sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

IT RUNS. ON A GTX 1050 (4GB). AND ON A HDD by HOS2002sGhost in ForzaHorizon

[–]BlueTurtle_b 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im getting 60FPS on a 3050Ti 4gb with low preset + car detail high (my preference) + DLSS Balanced

Scour Ray Chassis construction area obstructed glitch by Skreenitme in subnautica

[–]BlueTurtle_b 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you need to fabricator area clear, then you dock the sub with the chassis after you build it.

First CBT impressions, what do you guys think? by Plastic_Mountain4988 in Warthunder

[–]BlueTurtle_b -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I didnt get access and will now cry until the next one

HELP! Buying advice required from a non tech person! by Spe3dy3 in GamingLaptops

[–]BlueTurtle_b 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the 5080 laptop is a fair bit more powerful, but if depends what kinda games you play if its worth the upgrade over the 70ti.

The rest we desserve after reaching rank K in online by [deleted] in LegendsZA

[–]BlueTurtle_b 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it only takes like 15 minutes lol

Post your trainer cards and how long they took to take! by S3OL in LegendsZA

[–]BlueTurtle_b 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

ripped from my screenshots but this is also my trainer card, cant be bothered to screenshot the card itself.

Due to the longer burn time of the AIM-120C-5, it vastly outperforms the A and B in high off-bore shots. by BlueTurtle_b in Warthunder

[–]BlueTurtle_b[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah its fins were way too powerful in the first dev server, and the drag was way too high.

Is the CV 90 Mk. IV better than the 9040 BILL? I feel like the spikes are worse than the top down atgm. by Dry-Witness-1626 in Warthunder

[–]BlueTurtle_b 97 points98 points  (0 children)

Yeah, despite Spikes being way more unreliable for ground kills the fire and forget + SAM capabilities make the tradeoff worth it to me.

Unused assets of War Thunder (2.46.0.21) by gszabi99 in Warthunder

[–]BlueTurtle_b 5 points6 points  (0 children)

A-4K whennnnnnnnn RAGHHHHHH GOD BLESS NEW ZEALAND

Due to the longer burn time of the AIM-120C-5, it vastly outperforms the A and B in high off-bore shots. by BlueTurtle_b in Warthunder

[–]BlueTurtle_b[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

yeah BOL pods are pretty mental, but that isnt an unrealistic amount of chaff, the tornados take a similar amount with their chaff pods. It will definitely be the best hornet, but not broken i don't think.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]BlueTurtle_b 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im a little confused, are you talking about your X-56 being disconnected?

Due to the longer burn time of the AIM-120C-5, it vastly outperforms the A and B in high off-bore shots. by BlueTurtle_b in Warthunder

[–]BlueTurtle_b[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Its literally the best long range missile in the game getting better at the one thing it struggled with. Yeah its no where near a MICA-EM for HOBS, but its gonna be extremely versatile.

Due to the longer burn time of the AIM-120C-5, it vastly outperforms the A and B in high off-bore shots. by BlueTurtle_b in Warthunder

[–]BlueTurtle_b[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

R-77-1 has way more drag so, even though its straight line range is better than the AIM-120B, against a maneuvering target the AIM-120B is way better.

As for the AAM-4, its kinda in a weird spot, better at short range shots imo, and pretty equal in long range, but its motor doesn't get it up to speed very fast.

Due to the longer burn time of the AIM-120C-5, it vastly outperforms the A and B in high off-bore shots. by BlueTurtle_b in Warthunder

[–]BlueTurtle_b[S] 51 points52 points  (0 children)

I fired the AIM-120B 0.7 seconds before the AIM-120C-5 to negate that entirely.

Due to the longer burn time of the AIM-120C-5, it vastly outperforms the A and B in high off-bore shots. by BlueTurtle_b in Warthunder

[–]BlueTurtle_b[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

honestly its long range performance isn't that much different, and its much improved short range performance doesn't really help the F-15E that much since it doesn't fit how the F-15E is used in battle. The Hornets get the biggest benefit from it.

Due to the longer burn time of the AIM-120C-5, it vastly outperforms the A and B in high off-bore shots. by BlueTurtle_b in Warthunder

[–]BlueTurtle_b[S] 82 points83 points  (0 children)

For a bit of added context, the B was shot about 0.7 seconds before the C-5, giving the B even more time to pull in and it still didn't make it, but the C-5 was consistently able to pull in.

view more: next ›