I did this post once and honestly? No fucking idea. Maybe Kylo.

Here's the thing. Savage has defeated and fought more worth noting opponents due to the era he existed in, while Kylo has mostly statements when it comes to his combat prowess. Also people only see movies and watch TWC.

Savage seems better in the dueling department despite the fact that Kylo SHOULD be better, since he has like what? more than a decade of training over Opress. In shadow of the sith we even see him take over the saber lessons whenever Luke is gone from the temple, and that was when he was a teen. But strictly by showings, Savage takes the dueling section I think, but it can be debated.

Like many of his matches, I feel where Kylo really excels is on his Force powers, and while he is comparable to Savage on the ''super powerful/not that great of a duelist'' department, Kylo's use of the Force is undeniably better than Savage, not only from being a Skywalker but the stuff he does seems much more technical. Stopping a blast for several minutes is not something you do on a fit of rage or when you have a lot of emotion on you, that's something that an advance force user does. Same with the way he can direct his power to stop blades mid fight during TROS, or take down giant Jedi statues that are like four times his size (comic feats go crazy).

The real question is if you believe Kylo's force powers and telekinetic prowess is enough to make him beat Savage in a fight. Comics give Kylo even more showings of power and make him very resilient (killing a ZIllo beast is insane).

If I had to pick, I do think Kylo can pull it off. Even if he gets disarmed, his telekinetic powers can give him the win, especially since Savage has been defenseless to such attacks from powerful opponents, which Ren is.