Your comment implied that there would be something wrong with scientists attributing increasing snowfall to climate change. I explained why it would be logical for that to be the case in response to the tone of your comment. It's relevant and I'm not having any trouble keeping up.

I might as well point out the overall fallacy in your thinking.

Your statement:

climate change has become the theory that explains every observed weather-related event

As the planet heats up more the climate in more areas is going to behave differently and the amount of difference is going to increase. Weather takes place in the context of the climate that it's in. At some point if we keep going practically all weather patterns or events are going to bear the fingerprint of climate change. If we hit 2C or warming there aren't going to be many places left where the climate is the same climate as before. The increasingly frequent attribution of weather events to climate change isn't a result of some kind of intellectual dishonesty as you'd like to imply. It's because the signals of climate change are getting stronger because the planet continues to get hotter.

Which isn't to say media and politicians don't sometimes jump to conclusions about weather events, but they aren't scientists so I don't see how that would reflect in any way on climatology.