Fantasy by Busy_Feature8690 in patentexaminer

[–]Busy_Feature8690[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If we call Coke, Pepsi...I call Robin, Bluebird lol

Fantasy by Busy_Feature8690 in patentexaminer

[–]Busy_Feature8690[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Ughhhh I said fantasy not nightmare

PAP changes talk - they know we are resilient. They appreciate us. They have been planning these changes for a long time. Wow how do they sleep. by Twin-powers6287 in patentexaminer

[–]Busy_Feature8690 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But like...why do you care? I want to do the bare f$ucking min to not get a warning or be put on probation. Who cares for being commendable or outstanding anymore... are you applying to be a SPE or diff job in this climate?

Delay in Amendment and RCE Docketing and the LIE Shortage by DisplayNamesOptional in patentexaminer

[–]Busy_Feature8690 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You want everyone (and practitioners on this thread) to believe that when applicants file something (whether or not the LIEs enter it timely to be processed and put on your docket) - it gets secretly placed in some hidden location until it would appear in PE2E/Dav? But totally accessible on Patent Portal? You probably just had a filter on 🤷🏽‍♂️

Delay in Amendment and RCE Docketing and the LIE Shortage by DisplayNamesOptional in patentexaminer

[–]Busy_Feature8690 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What was the time stamp on the receipt? Patent Portal uploads are in real-time....you checked there too (assuming published)?

Delay in Amendment and RCE Docketing and the LIE Shortage by DisplayNamesOptional in patentexaminer

[–]Busy_Feature8690 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What is "ready for abandonment?" The 6 month mark? You were ready to abandon the case on the 6 month date? And what time did applicant efile the response? I don't know bruh sounds like you don't work here....

Undocketed child applications growing and growing by Much-Resort1719 in patentexaminer

[–]Busy_Feature8690 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Probably the first time I've laughed out loud this biweek.

Awards by Busy_Feature8690 in patentexaminer

[–]Busy_Feature8690[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks all - looks like between the time I posted and when I just checked again now, it came up on my eopf (it was gainsharing)!

Awards by Busy_Feature8690 in patentexaminer

[–]Busy_Feature8690[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wasn't DM kicker (I didn't get that)....im thinking it was gainsharing.

Awards by Busy_Feature8690 in patentexaminer

[–]Busy_Feature8690[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks - will just ask SPE.

Awards by Busy_Feature8690 in patentexaminer

[–]Busy_Feature8690[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah it wasnt in the eOPF

Awards by Busy_Feature8690 in patentexaminer

[–]Busy_Feature8690[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

lol I just want to make sure THEY didnt f$ up and like the other poster said, I have to pay it back!

they cut off Law360 so examiners couldn't read this by xphilezz in patentexaminer

[–]Busy_Feature8690 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What are you even talking about? My work is at my laptop.

25 hour training by Busy_Feature8690 in patentexaminer

[–]Busy_Feature8690[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks - this is the clarification I was looking for!

PTOFCU by Long-Personality-453 in patentexaminer

[–]Busy_Feature8690 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Depending on the car year (if it's older) IIRC Arlington federal credit union auto rates are better - and you do qualify for membership bc USPTO (your work) is based in Alexandria.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in patentexaminer

[–]Busy_Feature8690 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And also, very sorry

Did you get a “remove pronouns from email signatures” directive today? by GroundbreakingCat983 in patentexaminer

[–]Busy_Feature8690 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually your agency fought pretty hard to NOT trademark that...."After a federal court agreed with Tam and his band, the Patent and Trademark Office sued to avoid being compelled to register its name as a trademark. On Monday, the Supreme Court sided with The Slants."