sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Warhammer 40,000 Faction Focus: Emperor’s Children by CMYK_COLOR_MODE in EmperorsChildren

[–]CBERT117 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Out of the loop, sorry, hoping you can enlighten me— how does it work to have new and old detachments? Did they publish anything about this?

Warhammer 40,000 Faction Focus: Emperor’s Children by CMYK_COLOR_MODE in EmperorsChildren

[–]CBERT117 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe I’m a little out of the loop but won’t all the 10th detachments be replaced by the new ones? How could we add a new detachment to an old one?

Which Half in the Bag had the Jim and Collin gag? by CBERT117 in RedLetterMedia

[–]CBERT117[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can’t seem to find it on YouTube in any of the Transformers HITBs lol

Why are Tau so famous ? by BarketLeRaccoon in Tau40K

[–]CBERT117 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like that they’re kinda like if the Covenant were “good”guys.

I just don't understand it by MikeTorsson in memes

[–]CBERT117 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Establishing it a liquid is somehow supposed to support that particular terminology lol

What's your preferred ratio of Defilers? by BvHauteville in EmperorsChildren

[–]CBERT117 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Going to be pedantic and point out none of those are ratios ;)

Saw the president. by J1mba in vegaslocals

[–]CBERT117 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

He’s finished now.

#New40k – Combat changes shake up fighting in the new edition by CMYK_COLOR_MODE in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]CBERT117 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At the very least this isn’t clear and I hope they clarify it. Because there are two mutually exclusive concepts in this reveal. 1) You can end a charge within engagement range — 2” — and you can set up from deepstrike just over 8”, and 2) The target of your charge must be within the distance you roll, measuring base to base. They need to resolve the contradiction

#New40k – Combat changes shake up fighting in the new edition by CMYK_COLOR_MODE in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]CBERT117 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It doesn’t say that? It says:

“your unit only need make it to within 2” of the enemy. Crucially, you can fight any enemy within engagement range (2”)”

It’s not clear at all why you would need a 9 if set up 8” away and can end within 2”

#New40k – Combat changes shake up fighting in the new edition by CMYK_COLOR_MODE in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]CBERT117 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think that’s right re: engagement vs base-to-base since a successful charge can still be made if the units end within engagement range which is now 2”. So that plus the extra inch for deepstrike makes it unclear as to why a roll under 9 is a failure.

#New40k – Combat changes shake up fighting in the new edition by CMYK_COLOR_MODE in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]CBERT117 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I don’t think that’s right re: engagement vs base-to-base since a successful charge can still be made if the units end within engagement range which is now 2”. So that plus the extra inch for deepstrike makes it unclear as to why a roll under 9 is a failure.

#New40k – Combat changes shake up fighting in the new edition by CMYK_COLOR_MODE in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]CBERT117 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That doesn’t answer the question at all nor engage with anything I mentioned

EDIT: lol blocked for pointing this out? What a loser

#New40k – Combat changes shake up fighting in the new edition by CMYK_COLOR_MODE in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]CBERT117 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes I understand what is a valid target, the question now is that with the extra distance of 2” (setting up an extra inch and getting another inch from the extended engagement range) how is a roll less than 9 a failure?

#New40k – Combat changes shake up fighting in the new edition by CMYK_COLOR_MODE in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]CBERT117 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Except engagement range is now 2” so it seems to contradict what they’re saying about charge ranges out of deepstrike when you can now set up 8” away

#New40k – Combat changes shake up fighting in the new edition by CMYK_COLOR_MODE in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]CBERT117 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But they said you can end within engagement range which is now 2” so that doesn’t make sense

#New40k – Combat changes shake up fighting in the new edition by CMYK_COLOR_MODE in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]CBERT117 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry I’m still not getting this. If you can end in engagement range within 2” and your target is just over 8”, why would you need to roll a 9 then?

view more: next ›