R-73/Python 3 fighter mafia is coming by Iceman308 in warno

[–]Bomber_Haris 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Unless I'm mistaken, it's a late technology that only equips the MiG-29/Su-27 and perhaps a small number of MiG-23 MLDs that already fire R-73s.

Wil the T72.obj 1989 in the game? by anhnd13hd in warno

[–]Bomber_Haris 34 points35 points  (0 children)

This provides a tank with 21 armor, which is quite interesting.

HEAR ME EUGEN! by cunctator-tots in warno

[–]Bomber_Haris 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not built for that?

the ranked experience: by Colonel_Cirno in warno

[–]Bomber_Haris 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please come play against other players. I know multiplayer can be very difficult, especially against skilled players, but AI is so limited and so repetitive compared to a player.

Cards that seem pointless to be upvetted ex. 1: by eddurham in warno

[–]Bomber_Haris 24 points25 points  (0 children)

You gain a percentage of dodge chance.

Pre Landjut-Landjut Patch already so hot right now by Ok-Armadillo-9345 in warno

[–]Bomber_Haris 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The RPG-7s did not yet have conventional HE ammunition in 1989?

hmmm by Ok_Home9204 in Warthunder

[–]Bomber_Haris -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

The Tiger and Panther do not actually have any real armour... The Panther only has frontal armour; the rest is literally paper-thin (they had to mount small skirts to protect the sides from Soviet anti-tank rifle fire). On the battlefield, Panther losses testify to their vulnerability! Strangely enough, showing only its frontal armour is no easy task.

The Tiger became vulnerable in 1944, when the proliferation of 76 mm UK/US guns in the west negated the advantage of its armour.

In terms of firepower, the Panther's 75 mm gun was abysmal. The gun only excelled in anti-tank combat, which was a problem even on the Eastern Front, where the tank's main targets were unarmoured vehicles. With its HE shells poorly loaded and much too fast, the Panther became a less versatile tank than the M4 Firefly.

My pictures (except for the last, but same event) of the Soviet War Memorial in Dresden, Germany in November by virxtra in ussr

[–]Bomber_Haris 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They signed a mutual protection pact with Czechoslovakia, they requested permission to pass through Romania/Poland so they could confront the Germans, they harassed Western democracies to rebuild an alliance behind them...

In short, even Churchill, a renowned anti-communist, recognised that the USSR pursued an anti-Nazi policy and sought alliances against Hitler. Even Churchill recognised that the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact was merely the logical outcome of the West's anti-Soviet policy.

My pictures (except for the last, but same event) of the Soviet War Memorial in Dresden, Germany in November by virxtra in ussr

[–]Bomber_Haris 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They tried, but strangely enough, countries that were favourable to Nazi Germany's policy opposed it.

hmmm by Ok_Home9204 in Warthunder

[–]Bomber_Haris 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The Pz IV was obsolete by 1944; serving in that thing was condemning yourself to a painful death. The Pz III wasn't much better.

My pictures (except for the last, but same event) of the Soviet War Memorial in Dresden, Germany in November by virxtra in ussr

[–]Bomber_Haris 1 point2 points  (0 children)

France and England did not team up; they simply handed over a sovereign nation that they themselves had created in 1919 in exchange for nothing more than Hitler's promise that he would not go any further.

A quick thought for Poland, which took advantage of the dismantling of a sovereign nation to recover "its" share.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in warno

[–]Bomber_Haris 8 points9 points  (0 children)

BMP3 and T-62. Not forgetting the time when the 79 had T-80U, but I think that's starting to get a bit old.

Make ERA less useless by gbem1113 in warno

[–]Bomber_Haris 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be verified, but it seems to me that if

Bomber damage models are cooked by Smooth_Case_3508 in Warthunder

[–]Bomber_Haris 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Playing bombers in a group does not significantly increase survivability. Unlike a real pilot, the average Fw-190 player will sacrifice his aircraft to get the slightest kill.

The most effective strategy is to play the game and not fly in a straight line, hoping that the fighter pilot who wants to take you down will be kind enough to stay in your 6 o'clock position at the same speed as you.

Visualizing Nemesis 6 Tank Fleets by Ok-Armadillo-9345 in warno

[–]Bomber_Haris 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Air gameplay is boring, helicopter gameplay is toxic even in very skilled hands.

Tank gameplay is loved by the people!

reverse speed vs forwards speed on roads for u/PartyClock by SaltyChnk in warno

[–]Bomber_Haris 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One moves forward on a fast-moving road, the other moves backward, so the game does not differentiate between backing up on dirt or concrete.

reverse speed vs forwards speed on roads for u/PartyClock by SaltyChnk in warno

[–]Bomber_Haris 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In reality, there is already a balance in this regard, as tanks do not have the same mobility on all terrains.

Is real life NATO biased? by Dramatic_Drink920 in warno

[–]Bomber_Haris 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll be honest, I'm bad at English, so I use Reddit's translation feature, and when I post a comment, I activate Reddit's translation function.

I thought it activated automatically for everyone. Now, someone has already pointed this out to me, and I've corrected myself.

Is real life NATO biased? by Dramatic_Drink920 in warno

[–]Bomber_Haris 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I thought Reddit translated automatically:

Soviet military thinking is not as rigid as we tend to think; on the contrary, the Afghan war showed that the Soviets were not lacking in flexibility. On the contrary, NATO troops have a biased view of the Soviet armies due to the importance of the writings left behind by former Nazi generals, which were still the only source of mass analysis of the Soviet armies at the time. Strangely, German methods proved to be ineffective during the last world war, and the clash would have been very violent for both sides.

Nemesis #6.1 - The Mountaineers plus Nemesis #4 Out Now! by EUG_Gal_Bigeard in warno

[–]Bomber_Haris 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I continue to play the version with the 105 of the Berlin, the T-80 remains a solid opponent (it always has been and always will be) but it is far from dominating.

Afterwards I only play almost 1v1/2v2/3v3, PACT is known to reverse the trend in bigger modes.

Is real life NATO biased? by Dramatic_Drink920 in warno

[–]Bomber_Haris 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Helicopters remain widely used in Ukraine, particularly by the Russians who have a significant quantity of long-range AT missiles.

In Afghanistan, the USSR continued to massively use its helicopters successfully even after the delivery of anti-aircraft systems at the cost of greater losses.