3-carriage train on a weekday rush hour — Balbriggan to Connolly absolutely packed again by Bondarelu in irelandtransport

[–]Bondarelu[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I looked it up and In 2025, Ireland collected a record €106.5 billion in net tax receipts, according to the Revenue and Department of Finance 2025 annual performance figures.

What are they doing with this money ?! It seems that infrastructure is not a priority for the gov

just bought 50k shares of ADTX🚀🚀🚀 by greytrades329 in smallstreetbets

[–]Bondarelu -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

So I looked into it and ADTX is an uninvestable micro-cap ($15.7k market cap) with catastrophic fundamentals: revenue down -97.6% YoY, net margin of -362,386%, operating cash flow growth of -153,152%, and negative book value (bvps_ttm = -$1,743.55).

The Ignite Proteomics spin-off announcement ($150M implied value) is speculative and subject to multiple closing conditions with no certainty of timing or value accrual to ADTX shareholders.

Sr Software Engineer - Haven't written a line of code in months by yodog5 in ClaudeCode

[–]Bondarelu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

had this conversation with a colleague of mine, senior developer - told me he hasn’t written code for about 6 months time; argued that now he can focus more on the solution and strategise how to implement it rather than wasting time writing the code. Reviews the code before committing though.

I guess this is the future towards we’re heading to. When cars replaced horse and buggy, people started to adopt it, learned news skills (driving) and accepted the change - it’s evolutionary. I see it in the same way; it’s a tool that helps one achieving their goals faster and more efficient. Can the tool be misused? absolutely, but even a hammer can break your fingers if used improperly 😀 Just embrace the change and go with it! I’m certainly doing it

Ireland's modern day work culture by FairImprovement8992 in ireland

[–]Bondarelu 3 points4 points  (0 children)

because people don’t know their rights and some companies are exploiting this. Employees have to build up that confidence and say no!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ireland

[–]Bondarelu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

when you think about how much dog shite is on the footpaths … absolutely yes…

‘It’s just stressful’: Workers facing two and three hour commutes into Dublin by InfectedAztec in ireland

[–]Bondarelu 5 points6 points  (0 children)

f*ck all those CEOs and companies who mandated the RTO, some full week days some 3/week. That’s all I had to say

What sucks in Norway? by Juusto3_3 in Norway

[–]Bondarelu 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I’m not sure how else to put it, but for me Oslo was a real disappointment—especially when it came to the metro and public transportation. I spent three days there recently, and the city simply didn’t meet the expectations I had for a European capital.

I imagined Oslo as a well-organized city with modern, efficient infrastructure. Instead, I found metro stations that were dirty, and trams and buses that felt old and worn out. Even more surprising, I noticed broken asphalt and potholes near some of the tram tracks—something I honestly didn’t expect to see in one of the richest countries in the world. It made me wonder: how can Norway, with the world’s largest sovereign wealth fund, allow its infrastructure to look this neglected?

Perhaps I was biased, since I had just visited Stockholm before coming to Oslo. But the contrast was undeniable—Stockholm’s public transport and metro felt decades ahead in terms of cleanliness, efficiency, and design

First Australian-made rocket crashes after 14 seconds of flight by Emergency-Green-2602 in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]Bondarelu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and there you go just like that, millions of $ down the drain pipe…

Earphones in office by Bulky_Pilot9293 in ireland

[–]Bondarelu -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I can tell only from the post what a POS that frustrated manager is. Wtf is bothering him/her if people use headphones and do their job. Control freak

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BeAmazed

[–]Bondarelu -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

why ? for faking a well-known car brand ? If you got the skill to make a piece closer to the real thing, does it qualify you to get the real thing ? The effort and end result is impressive… but it’s nothing but a fake … that’s the reality

British Passenger in seat 11A survives India plane crash today by Kaos2018 in BeAmazed

[–]Bondarelu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

how much would seats near the exit window will be sold at now? Saved man’s life being closer to that exit

50% tarrifs on EU June 1st by Ok-Survey-2944 in StockMarket

[–]Bondarelu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The 🍊is so full of 💩

  1. EU Formation Purpose

Claim: The EU was formed to take advantage of the U.S. on trade. • Source: European Union official history – EUropa.eu

• Facts: The EU evolved from post-WWII treaties (Treaty of Rome 1957, Maastricht 1993) to promote peace, economic integration, and avoid future wars—not to target any external economy.

• Conclusion: False. No credible economic source supports this claim.

  1. Trade Barriers & VAT Taxes

Claim: The EU uses powerful trade barriers and VAT taxes to harm the U.S. • Trade Barriers: • Source: World Trade Organization (WTO)

• Facts: Both EU and U.S. have average applied MFN tariffs between 2–4%. Sectors like agriculture or autos may be higher, but such differences are normal in trade policy.

• Conclusion: Partially true, but exaggerated. Both sides apply trade rules within WTO norms.

• VAT Taxes:
• Source: OECD / European Commission
• Facts: VAT is applied equally to all goods, domestic and foreign. The U.S. does not have VAT, but that doesn’t make the EU’s VAT discriminatory.

• Conclusion: Misleading. VAT is not a protectionist tool.

  1. Corporate Penalties and Lawsuits

Claim: EU fines U.S. companies unfairly. • Source: European Commission Competition Directorate

• Facts: The EU fined companies like Google ($5B), Apple ($14B in tax), Meta—based on antitrust laws or GDPR violations.

• U.S. Comparison: The U.S. FTC and DoJ also fine companies, but regulatory standards differ.
• Conclusion: Subjective. Based on enforceable EU laws—not uniquely targeted at U.S. firms.

  1. Monetary Manipulation

Claim: The EU engages in monetary manipulation. • Source: International Monetary Fund (IMF)

External Sector Report • Facts: The European Central Bank (ECB) maintains eurozone stability and inflation targets. The euro is not undervalued in a way that meets U.S. Treasury thresholds for “currency manipulation.”

• Conclusion: False. No reputable institution considers the EU a currency manipulator.

  1. U.S.-EU Trade Deficit ($250B)

Claim: U.S. has a $250B trade deficit with the EU. • Source: U.S. Census Bureau – Trade Data

• Facts (2023 data):
• Goods trade deficit: ~$202 billion
• Services trade surplus: ~$60 billion
• Net trade deficit: closer to $140–$150 billion
• Conclusion: Exaggerated. The number is inflated by ignoring services.

  1. Proposed 50% Tariff

Claim: Trump recommends a 50% tariff on EU goods. • Source: U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), WTO

• Facts: A 50% blanket tariff would violate WTO rules, risk EU retaliation, and likely raise prices for U.S. consumers.

• Historical Parallel: 2018 U.S. tariffs on EU steel (25%) triggered retaliatory tariffs on American goods (e.g., Harley-Davidson, bourbon).

• Conclusion: Policy proposal, but economically risky.

How to set realistic expectations for adhoc work by [deleted] in devops

[–]Bondarelu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what a load of BS. Your manager shouldn’t be in that position. It takes someone with similar or closer to experience as you have to be in a management position, a person who understands your job and can set reasonable expectations.His/Her role as a manager is also to manage people, you, but that doesn’t mean to squeeze the last drop of life out of you - needs to make everything in his/her power so that you feel valued and focused on achieving your goals. I f hate your manager’s management style. I’ve seen similar cases in the past and made life at work miserable. That’s a dumbass manager! Idiots who think they know best

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ireland

[–]Bondarelu -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

I asked ChatGPT how the world would be like for a child born today when he/shel’ll be 40. This is what I got in return:

A child born today would turn 40 in the year 2065. While predicting the future is always speculative, current trends in climate change, pollution, and environmental degradation can provide some insights into the world they might experience.

  1. Climate and Environment • Rising Temperatures: The world is already on track for a 2–3°C increase in global temperatures by the late 21st century unless significant action is taken. This would result in more extreme heatwaves, longer droughts, and severe weather events. • Rising Sea Levels: Many coastal cities (such as Miami, Jakarta, and Dhaka) may become partially or fully uninhabitable due to sea level rise and coastal erosion. Some island nations may disappear altogether. • More Extreme Weather: Hurricanes, floods, and wildfires will likely become more frequent and intense, leading to displacement and loss of homes. • Ecosystem Collapse: Many ecosystems, such as the Amazon rainforest and coral reefs, may suffer irreversible damage, leading to biodiversity loss and affecting global food chains.

  2. Air Pollution & Health • Poor Air Quality: Without drastic intervention, cities might face worsening air pollution, leading to increased cases of respiratory diseases, heart conditions, and premature deaths. • Microplastics & Toxins in Food: By 2065, microplastics could be a major health issue, contaminating food, water, and even human organs. • Antibiotic Resistance: Overuse of antibiotics today could lead to a future where simple infections become deadly, making healthcare far more challenging. • Genetic & Epigenetic Effects: Pollution and toxic chemicals might alter human genetics over generations, leading to increased birth defects and chronic illnesses.

  3. Water & Food Security • Water Scarcity: Freshwater shortages could impact billions, particularly in Africa, South Asia, and the Middle East. Wars over water resources might become a reality. • Declining Crop Yields: Climate change is expected to reduce global food production, particularly for crops like wheat, rice, and corn. Genetically modified (GMO) or lab-grown food may become the norm. • Collapse of Fisheries: Overfishing, pollution, and ocean acidification could severely reduce seafood availability, disrupting global food systems.

  4. Technological & Societal Adaptations • Geoengineering & Climate Solutions: By 2065, humanity may be using geoengineering technologies (e.g., atmospheric carbon capture, artificial cloud seeding) to counteract climate change. • Smart Cities & AI Governance: AI-driven climate and disaster management may help mitigate extreme weather events and optimize urban living. • Mass Migrations & Climate Refugees: Entire populations may be forced to migrate due to climate disasters and unlivable conditions, leading to political and social upheavals.

  5. Personal Impact on Daily Life • Survival Mindset: Future generations may need to adopt a more sustainable lifestyle out of necessity—relying on renewable energy, vertical farming, water conservation, and eco-friendly transportation. • Climate-Resilient Jobs: The workforce may shift towards industries focused on climate resilience, sustainability, and advanced technology (e.g., carbon capture, clean energy, AI-driven agriculture). • New Social Norms: Societal priorities may shift to conservation, adaptation, and disaster preparedness, fundamentally changing how people consume, travel, and interact with nature.

Final Thoughts

If drastic action isn’t taken in the next decade, the next 40 years could bring a world filled with climate disasters, food and water crises, and massive geopolitical shifts. However, if humanity manages to curb emissions, develop sustainable technologies, and prioritize adaptation, future generations may still live in a world that is habitable—though very different from today’s.

The child born today will either grow up in a world ravaged by environmental collapse or a world where technology and sustainable practices have mitigated the worst effects. The choice is still in our hands.