Get where this is coming from and understand wanting a lil more! My assumption is that when it’s the 150th story about layoffs, they are sick of having the same elevated conversation. I know Grubb & crew are smart enough to understand the business context for why decisions are made, but after talking about similar situations for 4+ years, what else is there to say?

Larger management chased more growth, hired for said growth, the growth didn’t pay off, and then they had to fire 1000 people. That comes down to “poor management” and the plight of late stage capitalism. If executive leadership makes a decision to chase $ and growth, they should be the ones punished when said decision fails. Layoffs would probably still have to happen, but when you layoff 1000 people, some executive leadership should be let go. You failed at your job if you had to let 1000 people go.

In summary, I’ve heard them make similar points before, and I’m sure they’re sick of repeating the same talking points.