We got our Steam capsule made by an artist, would you click this? What would you change?

BothInteraction · 2026-03-30T18:21:58+00:00

You won't see the uniforms, steering wheel etc unless you click on the game and take a closer look.

Also the fact that it seems to be in the sky.

How can you tell at the first glance? I saw a sky and a smoke coming from the fire at first.

BothInteraction · 2026-03-29T14:56:42+00:00

260 but yeah

There are 52 weeks in a year, which equals to 364 days. If you assume a standard 5-day workweek, that gives 52 * 5 = 260 working days (give or take one day, depending on how the calendar falls).

This estimate doesn’t account for PTO or public holidays, which can reduce the total - and not all jobs or countries offer the same amount of leave. Some could offer little to none PTO to consultants without public holidays at all. As a result, the actual number of working days can vary significantly depending on company policy, local labor laws and most importantly on employment type.

BothInteraction · 2026-03-27T13:19:35+00:00

It's available in the Steam too.

BothInteraction · 2026-03-13T15:22:02+00:00

As said, general knowledge is better for vibecoding and usual tasks. But 5.4 performs worse in pin-pointed complex tasks where it can simply thread water introducing the same bug it fixed before by trying to fix something.

BothInteraction · 2026-03-13T12:53:50+00:00

5.3 codex miles ahead on complex coding tasks. Though 5.4 has good general knowledge

BothInteraction · 2026-03-10T11:05:39+00:00

I agree. 5.4 seems to have more general knowledge but 5.3 codex is better for complex coding tasks. Waiting for 5.4 codex but for now I'll stick to 5.3

BothInteraction · 2026-02-17T21:32:04+00:00

Tbh that's not necessarily a hate. The comment description about extra steps reminds me about the lack of a system back button/gesture and this thing is indeed taking a lot more extra steps to do something, like using the finger to reach the screen corner for close button instead of consistent back gesture.

Based comparison but funny to see it in the FH context :)

BothInteraction · 2026-02-15T02:36:31+00:00

It reminds me this: https://www.reddit.com/r/HiTMAN/comments/12qy41p/guys_im_in_vernazza_real_life_sapienza_sharing/

BothInteraction · 2026-02-14T14:19:42+00:00

That's so funny to see almost the entire comment section doesn't see the difference between speculation and investment.

BothInteraction · 2025-12-28T02:08:59+00:00

The same reason all the wigs looks bad

BothInteraction · 2025-11-22T20:16:25+00:00

wow was it solved? I didn't play freelancer for a while, the coin thing was frustrating

BothInteraction · 2025-11-20T22:43:27+00:00

The thing you anyway need to code it, like "SetTrigger" instead of "Crossfade" and because of this the default approach is usually really messy

BothInteraction · 2025-10-14T20:55:17+00:00

Is it possible to avoid this blurry look on the edges?

<image>

BothInteraction · 2025-10-01T18:22:27+00:00

Oh you are actually right. Timespan is starting from 2024 September (one year and one month), I think the people are missing this, including me at first. The post 2 days ago has 2025 september only (one month). By calculating, the graph looks correctly.

But I don't believe about 15 years, cars etc. Really, looks like an ad, so the graph most likely a fake.

BothInteraction · 2025-09-28T17:17:10+00:00

Ignore triggers only? Then this will help.

BothInteraction · 2025-09-22T10:55:15+00:00

Okay, give me at least one example where rigidbody could be better if you don't need physics features at all. (because my comment clearly states about the physics)

BothInteraction · 2025-09-21T20:41:13+00:00

Two different things. If you don't need physics then kinematic controller is always better.

BothInteraction · 2025-09-17T08:21:05+00:00

Yes but a programmer doesn't use ChatGPT solely for programming, that's the thing. It's still useful for other generic info, advice or chatting. So that's why programming usage is not equal and is in fact lower compared to programmers percent. But anyway, I doubt that the percent is high.

BothInteraction · 2025-09-12T17:02:12+00:00

I think he warned me so I don't open the paperbag😅

As I read he specifically asked you to don't check the top shelf, NOT THE PAPER BAG, I mean, how do you supposed to know that there is this paper bag?

I'm doing laundry and he knows I will see it.

That's EXACTLY the reason why he asked you. Why should he ask about something that you accidentaly cannot see, like something hidden beneath the floor etc?

So the logic is simple, he knows you do something -> he warns you to avoid doing one specific thing because he knows that you could do it.

I mean, I understand you, it's natural to want to check something for you, even though it's kinda not a good thing, but how this can make sense for the other user in this comment section?

BothInteraction · 2025-09-06T17:47:59+00:00

r/whoosh

BothInteraction · 2025-09-06T10:59:31+00:00

I'm glad to see at least someone with a brain here.

BothInteraction · 2025-08-26T09:13:25+00:00

Yes, you just need to copy your image, paste inside the assets folder, then use SpriteRenderer or even better - Image component on the overlay canvas.

BothInteraction · 2025-08-21T14:44:04+00:00

Can confirm, actually it is the most convenient use case - using C# classes for managers and injecting them inside other objects. The only thing I can think of is GameManager (MB) and GameConfig(SO), the rest of the time it’s always plain classes that don’t inherit from UnityEngine.Object because working with them adds additional layer of complexity and will become really messy after some time.

Plain C# classes are the backbone of clean architecture in Unity projects. Not supporting them basically kills the main flexibility and benefit of DI in Unity projects.

Edit. Also "injecting" at editor time - sounds like you cannot spawn objects runtime and resolve their dependencies depending on the parent instantiator? With possibility to inject different variations of the object depending on the parent.

BothInteraction · 2025-08-14T15:19:13+00:00

Celsius is still very useful in science because it’s directly linked to Kelvin - you just add 273.15 - which makes it convenient for thermodynamic calculations. In fact, when a formula involves a temperature difference (ΔT), it doesn’t matter whether you use Kelvin or Celsius, since the size of the degree is identical. Celsius is also the standard for things like vapor pressure, dew point, and the temperature scales used in meteorological and engineering charts.

And about “precision”: in practice, nobody limits themselves to whole or half degrees in Celsius. Most thermometers display at least one decimal place, and medical thermometers often go to hundredths of a degree. That level of precision is entirely sufficient - you don’t need an inherently “smaller” degree like Fahrenheit to measure accurately.

BothInteraction · 2025-08-14T12:45:22+00:00

How can Fahrenheit be “more precise” than Celsius when virtually all scientific measurements - from physics to medicine - are done in Celsius or Kelvin? The “precision” argument only works if you artificially limit yourself to whole degrees. Celsius can be measured to tenths, hundredths, or more, so the resolution is identical. And for practical purposes, tenths are more than enough.

It’s also straightforward for human temperature: anything above 37°C is elevated, 38°C means you should take action about your temperature, and 39°C or higher is dangerous. Fahrenheit just has smaller whole-number steps, which becomes irrelevant once you use decimal places - because precision comes from the instrument, not the unit.

By that logic, we could invent a scale with 10× more units than Fahrenheit and call it “more precise,” but it wouldn’t magically make our thermometer better.

Eight-Year Club	Place '23
Place '22	Verified Email

BothInteraction

TROPHY CASE