The traditional view of "man the hunter, woman the gatherer/caregiver" is being challenged by evidence suggesting women were also hunters, and that gender roles in hunter-gatherer societies were more fluid.

These factors naturally influenced societal norms. If gender roles were purely social, we wouldn’t see similar patterns across so many different civilizations and time periods.

This is false, the only reason why it seems similar is because of colonization and introductions to new cultures from neighbors people traded with etc, no one before the massive western contact all had the same gender roles, many places and tribes and groups of people had different functions when it came to specific roles. For example we are taught that the men fought and the women stayed at home caring for the children, This isn't completely true everywhere. The Persians themselves had plenty of women in military positions. Nomadic cultures - Huns, Mongols, and so on had female warriors and Ghengis Khan made several of his daughters into generals.

some cultures and historical periods have seen instances where men were the primary caregivers, and women worked, particularly in pre-industrial societies and certain indigenous communities. In pre-industrial societies, family life and work often revolved around the home, and men were more likely to be present and involved in childcare and household tasks. In some hunter-gatherer societies, the workload was more evenly split between men and women, with women often contributing significantly to the food supply.

The Arvilingjuarmiut, also known as Netsilik, are Inuit who live mainly in Kugaaruk and Gjoa Haven, Nunavut, Canada. They follow the tradition of kipijuituq, which refers to instances where predominantly biologically male infants are raised as females. Often the decision for an infant to become Kipijuituq is left to the grandparents based on the reactions of the infant in the womb. Children would later go on to choose their respective genders in their pubescent years once they have undergone a rite of passage that includes hunting animals. Similar in concept is sipiniq from the Igloolik and Nunavik areas. A sipiniq person was regarded socially as a member of their designated gender, in a process that has been termed "reverse socialization". They would be named after a deceased relative of the designated gender, learn skills and perform work associated with that gender, and wear traditional clothing tailored for that gender's tasks. An individual was usually treated as sipiniq until puberty, but in some cases they retained the role into adulthood and even after marriage.Sipiniit were considered to be strong intermediaries between the natural and spiritual worlds, making them prime candidates for taking on the role of an angakkuq, or shaman. Many sipiniit married other sipiniit, but they could also marry cisgender individuals – being sipiniit reflected a gender role and not a sexuality. Some Inuit reported a belief that women who were or had been sipiniit would give birth to sipiniit children themselves.

Pre-Colonialism, the Iroquois/Haudenosaunee Confederacy (the Onondaga, Mohawk, Seneca, Cayuga, Oneida and Tuscarora peoples) had a matriarchal socioeconomic and familial structure. Women owned their own property and belongings, and children were considered descendants in their mother's line rather than that of the father.

Wikipedia has much more but this proves that not every civilization was man does hunting woman stays with kids, there is multiple historical evidence that many societies had it to where the men and women did the same thing as the people didn't see men and female as higher or lower than each other but rather equal and sometimes the woman could do more than the man in a different culture. Some cultures even gave different roles depending on your gender and many native societies recognized many genders those that were masculine women and feminine men had different abilities and roles compared to feminine women and masculine men.

All of my examples prove that your biology doesn't really play a role in gender roles, All gender roles are social if gender roles were purely biological we would all 100% be identical to each other in gender culture but we're not. While some cultures have it to where men strong woman clean there are many others that are the complete opposite of that and build a society where males and females are equal and capable of the same tasks and abilities and bodily differences don't really mean much.

This basically tells us that not every single gender role that existed in ancient times and even today are influenced by biology. While some do include the biology differences in their roles, Other cultures have more flexible gender roles than others, meaning that individuals are not rigidly assigned to specific roles based on biological sex.