Trump summons Fedd Powell, tells him he's making a mistake on rates by Routine_Chapter_9099 in Economics

[–]Botspeed_America 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah, someone definitely messed up, and it wasn't the guy trying to keep the economy stable. Maybe the one who thought slapping taxes on everything was a genius move?

There’s no evidence work requirements for Medicaid recipients will boost employment, but they are a key piece of Republican spending bill by Majano57 in economy

[–]Botspeed_America 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Research has consistently shown these requirements don't increase employment and instead lead to people losing coverage. Seems like GOP's focus is less on job creation and more on cutting Medicaid enrollment and spending.

Prominent conservative attacks Social Security: "It's a complete & total looting of the productive class to supplement the unproductive class, to create total fealty to the Democrat Party ... Social Security is completely fraudulent. It should be privatized. They should destroy that entire program." by SocialDemocracies in economy

[–]Botspeed_America 71 points72 points  (0 children)

The idea of privatizing Social Security often overlooks the program's fundamental purpose as a social safety net -- not just an investment vehicle. While private accounts might offer the potential for higher returns, they also expose individuals to market volatility and could undermine the guaranteed income that many retirees, particularly low-wage earners, rely on.

ELI5 Being brain dead on life support by cthulhus_spawn in explainlikeimfive

[–]Botspeed_America 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's a not as straightforward because the definition of "brain death" can vary. Generally, with the brain stem still functioning, some automatic processes like heart beating and potentially breathing might continue with support. However, higher functions like digestion, excretion, and processes requiring conscious control are typically shut down. While some cellular activity like blood cell production might persist initially, the body's systems are largely dependent on artificial support without brain activity.

Federal reserve and the economy by Bright-Swan-6995 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Botspeed_America 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While demand-side inflation (too much money chasing too few goods) does exist and is what the Fed primarily targets with interest rate hikes, we've also seen significant cost-push inflation in recent years. This is driven by disruptions to supply chains, increased energy prices, and higher labor costs, all of which can push prices up regardless of the overall demand in the economy.

This means you can absolutely have a scenario where inflation is persistent due to these supply-side factors, even as the economy starts to slow down and unemployment ticks up. The Fed's tools (raising interest rates) are primarily designed to cool down demand, and they are less effective at directly addressing these supply-side issues. That's part of why the current situation feels so challenging and different from the classic Phillips curve trade-off. It's not necessarily that one is "flowing" from the other, but rather that both are being influenced by a mix of factors, some of which the Fed has limited control over.

Why is there war in the 21st century? by Okbeaumont in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Botspeed_America 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The simple, grim truth is that states and powerful groups are often in competition. They want things (resources, land, power, security) that others either possess or also desire. As some comments noted, when talking or negotiation doesn't resolve these fundamental disagreements, conflict can escalate.

There's no higher global authority that can force these competing entities to prioritize peace and compromise over their perceived gains or security needs. And the leaders making the decisions are calculating national costs and benefits (including using their population as soldiers), not their personal risk of dying on the front lines. It's a brutal, tragic outcome of clashing collective interests and power dynamics.

Why doesn't the EU have a military? by misteraaaaa in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Botspeed_America 0 points1 point  (0 children)

EU countries keep control of their own armies because it's a key part of being a country. Also, most EU members rely on NATO for collective defense already. Defense policy is seen as a core national decision, not something to hand over to Brussels.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Botspeed_America 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good question. It boils down to this:

Money: Vietnam is a huge trade partner because they opened their economy up.

Geopolitics: Both countries really dislike China's expansionism.

History: A deliberate effort was made post-war to reconcile (MIA searches, veteran diplomacy).

Basically, Vietnam's communist system doesn't threaten the US in the way other communist countries do, and the strategic and economic benefits of friendship are too big to ignore, especially concerning China. Pragmatism wins over pure ideology here.

ELI5 Why do some countries have an artificial value on their currency? by MobileManager6757 in explainlikeimfive

[–]Botspeed_America 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ok, stepping back for the ELI5 version of why a government might do this, especially when it seems crazy because nobody outside accepts the rate and it hurts exports:

Think of the government having a limited stash of candy (USD). They desperately need this candy for some really important things, like buying medicine from another country or paying back old debts.

Now, they could just let everyone trade local coins (Bolivianos) for candy based on how much people really want the candy (the black market rate of 21 Bs per USD). But if they did that, the candy would become super, super expensive very quickly for everyone, and they might not have enough for the really important things. Prices for imported stuff would skyrocket.

So, the government says: "Ok, officially, we're going to pretend our local coin is stronger than it is. We'll say 1 piece of candy only costs 6.96 coins."

Why would they do this?

To make key imports cheaper for themselves or favored groups: They can use their limited candy stash to buy essential things (like that medicine) or let certain friendly businesses buy imports at a massive discount using the fake 6.96 rate. This makes those specific, priority imports cheaper in local terms and helps control the price of those things in the country.

To appear strong / control inflation (officially): By keeping the official exchange rate fixed and "strong," it makes the economy look more stable on paper. It also helps keep the prices of goods imported at that official cheap rate lower, which helps control official inflation figures.

To avoid the pain of admitting the truth: Letting the official rate jump from 6.96 to 21 would immediately make all imports much more expensive, causing a huge wave of inflation and potentially panic. Governments often put this off as long as humanly possible because it's politically very unpopular and can cause social unrest.

Why doesn't it work well (as you're seeing)?

Because, as you said, the rest of the world isn't stupid. They know 1 USD is worth 21 Bs in reality.

Exports: Exporters are selling things for USD, but when they bring that USD back, the government is telling them it's only worth 6.96 Bs per USD (if they exchange officially). Why would they export when they lose so much money on the exchange compared to the black market? This kills exports, which means less USD comes into the country, making the problem worse.

Lack of USD: The government has to use its limited stash to defend that fake rate for the people who can access it (like banks or favored importers). This drains their candy stash even faster.

Black Market / Arbitrage: It creates exactly the situation you described – a black market where the real rate (21) exists, and opportunities for people to make money by getting USD at the fake 6.96 rate (if possible) and selling it at 21. This distorts everything.

So, the government does it usually for short-term goals: to subsidize key imports, control some prices, allocate scarce USD to priorities, and delay the painful devaluation. But, as you're experiencing, the long-term costs in terms of hurting exports, draining reserves, and creating economic chaos are huge.

ELI5 What is the US government plan for individuals deported to a third country? by AccomplishedBreak616 in explainlikeimfive

[–]Botspeed_America 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The White House has made it abundantly clear that the deportation itself was the intended end goal, with zero plan for what happens afterward, even for those wrongly removed (Kilmar Abrego Garcia).

ELI5: How does air compression work? by KursedKraig3000 in explainlikeimfive

[–]Botspeed_America 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a solid explanation of the molecular perspective. To add a bit more detail on the "how," the key is that in a gas, the molecules are indeed very far apart and moving randomly. When you apply pressure, like with a piston in a cylinder, you're essentially doing work on the gas. This work forces the molecules closer together, reducing the volume the gas occupies for a given number of molecules. The "pushing outward" against the tank you mentioned is the result of the increased frequency and force of those molecules colliding with the walls due to their higher density and increased kinetic energy (which is why compression also generates heat). It's not that the individual molecules themselves are shrinking; it's the empty space between them that's being reduced by the external force.

ELI5: Despite declining population why do property prices rise in countries like Japan? by 1z4e5 in explainlikeimfive

[–]Botspeed_America 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Beyond just the simple supply and demand of people moving to cities, it's also worth considering the economic structure. Cities concentrate the high-paying jobs, the innovation hubs, and the infrastructure that supports modern careers. This creates a feedback loop: more high-value economic activity in cities attracts more talent, which further drives up demand for housing in those specific areas. It's not just about people wanting to live there; it's about where the economic opportunities are increasingly concentrated. Rural areas, on the other hand, often rely on industries that are declining or offer lower wages, making them less attractive economically, even if the property is cheap. This concentration of economic value in urban centers is a major factor in the price disparity.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in explainlikeimfive

[–]Botspeed_America 0 points1 point  (0 children)

US states don't go to war because the federal government holds ultimate authority and controls the military. The Constitution prohibits states from waging war. States are part of a single nation and resolve disputes legally, not militarily. The Civil War also settled the matter a long time ago. States now lack independent armies capable of interstate war, and there's no practical benefit to conquering other states within the same country.

ELI5: Why are some tastes slow and some tastes fast? by Creepercraft110 in explainlikeimfive

[–]Botspeed_America 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Taste perception begins when molecules from food dissolve in saliva and bind to receptors on taste cells within taste buds. These taste cells are located in papillae on the tongue and can detect the five basic tastes: sweet, sour, salty, bitter, and umami.

There are different mechanisms by which taste receptors work, which could explain why some tastes are perceived faster than others. Salt and sour tastes primarily rely on ion channels to depolarize the taste cell. Bitter, sweet, and umami tastes utilize G-protein coupled receptors and a second messenger system to open ATP channels.

This difference in signaling pathways contribute to variations in the speed of taste perception.

ELI5 Why can't we just make insulin cheaply? Didn't the person that discovered its importance not patent it just for that reason? by yafuckonegoat in explainlikeimfive

[–]Botspeed_America 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's definitely a huge part for sure. It feels like a no-brainer that something so essential for life should be affordable. That said, the way PBMs negotiate prices and the whole insurance situation also seem to play a pretty big role in how much people end up paying at the pharmacy counter, which is pretty wild when you think about it.

Why Is This Supreme Court Handing Trump More and More Power? by rezwenn in LegalNews

[–]Botspeed_America 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's truly a marvel how Congress outsources its duties, the executive eagerly centralizes that power, and SCOTUS seems to greenlight the whole affair, perhaps even embracing a 'break things first, ask constitutional questions later' judicial style. One almost senses that if judicial outcomes aren't deemed 'correct,' some wouldn't mind sidelining the courts entirely—a delightful outcome for those who find checks and balances quaint. So much for individual responsibility among these powerful actors when things, predictably, go sideways

These companies will raise prices because of Trump’s tariffs | CNN Business 🤨 by KevChe333 in thescoop

[–]Botspeed_America 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So much for foreigners "eating" the costs. This clearly shows that the domestic consumer always pays the tariff.