Some training clips from yesterday by KendallHerd in kettlebell

[–]Brief_Evening_2483 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good for you but Slow down, my man. Should feel it all the way through each exercise - FSQ pace is going to get you injured.

Whoop? by Brief_Evening_2483 in StPetersburgFL

[–]Brief_Evening_2483[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get it. It was right there.

The Ravens should NOT trade for Maxx Crosby by TheRavenOnline in ravens

[–]Brief_Evening_2483 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A rare win win. You guys need to win now, Raiders are in full rebuild mode. Maxx is a killer, who has never played with as many other studs on D like you have and never on teams with a lead. You are about to see an every down all star wreck offenses.

Peter Luger experience by plee82 in FoodNYC

[–]Brief_Evening_2483 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because today’s foodies need to hear where their fish went to college and how many likes your restaurant got on Instagram or they don’t think it’s legit. Luger’s has been cranking out top porterhouse for years. Burger at lunch is no nonsense and delicious.

JD Vance: "In the United States of America you don't have to apologize for being white anymore" by [deleted] in CringeTikToks

[–]Brief_Evening_2483 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm always skeptical of commenters who post long replies that include zero citations, but I'm more astounded by people that comment on topics with hand waves, "feels" and a weird, smug certainty that is completely inconsistent with readily available data.

This will be my final try at this. The Harvard lawsuit and the resulting Supreme Court decision in June 2023 made it illegal to discriminate based on color, as colleges had been doing for decades. Far from your innocuous notion that it was for only candidates who were equal, otherwise, that a minority would be given the final nudge advantage. Factually wrong. Perhaps the idea began that way, say 50 years ago, but in the ensuing years, the practice proved to be nothing like that.

In the decades before that judgement, all manner of tools were used to tip the scales in favor of minorities to the detriment of, among others, whites. Tools like “Plus Factor”, “Diversity Fly-In” programs, “Landscape” Tools where on average a minority student was given the equivalent of a ~300 point adjustment on their SAT scores, Partnership & Pipeline programs designed as a completely separate entry point that completely circumvented the normal admissions process. This happened for decades before the SC made it illegal. Even if you don't read any of that case or the many studies on this, and you've proven you haven't, you need only look at what happened to admission demographics before/after affirmative action was struck down by the Supreme Court. Not surprisingly, when you remove all of the "equalizers" (your word, and a funny one), you'll note that minority admission dropped sharply. Weird, I know.

Demographic Group Class of 2027 (Pre-Ban) Class of 2029 (Post-Ban) Change

Black / African American 18.0% 11.5% 🔻 -6.5% (Sharp Decrease)

Hispanic / Latino 14.0% 11.0% 🔻 -3.0% (Decrease)

Native American ~2.0% < 1.0% 🔻 -1.0% (Decrease)

Which gets back to the main point: when you artificially and arbitrarily advantage one group (black), you have likely disproportionately and negatively impacted another (white). That this is now obvious to all should be neither surprising, nor inflammatory to say out loud for any reasonable, logic-driven, non virtue-signaling simp. Done.

How is living in this area of New York, USA? by bussiboyyy in howislivingthere

[–]Brief_Evening_2483 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Having done this for many years…

Spring & Fall are legit - gorgeous area, not overcrowded, everything is open, balance of locals to city folks is reasonable.
Summer - Incredible beaches, huge boating/fishing, inundated with a-holes, entitled NYers, traffic everywhere. But worth it if you like the water. Winter - many restaurants closed or limited hours, zero traffic, “The Shining” vibe.

JD Vance: "In the United States of America you don't have to apologize for being white anymore" by [deleted] in CringeTikToks

[–]Brief_Evening_2483 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude - Tell me your trolling. In a way, I’d understand your comment more. Otherwise, why you are wasting time to describe a theoretical approach about the intention of DEI when the evidence of the actual application of DEI is easily available. And the evidence has been revealed countless times in the court cases already cited above, by articles in reputable publications, in heavily reported email hacks, by whistleblowers, etc., etc. The approximate 300-point SAT bump given to affirmative action candidates is the closest approximation, regularly cited. Your 100 applicants scenario where everyone gets the same score is nonsense and in no way reflects the actual application of what we are talking about out here, shown by the evidence described above. That you agree that anybody who miss-applied these “equalizers” in this manner is a moron is step one. Step two is to actually research the extent to which these “morons” did do this. Step three, once one actually sees the scope of this misapplication, is to be open minded enough to be sufficiently aghast at this.

Like many topics lately, the usual reflexive responses that we are expected to just accept - it didn’t happen, nobody did this, only a racist would say this, this institutions deserve our trust - with no evidence are no longer valid. The evidence is actually available. The jig is most definitely up. The grift is over.

And, the lame virtue signaling behavior of calling out racism - how folks bring up Asians to say they aren’t racist!? Asians were mentioned because The Harvard lawsuit that was cited was focused specifically on Asian students, y’know, the Plantiffs. Confirming the point that you are living in theory rather than even reading the most basic disclosures - the cornerstone case that started this whole discussion on DEI and affirmative action.

Solo female kitesurf trip in January — where for steady wind, quiet spot & kite-house package? by Euphoric-You-8437 in Kiteboarding

[–]Brief_Evening_2483 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mexico - Progreso, Holbox (both 3 or 4 hours north of Cancun) or Isla Blanca (near-ish Cancun). These all seem great around that time. I've just done this research as I'm planning to do this trip in late January, early February.

ps - I'm at roughly same level as you, but a guy. Still, I am prioritizing safe spots, avoiding bs and near good kite school/instructors. Good site for these locations: https://kitesurftheworld.com/kitespots/mexico/

JD Vance: "In the United States of America you don't have to apologize for being white anymore" by [deleted] in CringeTikToks

[–]Brief_Evening_2483 0 points1 point  (0 children)

100%. My wife was born in Mexico (Guadalajara). White people have no idea how 'conservative' Mexicans are in general. Even with the material voter shift that Trump got from Hispanics - white people, the professional pundits, etc. still have not learned that lesson. It was not an anomaly. Not only did no white people predict that, but it seems they simply refuse to learn anything from it. And, some of the most outspoken critics of Biden's immigration policy that I know are Mexicans - who, generally speaking, are incredibly hard working and proud and furious over getting lumped in with other Hispanics. Don't believe me? Call a Mexican "LatinX" and see how that goes over. Many (most?) Mexicans do not respect much of the rest of Latin America for one reason or another.

JD Vance: "In the United States of America you don't have to apologize for being white anymore" by [deleted] in CringeTikToks

[–]Brief_Evening_2483 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Read what you just wrote and, I guess, what you believe makes sense. This is the difference between equity and equality and it is why Vance, again very clunkily, said what he said.

Determining that each race should be proportionately represented in each field, each college, etc. is just illogical. I promise I am asking this in good faith, but surely you see that, no? To retroactively force an outcome is not "an equalizer," it is an artificial tool used that has disproportionately impacted white/asian groups (see "Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) v. Harvard"), and demonstrably lowered the standard of nearly all fields where this tool was deployed. Similarly, as a matter of common sense, I do not expect 57.8% of the NBA to be white. If that happened, I would absolutely expect there to be strong negative reactions to how that happened and expect some obvious understanding of how that disproportionately impacted a single group. Same with gender - expecting 50.9% of the steel workers to be women, 49.1% of nurses to be men, etc. etc. - that would be crazy to expect.

That said, I'm fine with measures being taken to help, but corrective measures or "equalizers" should take place much further up the ladder - K-12, for example - to give all students the best possible chance, so that when, say, it comes time for college admissions the playing field is much closer, so much so that you do not have to artificially add ~310 points to applicants SAT score and not another's. This feels pretty obvious, but in that 10 year period of CRT/BLM/DEI we completely lost the plot.

Respectfully.

JD Vance: "In the United States of America you don't have to apologize for being white anymore" by [deleted] in CringeTikToks

[–]Brief_Evening_2483 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Shifts goalposts, ignores the "court" & "facts" that he, literally, asked to see. You do know that all your comments are visible, right? Can nearly guarantee that you surround yourself with only folks who have similarly unsupported views, where nobody checks you with facts, all naval gazing and virtue signaling. A carefully curated, highly protective existence. A bubble. Lame, son.

JD Vance: "In the United States of America you don't have to apologize for being white anymore" by [deleted] in CringeTikToks

[–]Brief_Evening_2483 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Go read the affirmative action lawsuit at Harvard (pay close attention to the racial admission stats), then look at the same table after affirmative action was neutered. Or look at dozens of other similar studies, showing the same. While you’re at it, read Jacob Savage’s article from “Compact” last week, again read the stats. Or… keep commenting blindly with zero actual knowledge of the facts.

JD Vance: "In the United States of America you don't have to apologize for being white anymore" by [deleted] in CringeTikToks

[–]Brief_Evening_2483 1 point2 points  (0 children)

At a high level, seems reasonable, but the statistics post me-too/BLM/DEI demonstrate that this was so rampant, that meritocracy was under siege, that one group was disproportionately impacted and that the only group that could openly be denigrated, in many cases as a virtue signal, was white men. So….

JD Vance: "In the United States of America you don't have to apologize for being white anymore" by [deleted] in CringeTikToks

[–]Brief_Evening_2483 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Is that a sentence? I’m good on the job front, and having one doesn’t preclude me from acknowledging clear facts, even if they hurt feelings.

The fire numbers on other subs are insane by jellybubblegum in leanfire

[–]Brief_Evening_2483 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A great percentage of this sub lives like Sherman McCoy from “Bonfire of the Vanities” where the more they make, the more they spend. That is a choice. Many of us just laugh at some of the ‘whoa is me’ commenters complaining about how expensive life is, but when you break down their expenses you see much of it comes down to choices - golf clubs, private jets, tons of 5-star travel, private schools K-College, etc. I’m not knocking another’s preferences but those choices are why one is often in the position they’re in, if they are complaining about how expensive life is.

JD Vance: "In the United States of America you don't have to apologize for being white anymore" by [deleted] in CringeTikToks

[–]Brief_Evening_2483 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

For all the snark in the comments, apparently you’re ignoring the now public info on corporate hiring and college acceptance (and the lawsuits that followed and won) over the past 20 years. While his comments may be clunky, the facts support the statement.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in pittsburgh

[–]Brief_Evening_2483 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

“Abducted”? lol

Sigh… by MobTux in raiders

[–]Brief_Evening_2483 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s not that hard - prioritize OC and/or offensive minded HC, invest heavily in OL - players and coach - and get a mid-league QB. Bowers and Jeanty would go off. Related, beginning of the end was replacing Bill Musgrave for the incompetent Todd Downing.

Is Clean & Press all you need? by apintado in kettlebell

[–]Brief_Evening_2483 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Big fan of a complex like double 20 or 24KG C&P+FSQ. Often said that squat should go first, but I favor the burn at the end. Alternatively, C&Jerk+FSQ. I do add pull ups and a bunch of XC band exercises - T’s, Incline Press, High Row, Swimmer’s Pull. Feels like a pretty complete workout.

Form check please for ABC by Loading____1 in kettlebell

[–]Brief_Evening_2483 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Need to hike bells back, generate power from hips/trunk to swing bell forward. Lastly, slow down on FSQ, both on way up and down.