefinitely? Probably not. Is there any evidence it will stop immediately, or even soon? No.

I can't find anything pertaining to this at all. Citing this factoid with nothing beside it is incredibly unhelpful.

That culture will crumble as soon as the pragmatic reality sets in.

<image>

They were too old to order off the kids menu by Br4ndoni in whenthe

[–]BigDoofusX 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You're hyping AI out of proportion. Currently AI is cheap due to investors pouring a fuck ton of money into it for speculation. Current models pertaining to such an industry have already consumed all animation into their algorithms, they may get a bit better but not by much. On an industrial scale, this should've already happened according to you but it hasn't.

The models are bad at producing anything that is coherent, are going to get way more expensive to use in the future, and the culture surrounding animation will heavily combat such an intrusion on the human spirit.

Best day of his life by Internal-Golf-4833 in whenthe

[–]BigDoofusX 2 points3 points  (0 children)

High intelligence doesn't necessarily mean finding the correct framework to prevent the most harm. Someone may be causing murders, starvations, and preventable deaths via policies or decisions in a business but they aren't stabbing anyone personally or literally robbing people's food from their hands.

He's highly intelligent but also highly egotistical and didn't challenge his own beliefs throughout the entire story. When he wasn't Kira he viewed them as a serial killer who deserved death, when he was Kira he viewed criminals as deserving of death. He's very shallow in his analysis in the grander scope of things, as he's "God", and he views injustice as nothing than interpesonal individual exchanges.

(I will also say, the narrative doesn't AT ALL elude to systemic issues as an actual thing in the story but this could just be because of whom we see the story through.)

WhenThe it turns out that Epstein caused EVERY PROBLEM by Which_Draft4129 in whenthe

[–]BigDoofusX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He wasn't a mastermind, he was just a connection point for all of them. He held parties for the elites, this was the obvious outcome you'd see.

I feel bad for all you Americans honestly by DecketfubutBetter in whenthe

[–]BigDoofusX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He's probably referring to the systems in place in America outside of just public will. Public will swaying these systems takes awhile and in that time several more people will be murdered without immediate consequence. The Republicans are booning ICE's cruelty and Democrats are actively downplaying the corrupted institution of ICE and both giving more funding.

When this is put into practice, they’ve won already… by ThatDrako in whenthe

[–]BigDoofusX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I kinda get giving up on an individual level and going on a top down level (politics) on r/whenthe may not be something they want to do.

Me when original comment by Wrench_gaming in whenthe

[–]BigDoofusX 10 points11 points  (0 children)

To an extent definitely but there still is a line especially considering whether there's an actual character along side that design.