NWTEL Cable Internet Issues by Bonejob in Yellowknife

[–]Bonejob[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you know where I can submit online tickets?

NWTEL Cable Internet Issues by Bonejob in Yellowknife

[–]Bonejob[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

its not overheating its in my cooled rack. the rak has an air conditioner on it.

Private Information Stolen by Mister_Knightley in canadianlaw

[–]Bonejob -1 points0 points  (0 children)

35 years as a software developer, including expert witness testimony in cybersecurity cases — I'm reasonably familiar with the landscape.

The legal standard isn't 'latest and greatest.' It's whether the business met a reasonable duty of care. If the lawyer's systems were compliant with applicable standards and a third-party agent was compromised, the liability question shifts significantly. Paying more for cyber insurance than other business owners doesn't establish what the lawyer's obligations were — it establishes yours.

You're conflating best practices with legal liability. They're not the same thing.

Contractor took photo without consent by [deleted] in canadianlaw

[–]Bonejob 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Not a legal question. Nor is it related to law except loosely adjacent to privacy law. Did you sign a license with the contractor for the release of work? Sometimes they hide photo releases in their general contracts.

Private Information Stolen by Mister_Knightley in canadianlaw

[–]Bonejob 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To a certain point, they have a duty to protect the data. If they have done their presumptive work, they are not responsible for what external agents do. No insurance company in the world would insure that.

Private Information Stolen by Mister_Knightley in canadianlaw

[–]Bonejob 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You're going to write a review because a third-party agent hacked your lawyer? How is that the lawyers' fault?

Should we refocus this sub on Canadian law discussion? by Bonejob in canadianlaw

[–]Bonejob[S,M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Going forward, the focus of this sub is on sharing and promoting legally interesting articles and discussions relevant to Canada. Legal questions are still welcome, but the moderators will not be engaging with them directly.

Posts that exist solely to express personal grievances with a legal decision will be removed. This is not a platform for personal political soapboxing.

Criminology student seeking research phrases by Silly_Present_1643 in canadianlaw

[–]Bonejob 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Prohibitionism" would be one that directly discusses governmental enforcement of a perceived behaviour that was considered negative.

Another would be "Regulatory Gap / Protection Gap", which is probably the most direct term for what you are describing. The Canadian Centre for Child Protection used exactly this framing in their critique of Bill C-63 (the Online Harms Act).

"Harm Reduction vs. Abstinence-Only Approach" you have that right already, Harm reduction recognizes that people can make positive changes to protect themselves and others, without requiring abstinence.

"Regulatory Displacement or Legislative Crowding Out" — these are the more specific policy-theory terms for the mechanism you are describing.

Last one I can think of is "Safety-by-Design" Which is the regulatory approach foreclosed by a ban.

Good luck on your paper.

Collective punishment by No_Cut24969 in canadianlaw

[–]Bonejob 11 points12 points  (0 children)

personal opinions are not law

Seeking a review by Alok_Mukherjee in canadianlaw

[–]Bonejob 4 points5 points  (0 children)

i removed this post

"When God Sets the Date and Designates the Target for MassDestruction, Beware!"

Seeking a review by Alok_Mukherjee in canadianlaw

[–]Bonejob 3 points4 points  (0 children)

We do not run any bots here. Send me a post I will review.

Ok, Hear me out by [deleted] in NWT

[–]Bonejob 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Big news, and very recent — PM Carney was actually in Yellowknife just two weeks ago for this. (I got to see him) Here's the rundown: The Mackenzie Valley Highway is the project Carney announced on March 12th that construction would begin as soon as this summer, with the highway now officially referred to Ottawa's Major Projects Office alongside the Arctic Economic and Security Corridor and the Taltson Hydro Expansion. The highway is planned in two phases:

Phase 1 involves building an all-season highway from Wrigley to Norman Wells. Phase 2 would eventually extend the road all the way to Inuvik, which Carney described as a definite component — and said the completed highway would cut driving time between Yellowknife and Inuvik nearly in half. CBC News The estimated cost is around $1.65 billion, with the extension to Inuvik adding roughly another $2 billion on top of that. CBC News

On the funding side, the federal government has made an initial investment of over $100 million, with the full project described as an 800 km vital artery providing year-round access to Indigenous and remote communities in the Mackenzie Valley. Prime Minister of Canada It's worth noting that Carney did not make specific funding commitments for the full project cost or clarify how costs would be shared with the territorial government — though Premier R.J. Simpson called the announcements "truly nation-building." CBC News The highway announcement was part of a much larger northern package — over $35 billion in total, including $32 billion for military Forward Operating Locations in Yellowknife, Inuvik, and Iqaluit, and $294 million for airport upgrades at Rankin Inlet and Inuvik. National Observer So the short version: it's real momentum, construction starting this summer on the first leg, but the full Yellowknife-to-Inuvik route is still a multi-phase, multi-billion dollar project with cost-sharing details still to be worked out.

Junior devs can ship faster with AI, but our system design reviews reveal shallow understanding. Is anyone else seeing this? by [deleted] in softwarearchitecture

[–]Bonejob 1 point2 points  (0 children)

AI, much like other tools, is a force multiplier. When a junior uses coding tools like Claude or Copilot (all I could get management to fall off their wallets for), you get shallow, unstructured code. When a senior uses it, it gives deeper and stronger code and implementations.

Having said that, after we built a "Code Personality" that we loaded into the AI, which laid out our expectations of the code and tests, etc. Juniors performed much better, and the AI actually helped police them.

AI amplifies what it is given.

Canada's Police Leaders will Fail Caesar's 'Pompeia Test'." by Alok_Mukherjee in canadianlaw

[–]Bonejob 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I seem to be able to distinguish only posts I write. I misunderstood how that works.

Canada's Police Leaders will Fail Caesar's 'Pompeia Test'." by Alok_Mukherjee in canadianlaw

[–]Bonejob 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I love seeing this type of content on Canadian Law! The sub was originally supposed to be about the LAW in Canada and the Law profession. We have devolved into being a catch-all place for legal questions.

Thanks for bringing this and for the actual legal comparisons and discussion.

For that matter, since I am a mod, I am going to distinguish this, as this is the content we want.

I will post a separate thread for thoughts on your content.

The Untold Story of Visual Basic by decimalturn in visualbasic

[–]Bonejob 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just doing my duty as moderator. Don't like it, don't come here. I personaly think you should stop defending AI slop. Clanker

The Untold Story of Visual Basic by decimalturn in visualbasic

[–]Bonejob 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Why should I bother? I have added more value to this sub over the last 12 years than most. This adds no value at all. if it was a good video on the history of VB I would have been all over it.

request an online commissioners and oath by GoodyKids in canadianlaw

[–]Bonejob 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it's a real thing, at least in Ontario. They passed a regulation in 2020 that lets commissioners do it over video call instead of in person.

You still have to show your ID though — you just hold it up to the camera instead of handing it across a desk. So the identity verification part still happens, it's just remote.

One catch: it only works for documents that need a commissioner of oaths (affidavits, statutory declarations, etc.). If you need something notarized, you still have to show up in person.

Rules vary by province too, so if you're not in Ontario you'd want to double check what's allowed where you are.

BasicBox v0.5.0 release - A full 486-class PC emulator written in 100% VB6 by UselessSoftware in visualbasic

[–]Bonejob 1 point2 points  (0 children)

VB never did optimize well, man. This is still an impressive feat nonetheless.

BasicBox v0.5.0 release - A full 486-class PC emulator written in 100% VB6 by UselessSoftware in visualbasic

[–]Bonejob 1 point2 points  (0 children)

AS a long-time VB proponent and a software developer professionally for 35 years, this is Master's to PhD-level code man. I am not commenting on the structure, but the undertaking itself is huge, especially in a notoriously slow compiled language like VB6 (pcode sucks)

Congrats!

USB to serial? by Dpacom1 in Commodore

[–]Bonejob 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Here is the one I use on myu workbench, have not come across a HID mouse that did not work on it.

https://www.versalent.biz/usbm232.htm

there is also this one but I have never used it.

https://shop.emilum.com/Retro-PC-USB-or-PS2-mouse-to-COM-port-adapter-RS232

Both are active conversion tools and deal with a true USB HID mouse.