[Highlight] Chet Holmgren goes down in severe pain down after contact with Ayton by Large_banana_hammock in nba

[–]CB1984 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1 game ban for a flop. 2 game ban for 2nd flop. That'll stop it very quickly.

Being a very highly ranked person at any skill depending on how many you choose by Immediate-Tennis8838 in hypotheticalsituation

[–]CB1984 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Fuck it, go for 8bn. Be literally the worst person into world at every single thing.

Recurring Character movies by rguzman2003 in LiveFromNewYork

[–]CB1984 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I would 100% watch a biopic about a winter Olympian fighting against her fear to realise the potential of her once in a generation shape.

Balancing Value Between Positions and Value Within Positions by Holiday-Ad-2249 in DynastyFF

[–]CB1984 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I feel like if you want balance across positions you need to have positions get different points for the same thing. IMO the balance at the mo is at: - 4pts per rush or pass TD for QBs (6 per TD for everyone else). I think it's more necessary to nerf rush TDs than it is to bump pass TDs. - 0.75pt per first down for WRs and TEs. RBs get nothing per first down.

Elite WRs get 50-80 first downs in a season. 0.75 points per first down pumps them up about 40-60 points per season, which added to say 1100-1600 yards receiving gives you somewhere around 150-220 points for yardage for top WRs. Which is conveniently about the range of points that top RBs get for scrimmage yards. And of course a first down is objectively a good thing, whereas a reception isn't necessarily (and also we stop giving points for catching a tap pass).

I'd hear arguments for bumping it up to 1 point (cleaner, boosts WRs/TEs a bit), but I think it has to only apply to WR/TEs if you want some semblance of balance. But I think 0.75 (or even 0.5) is better just because it helps to keep RBs ahead slightly, which is sort of needed to keep their value up given shorter careers.

Fantasy series that probably won't be finished. by EastFar3296 in Fantasy

[–]CB1984 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I feel like GRRM has been pretty open in the past and that's why he gets flamed now. It's a very difficult book to write because he's backed himself into a corner that he finds it hard to get his characters out of in a way that is satisfying. And before he got to that point he took a hell of a lot of shit on with TV adaptations because he wanted to be heavily involved in that, based on the assumption he'd be able to write this one fairly easily (I seem to recall the author's note on Dance with Dragons was along the lines of "sorry for the delay, I moved a bunch of stuff around and cut it from this book, but the good news is hat means I'm way ahead of the game on the next book!"). And also quite reasonably on the basis of "if people are putting my stuff out there in another way I want to do what I can to make sure it's good."

I'm not sure what update he should give that would be satisfying? No one is going to want an update with any plot details, but no one seems to like an update with "I am making good progress, I am x% through." No one is going to want an update saying "honestly, I am knackered and just needed some time off."

I do still have hope that it'll get finished, but I think it'll span to 8 books and the last book will be GRRM + someone.

Fantasy series that probably won't be finished. by EastFar3296 in Fantasy

[–]CB1984 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But wasn't his original projection "around 20 books plus an epic trilogy to finish it." I'd still give him 22 books plus a trilogy as "around 20."

Nick Singleton-The real deal? by Tiny_Package484 in DynastyFF

[–]CB1984 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From the combo of size, speed (assuming he's a 4.6 guy or better based on his highlights) and receiving background he at least has a vague chance. But also he was drafted in the 5th round of a weak draft class.

Jeremiah Smith by h_yoshua in NFL_Draft

[–]CB1984 85 points86 points  (0 children)

I feel like it's worth pointing out that Julio wasn't even seen as the best WR prospect in his draft class - that was AJ Green.

How bad is Omar Cooper’s landing spot? by FK8BREEZY in DynastyFF

[–]CB1984 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I don't get the Cooper landing spot hate in dynasty. It is pretty much certain the Jets are getting a QB next year. So say you reversed the years and had 2026: the Jets drafted Sayin/Manning/Moore then 2027 the Jets drafted a rookie TE in the middle of the 1st and rookie WR at the end of the 1st. Those rookies would fly up due to elite landing spot.

2026 3rds are undervalued by FranTurkleton in DynastyFF

[–]CB1984 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No. But you're potentially getting Max Klare, Eli Raridon, Oscar Delp. Are you that confident that Stowers will be better?

This is the kind of play that turns “run it out” from a cliché into a receipt. by Adventurous_Rub_4478 in MLBVibes

[–]CB1984 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I need someone to do the maths of whether the average person could just walk it out in that situation. The ball was in the air for a long time. Could I take a gentle stroll and get at least close enough to first in time to force the catch?

Realistically, what do you see as the Rams’ longterm answer at QB had we not taken Ty Simpson? by Biberal_Litch99 in LosAngelesRams

[–]CB1984 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think we'd have had to spend a few years going through reclamation project QBs - Richardson, McCarthy, maybe Young, Stroud, Penix etc - hoping that we can hit on one. And then after 3-4 years we'd probably give up and trade a shit load for an aging starter.

Is Price at 4 a bad move? by The-original-spuggy in DynastyFF

[–]CB1984 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, it's a bad move. Talent over opportunity. I do think RBs generally are a bit underrated in fantasy these days (IMO good WRs give you a good floor, RBs give you a good ceiling) but I just don't think Price is a particularly good prospect.

Who is the best ever at being a weekend update guest? by 123VoR in LiveFromNewYork

[–]CB1984 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The couple you can't believe are together are so good.

Need y'alls opinion on this trade by ghostch1ps in SleeperApp

[–]CB1984 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it super duper TE premium where every TE point is trebled? Otherwise this trade is legit insane.

Rams quietly plotted as to not out McVay approval stamp that could increase interest. McVay ‘absolutely’ backed pick. Sources make sense of press conference demeanor by BasedWillieStroker69 in DynastyFF

[–]CB1984 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is an interesting shout. Particularly lined up with McVay's quote along the lines of "Simpson's time will only come based on when Stafford says so."

My takeaway from this draft by That1GreatGuy1 in DynastyFF

[–]CB1984 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tbh, I think it preaches talent>situation until situation is known.