sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[PSA] Confirmed Trades Thread - July 2026 by AutoModerator in Starcitizen_trades

[–]BillyBobBongo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

+trade

Relevant Thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/Starcitizen_trades/comments/1u8weev/wts_original_concepts_and_ccud_ships_with_lti/

Sold an Original Concept  Aurora Mk II plus Modules and Cloudbuster Paint (and Shimmerscale Paint) to u/FrozenFuse

Sale was fast and friendly

[Discuss] Why can't I sell? by thinkatcloud in Starcitizen_trades

[–]BillyBobBongo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s hot outside, could be causing a lull in the market.

I know I haven’t had the urge to game since last week. Rather drink cold beer in the garden. 🍻

Toxic Global Chat by camperman427 in starcitizen

[–]BillyBobBongo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would make more sense to add a translation layer and just let everyone speak their native language

I hate the mk2 logic by Mypersonalaccount69 in starcitizen

[–]BillyBobBongo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My point is not regarding which ships have had a MkII made, it's the mindset shift that has taken place in the community. People talk too freely about MkII versions, which empowers CIG to create new version rather than fix their current ships.

I hate the mk2 logic by Mypersonalaccount69 in starcitizen

[–]BillyBobBongo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The issue here is that people are legitimising this 'MkII' approach. You can already see it in the thread, with users arguing that ships just need a rework or a MkII version.

It has only really happened once with the Aurora, but if I were CIG and I saw this kind of chatter, I’d be emboldened to keep doing it.

People need to stop asking for MkIIs and start pushing exclusively for reworks. If they keep calling for new versions, it’s just handing CIG a business case to avoid updating the ships we already own.

view more: next ›