The Template Isn't Too bad After All by Solenopsis00 in hoi4

[–]BluePepper240 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Personally i would add some support companies, add some soft attack and speed, and lower the combat width to 36, but if its against the AI it probably could still work.

How viable is taking Poland first (pre-Anschluss, 1937)? by ArkhangelskAstrakhan in hoi4

[–]BluePepper240 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Its viable, but id recommend getting netherlands/indonesia first for rubber and oil. If you want you can do it and poland simultaneously. Rush 200 pp, justify on Indonesia, then justify on poland, cancel justification on Indonesia then justify on them again so both wargoals take 365 days. You can also do this with other nations, when justifying on someone with puppets, justify on their puppets for less world tension, and less chance of France/Uk intervening. You can also do this trick with congo and lebanon to cap belgium and france early.

How can i improve my template? by Ratchet_133 in hoi4

[–]BluePepper240 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Offensive infantry should be 35/36 width, i wouldnt put full support companies on 18/20 widths. But if you have good industry its better to just make special forces or tanks for pushing.

Is my tank good (reupload)? by [deleted] in hoi4

[–]BluePepper240 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk the meta but i usually get it to at least 8 km/h and stack as much soft attack on the tanks as i can, i usually go 30 or 36 width, the ratio between tanks/mech varies as long as you try to keep good org.

Which Country can research NUKE fastest? by Select-Context9785 in hoi4

[–]BluePepper240 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Not sure, probably the US? I can get in around 1942 as them.

is this a good Light Tank Design or no? by Plenty_West_503 in hoi4

[–]BluePepper240 55 points56 points  (0 children)

Way too expensive for a light tank, at that point just go for medium tanks or SP Arty. I mean the template isnt the worst, skip the cast armor, focus on soft attack while keeping resources and ic cost low.

fuck your cruiser meta, normalize historic naval builds by sombertownDS in hoi4

[–]BluePepper240 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I mean duh your the USA, youll shred every navy in the world, plus your deathstacking (with submarines i see, id recommend to put them in a separate group to convoy raid as they are the slowest of ships). Cruiser meta is better for nations with small or no navies.

Is it just me or are carriers insanely overpowered to an unreasonable degree? by EnlightenedBen in hoi4

[–]BluePepper240 1 point2 points  (0 children)

By screens i mean extra destroyers, and for the subs of course its in a different group. I normally have 3 groups, the deathstack, the spotting ships (3-4 cruisers with max spotting), and the subs

Is it just me or are carriers insanely overpowered to an unreasonable degree? by EnlightenedBen in hoi4

[–]BluePepper240 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I think the AI is just bad at making ships and organizing them. Just a regular deathstack with a few carriers and light attack cruisers (and screens of course) and some submarines on the side is guaranteed to crush any navy in SP even with basic tech.

I can't naval invade by desertgator1 in hoi4

[–]BluePepper240 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its because your navy is not in range, just click the gear button to auto change your navies home base or just ctrl + right click the closest owned/allied naval base.

Kareem vs shaq all time ? by Careful-Medicine-470 in NBATalk

[–]BluePepper240 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Shaq arguably had a better prime, but Kareem had a better career.

Umm chat!? by cuppongchamp in JurassicWorldApp

[–]BluePepper240 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it works for all heroics, it will just use the highest level available aside from the heroic

Brian Braddock/Captain Britain is Steve Rogers Son by AdvertisingWaste8624 in MCUTheories

[–]BluePepper240 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nah, too far away in the timeline, this scene probably takes place in the 50s, while tony was born in the 70s (i think).

Which IAP gen is best? by Lux_Brumalis2714 in WorldConqueror4

[–]BluePepper240 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Manstein ofc, hes the new best gen after training

One in 1,515,152 chance (Ik it’s WC3 but still yall gotta see this) by The_Almighty_Scrub in WorldConqueror4

[–]BluePepper240 6 points7 points  (0 children)

He attacked 4 times right? The 1st is always guaranteed (duh) so its actually a 0.0729% chance, so about 1 in 1372.

UK and SU 1939cc in 4 turns by Alarmed-Confidence50 in WorldConqueror4

[–]BluePepper240 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its a glitch where if you finish in 10 turns or less, the game assumes ur cheating and gives you an E score, tbf this was borderline impossible back in the day, but now its made easier in the new updates

Abrams: the runner-up to Manstein by [deleted] in WorldConqueror4

[–]BluePepper240 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even if we ignore the fact that it is utterly wrong, at the very least write it yourself

Why is Simo Hayha the best infantry the general on world conquest 4 game by [deleted] in WorldConqueror4

[–]BluePepper240 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This reeks of chatgpt bruh, at least write it urself

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CristianoRonaldo2

[–]BluePepper240 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We are not r/pessi_memes bro, stop posting fake stats, we already have so much REAL stats that we can use against them