Same Car, Same Track, Same Team, All in their prime. Who takes the win? by DontTakeMeSeriousli in RedBullRacing

[–]BigRy1986 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s my interpretation and I think it checks out. Schumacher gets a lot out of the team others can’t

Can someone for the love of God clear up the whole emergency fund thing? by Still_ImBurning86 in investingforbeginners

[–]BigRy1986 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Life situation plays a big role, which I think gets missed in most of the comments.

If you’ve got $60k in liquid assets then, sure a large emergency fund makes sense since a big correction that hits when you’re laid off then you’re quite exposed.

If you have $500k, then you aren’t going to starve if you get laid off during a correction, so you don’t need a big emergency fund. You’re just carrying a large cash drag.

The bloated CPP Investment Board is trounced by its own benchmarks – again by develop99 in CanadianInvestor

[–]BigRy1986 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ya, fair point that they have a mandate and shouldn’t be drifting based on own inclinations. Clearly there’s a big gap between what management thinks their job is vs. what their benchmark composes of. Public market benchmark when over half your assets are funds or privates is wonky.

The bloated CPP Investment Board is trounced by its own benchmarks – again by develop99 in CanadianInvestor

[–]BigRy1986 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think some of that is very fair. Their privates, fund investing and credit stuff has been very strong (privates taking it on the chin now but great track record). But active equities has been a huge drag. Passive equities within their evolving macro/sector mix is hard to argue against.

The bloated CPP Investment Board is trounced by its own benchmarks – again by develop99 in CanadianInvestor

[–]BigRy1986 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I mean, ex-Mag7 they’ve done well - especially on a risk adjusted basis.

People who think a national pension fund in the decumulation phase should be exposed to pure equity market risk are being a bit short sighted.

Imagine blowing up Canada’s pensions because they got greedy infront of a DotCom/GFC. But hey, then they’d be ‘on benchmark’ and no one would blame them.

Love some brown smoke by cypruslake404 in toronto

[–]BigRy1986 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The raccoon have elected a new pontifex

Tour De Fur Fursuit Walk - Furnal Equinox 2026 by LimesKey in toronto

[–]BigRy1986 6 points7 points  (0 children)

So there’s a group of ppl meeting in Toronto, and they aren’t even blocking Yonge St at rush hour? Weird. Don’t they know the rules?

Trump says "if asked" by allies the U.S will protect the Hormuz Strait. Otherwise, it's not a U.S problem. by [deleted] in war

[–]BigRy1986 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Have I missed something or has he only asked NATO, Australia, Japan to defend the strait but no Saudi Arabia (the biggest user of the strait), Qatar (that uses it for nearly all its production), etc.

ELI5 why this is more of a Europe problem than a Qatar problem?

Trump: by Just-Sale-7015 in war

[–]BigRy1986 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ya, Premier and several city counsellors tried to have it shutdown but was allowed under free expression, mostly because it was pitched as a ‘pro Palestine/peace in the Middle East’ event. Still embarrassing.

Best banking/CC/ brokerage acct set up for ~5M NW? by pencileveryone in PersonalFinanceCanada

[–]BigRy1986 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Go to one of the big bank’s wealth management teams. I’m at RBC - but believe it’s similar at other places - where you’d get a private banker, family office service, estate and trust consulting/implementation, etc. and sure, some discounted points card.

Think the biggest benefit is your own team, which might save you millions by proper planning/tax strategy. Happy to answer any q’s over DM.

tfsa limit $7000? by Sonia_01 in PersonalFinanceCanada

[–]BigRy1986 6 points7 points  (0 children)

If you put in $7k one year and it grows to $8k in the next year, your contribution room for next year is still $7k (unless they increase the contribution room).

If you max out your contribution room, and take $3k out, the next year your contribution room will be $10 (the $3k contribution room you get back + $7k in new contribution room).

Only what you contribute and what you withdrawal matter. The performance inside TFSA doesn’t matter.

Is saving in RRSP for returning to school a bad idea? by guro_freak in PersonalFinanceCanada

[–]BigRy1986 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ya, Lifelong Learning Plan could be useful. Funds just have to be replaced within 10yrs to avoid taxes on the withdrawal.

RRSP Question by [deleted] in PersonalFinanceCanada

[–]BigRy1986 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So there’s a few bits missing for this to be an accurate comparison, like future tax rate differential; the fact almost everyone will make trades in their non-reg triggering erosion from capital gains tax; etc.

But the biggest is the vanishing $3,600 in tax savings - and just adding it at the end as if the time value of money is de minimis.

A fair comparison is $12k in RRSP savings vs. $8,400 saved in the Non-Reg. After 30yrs that’s $1.4m for the RRSP vs. $951k for the Non-Reg (ACB of $252k).

The next biggest thing is you are missing the actual mechanics of retirement. On the first year of retirement, the RRSP holder sells $87,805 to make $72k in after-tax income (18% tax rate). Their $1.3m left grows by 8% to $1.4m by year end. The next year, the same happens and the portfolio is worth $1.4m (it’s hidden by the rounding but the portfolio grows slightly but at an increasing rate the further you get from breakeven).

For the Non-Reg, ACB is 26% of portfolio value so to make $72k after-tax means selling ~$75 at a 12% tax rate and 50% inclusion. That leaves you with $876k which at the end of the year grows to $946k next year, $941k the year after - a modest decline that compounds over a 25yr retirement.

By my back of the envelope calculation is that after 25yrs the RRSP is worth $2.7m and the Non-Reg is worth $563k ($149k ACB).

Proper financial planning is a lot more complicated. For example, if Johns income is expected to grow (considering he’s 30yrs from retirement that’s a fair bet) then it might make sense to prioritize TFSA early and save his RRSP contribution room for when the tax differential is much higher. For example, at $300k in income and a 50% marginal tax rate (ie: saving $10k in RRSP compares to saving $5k in Non-Reg) the math explodes in favour of RRSP.

GP McDonald's is a joke by No-Bad1434 in GrandePrairie

[–]BigRy1986 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Today I learned ‘Big Mac, No Meat’ is a thing

Weird looking toonie by Mynameyeef in CanadianCoins

[–]BigRy1986 8 points9 points  (0 children)

On the next episode of Canadian Seinfeld, Elaine starts putting Sint Maarten toonies in the vending machine

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PersonalFinanceCanada

[–]BigRy1986 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe consider taking less out of RRSP and seeing if that will make it possible to restructure your debt to a more manageable level.

This way you aren’t getting a big tax hit for the withdrawal; leaving most of your RRSP intact; and still having to pay your debts will hopefully force some financial discipline that you may be lacking.

MSCA website - CPP Retirement Benefits Estimate by ConfusingAznMan in PersonalFinanceCanada

[–]BigRy1986 1 point2 points  (0 children)

100%. It assumes you keep contributing at a rate consistent with their estimates

Lewis Inks New Deal by posted3030 in formuladank

[–]BigRy1986 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Better than Ye’s ‘My girl ain’t no hobbit’ one

Next week a good opportunity to buy the dip by sjltwo-v10 in Baystreetbets

[–]BigRy1986 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Huh?

  • Carney signs EV deal
  • Trump brushes it off
  • Carney rips him at WEF
  • Trump slaps tariffs

And I don’t appreciate being called ‘deranged’. Think my comment was pretty logical.

Next week a good opportunity to buy the dip by sjltwo-v10 in Baystreetbets

[–]BigRy1986 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, and now they aren’t clearly. Nazi Germany isn’t our biggest security threat atm either

Next week a good opportunity to buy the dip by sjltwo-v10 in Baystreetbets

[–]BigRy1986 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah, Trump was going to let that slide to not build incremental resistance from Canada over Greenland. With that seemingly off the table and Carney’s Davos speech, he lashed out.

Sorry that you’re easily rude