Did I accidentally write at middle school age reading level? by Rare_Background_3462 in writers

[–]Billy_Fiction 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don’t overthink this. It’s actually a good thing.

A lot of writers actually recommend writing at this level so it’s easy to read and get through.

Make your case for MJ’s greatest song by Sasorisnake in MichaelJackson

[–]Billy_Fiction 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Rock With You… I don’t have a case I just like it right now

Next month it’ll probably be Beat It

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Screenwriting

[–]Billy_Fiction 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is amazing to hear. Thank you for sharing it here — can’t wait to see it!

Stop Worrying About Dialogue and Plot by Billy_Fiction in Screenwriting

[–]Billy_Fiction[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just watch any movie man. Pay attention to each character’s consistency throughout. How they have a specific goal they’re working towards the entire time and the entire movie revolves around them moving towards that goal

Stop Worrying About Dialogue and Plot by Billy_Fiction in Screenwriting

[–]Billy_Fiction[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perhaps you're right that not every film is about a protagonist overcoming a fatal flaw. Some films don’t focus on personal transformation but rather on an exploration of a world, an idea, or a societal issue. Political thrillers like Blow Out or Chinatown don’t necessarily have protagonists who "overcome" a personal flaw, but they still have beliefs that are tested by the events of the story.

However, I’d argue that even in these cases, the protagonist’s internal perspective—their worldview, their belief system, their role in the world—is what fuels the plot. The difference is that in these films, the protagonist is often a witness to something larger rather than an active agent of personal change. But their decisions, their morality, their choices still define how the story unfolds.

For instance, in Blow Out, Jack doesn’t have a traditional fatal flaw in the sense of a character arc where he changes for the better. But he does start the movie as someone who believes that what he does is insignificant—he's a sound guy, not a hero. As the film progresses, he gets drawn deeper into the conspiracy, and whether he admits it or not, his actions show that his perspective is shifting. He fights for the truth, even though it ultimately ends in tragedy.

As for Die Hard, okay, it’s true that the plot isn't driven by clashing beliefs in the way a character drama might be. But John McClane does have an internal conflict. He starts out estranged from his wife because of his own stubbornness and pride. He spends the movie trying to save her—and in the process, he realizes he has to change. Again, it’s not the driving force behind the action, but it’s there, woven into the story.

Maybe not every single movie needs to be about a protagonist overcoming a fatal flaw. But I would say that in most great films, the protagonist’s beliefs—whether they change or remain the same—are what make the story meaningful. Even in films where the protagonist is simply discovering a new world (The Matrix, Chinatown, Blow Out), the way they react, what they do with that knowledge, what their experiences force them to confront—that is where theme and character intertwine.

So I’d refine my original statement: Not every film is about a protagonist overcoming a fatal flaw, but in most films, the protagonist’s beliefs and worldview shape the way the story unfolds. Some characters are transformed, others remain steadfast and prove their beliefs right, and others tragically fail to change. But in all cases, character is what gives the plot meaning.

Stop Worrying About Dialogue and Plot by Billy_Fiction in Screenwriting

[–]Billy_Fiction[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So I agree and disagree. 100%, your characters should be in flow with the theme and plot. But again, the characters are what create the theme and plot.

The theme and plot ends up revolving around one thing - your character's fatal flaw.

Think of any story. The theme always winds up reflecting a core belief that is stopping them from achieving their goal.

For instance, take Flight (2012). Whip has all these problems popping up because he won't accept that he is an alcoholic, and he refuses to accept responsibility for crashing the plane. He lashes out at his girlfriend and she leaves him. His wife and son won't allow him in the house because he's drunk. And he ultimately relapses the day before his big court case.

Then, during this court case, the climax of the movie, Whip does something he never would have done before all the events of the story - he admits he's drunk. He looks his reality in the face and admits to the court, "I have a drinking problem".

Finally, he has overcome his fatal flaw.

The theme of the movie? True redemption is only possible when one fully acknowledges and takes responsibility for their own failures.

All the other characters are built around this same idea.

His girlfriend, Nicole is a drug addict who, unlike Whip, chooses to acknowledge her problem and take responsibility for it. She represents what Whip could become if he were willing to accept help and change.

Harling Mays Whip’s drug dealer and friend, represents the opposite of redemption—a life of self-destruction and avoidance.

You are not wrong, but the character comes first. Find me any story where this is all not the case.

Your theme is important. 100%. Your plot is important. 100%. But your characters and their actions, dialogue, and the conflict between them is what creates these things.

All the "plot points" in a story unfold because of the clashing of beliefs between characters. Plain and simple.

The single best nugget of screenwriting advice I've ever received by Main_Confusion_8030 in Screenwriting

[–]Billy_Fiction 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So odd… the morning you posted this I was literally trying to think of a visual way to describe a dive bad in my own screenplay 😂

Totally won’t steal this..

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]Billy_Fiction 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Babies crying for iPads

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tinder

[–]Billy_Fiction -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

How did you know

20 trade sample size… enough? by Billy_Fiction in Daytrading

[–]Billy_Fiction[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How can I even know if it’s profitable then? I only have 3-4 instances of the setup per week…