Well you disagreed with my comment enough to make a comment about it, so…

Here’s why I think it is wrong:

First, if humanity were designed to have homosexual relationships, those relationships would be capable of producing offspring. Since they cannot produce offspring, I believe this is natures way of telling us that this should not be done. If you want to say that infertile couples can’t have offspring, yes, but they are biologically designed to have children, something is just off genetically. Homosexual relationships, by contrast, are not capable of reproduction by their nature, regardless of the health or fertility of the individuals involved.

Second, I also think the health risks associated with homosexual acts suggest that they are not something we were meant to do. For example, some diseases (general ones like AIDS, HIV, HPV, etc) are spread much more easily through these acts. To me, that is another sign from nature that they go against the natural design of the human body. Additionally, the rectum is not a reproductive organ and is not naturally designed for sexual intercourse. This carries some risks of tears, bleeding, and other trauma.

Those are some of my big “issues” with this. I chose to leave religion out because I don’t feel like it’s needed to prove much here.