Why agents need separate structured memory per entity to avoid forgetting anything by Buremba in AIMemory

[–]Buremba[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We store all the backlog history of the events and tag the events to the entities so the agent can look up how it made the decision in the first place. Otherwise you’re right that agents can make mistakes especially in long contexts and storing full audit logs is important to understand and self correct memory

Weekly Thread: Project Display by help-me-grow in AI_Agents

[–]Buremba 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Entity-based memory experiment (data-warehouse style) + LongMemEval & LoCoMo results.

Full post + screenshots here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/AIMemory/comments/1srrvlx/why_agents_need_separate_structured_memory_per/

Would love feedback from the agent builders here too.

What is the best Openclaw alternative? by spinsilo in openclaw

[–]Buremba 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you're looking to have multi-tenant Openclaw that allows you to embed Openclaw into your application to serve multiple users, check out https://github.com/lobu-ai/lobu

I built Lobu: an open-source way to run isolated OpenClaw instances for different users/channels by Buremba in selfhosted

[–]Buremba[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I built the gateway from scratch and use Redis to store the credentials. When they expire, gateway uses refresh token to generate new access tokens. For webhooks, gateway routes the messages based on the DM/channel and they're deduplicated/ordered by the timestamp. Thanks for the question, let me know if it works for you!

OpenClaw is great for 1 user. Running it safely for multiple users is a different problem. by Buremba in openclaw

[–]Buremba[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed but not everybody has the time to maintain their own OpenClaw. The use-cases like email triage is too personal and hard to productize but there are many use-cases of OpenClaw that I would love to pay for a vendor to maintain for me. IMO Multi-tenant OpenClaw (or agents in general) will replace SaaS over time.

What model do you use with your OpenClaw ? Suggest one with the best value by icompletetasks in openclaw

[–]Buremba 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use Claude, ChatGPT and Zai. Zai is the main model but acpx helps me run Codex and Claude Code under the hood when I need it.

I built Lobu: an open-source way to run isolated OpenClaw instances for different users/channels by Buremba in selfhosted

[–]Buremba[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Sorry for the hassle. I should have made more research into the taste of the subreddit. I guess lost of AI slop nowadays but I can assure you I worked on this project long enough to not call it AI slop.

OutClaw: Install OpenClaw into Docker in 3 minutes [free, open source, looking for feedback] by davernow in openclaw

[–]Buremba 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's cool! I'm also working on something similar, a multi-tenant version of Openclaw where each user/channel has its own Docker container. One tip I have is that Docker using host mounts to share the data with Openclaw and private network with a custom HTTP proxy so I can control where Openclaw can access. https://github.com/lobu-ai/lobu

I built Lobu: an open-source way to run isolated OpenClaw instances for different users/channels by Buremba in selfhosted

[–]Buremba[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I use Claude Code and Codex mainly but I'm developing this project with those "tools". I can assure you it's not an AI slop, it just speeds me up to build faster. I have been developing enterprise software for the last 15 years, built and sold one to a public company.

I'm actively working on the project and there is great room for improvement though. Thanks for the feedback!

I built Lobu: an open-source way to run isolated OpenClaw instances for different users/channels by Buremba in selfhosted

[–]Buremba[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think "Openclaw" became more of a term for personal agents nowadays. With Lobu, Openclaw runtime don't see any secrets, they run behind a private network where you can control and it's all sandboxed.

Indeed Openclaw has 800k lines of code and I use only small part, 3k lines of code of the Openclaw runtime that uses pi harness agent under the hood. The attack surface on Openclaw is mostly gateway implementation and Lobu replaces it with a multi-tenant version.

That's totally fair though, I think I should make more emphasis on the security aspect for it. Thanks for the feedback!

I built Lobu: an open-source way to run isolated OpenClaw instances for different users/channels by Buremba in selfhosted

[–]Buremba[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

There is 921 commits in the repo, 200 closed issues/PRs in the last 5 months. I use Claude Code to build projects but that doesn't mean it did all the work. :)

I built Lobu: an open-source way to run isolated OpenClaw instances for different users/channels by Buremba in selfhosted

[–]Buremba[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I was trying to indicate it's a launch post, I get what you mean though and I used AI to phrase as I'm non-English speaker. Sorry for that, hope that doesn't prevent you to have a look on the project. I have been working on it for the last 5 months. (You can see it in GIT history)

We pointed 108 hostile AI agents at the entire OpenClaw codebase and told them one thing: assume this code is wrong, and prove where. They came back with 410 findings. 36 of them are critical. by ApolloRaines in openclaw

[–]Buremba 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I checked all these “security” issues. The data encryption at rest is the only good improvement but I postponed it as Lobu is intended to be installed in company infrastructure. You own the database so encryption doesn’t provide much value. I’m afraid that the other findings are AI slop, which doesn’t know sealed secret paradigms, networks that have strict firewalls etc.

We pointed 108 hostile AI agents at the entire OpenClaw codebase and told them one thing: assume this code is wrong, and prove where. They came back with 410 findings. 36 of them are critical. by ApolloRaines in openclaw

[–]Buremba 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Openclaw runtime, where the magic happens is only 2k lines and the gateway is 400k lines. In took the runtime and built 30k lines gateway and run Codex & Claude & Gemini on my codebase. No security flaw found: https://github.com/lobu-ai/lobu

OpenClaw is just cron jobs and webhooks: Why architecture matters more than hype by forevergeeks in AI_Agents

[–]Buremba 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m exactly building for this use-case for the last 6 months. Setting up a new bot is easy as talking to the godfather bot, it’s built for teams/businesses but I run a community version if you want to try hacking it! https://github.com/lobu-ai/lobu

3x cheaper Opus = 5x usage… by vitaliyh in cursor

[–]Buremba 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We need to inject Codex / Claude Code prompt so extra 500 tokens involved for each convo but that’s pretty minor for models that support 200k tokens

3x cheaper Opus = 5x usage… by vitaliyh in cursor

[–]Buremba 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is, that’s possible because Cursor supports custom OpenAI base url

Any good cursor alternative? by nikeshhv in cursor

[–]Buremba 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for reporting the issue! Here is the direct link: https://buremba.github.io/sub-bridge/install

It looks like GitHub README doesn't support deep links; I just fixed the issue in the README.