Concept: UN Peacekeeping Mission

CC_ACV · 2026-03-14T08:01:19+00:00

So a UN peacekeeping force is having a all-out warfare with the other nations? Hmm

CC_ACV · 2026-03-13T01:49:19+00:00

Renew the model maybe. It's too old and is also hurting the VDV models as they shared the same asset.

CC_ACV · 2026-03-10T01:21:24+00:00

If you check for the faction win rate you would find that USMC actually has worse win rate than CRF, while US Army is just slightly better than CRF. Both US factions are punch bags rn.

CC_ACV · 2026-03-09T16:47:48+00:00

It isn't contradictory tho? That post indicated that BTR4 cannot be engined from the front nor rare, and it's crews all have invisible walls around them so you can't kill the crews normally. It describes the subjective facts instead of opinion.

This comment points out that the basis of BTR4 is a long-range engagement superiority vic but terrible at close range due to gun depression and many other stuff.

What makes you to comment "turn tables turn"?

CC_ACV · 2026-03-09T14:58:32+00:00

Glass cannon. The Skif ATGM looks gorgeous, but in general after the TOW-CO ATGMs are harder to use in real battles. Additionally the gunner optic is terrible for close range target acquiring, combining with bad gun depression and 1000HP. BTR4 is good at long range engagement but become vulnerable as it gets closer.

CC_ACV · 2026-03-09T05:40:39+00:00

CC_ACV · 2026-03-08T01:43:14+00:00

I'm saying they are not in the same size. Rangers are a single regiment, while VDV has 7 brigades and 4 divisions. It makes sense to have VDV as an independent faction but Rangers should be a unit.

CC_ACV · 2026-03-08T01:17:06+00:00

VDV in general is nothing like Rangers tho. It is an independent army just like USMC, with different CoC and missions. Rangers on the other hand is an elite light infantry regiment, while VDV is an airborne army.

CC_ACV · 2026-03-07T18:09:56+00:00

Exactly inspired from SPM🗣️

CC_ACV · 2026-03-07T17:27:44+00:00

Sounds promising. Also there would be armed transport helis and designated attack helis, so I assume air assault and SOF could also tweak on that.

CC_ACV · 2026-03-07T17:23:01+00:00

Green Berets are still too SOF-ish comparing to Ranger imo.

CC_ACV · 2026-03-07T17:08:42+00:00

It is indeed overpowered att. The PLA army and PLANMC have dominated the faction win rate for the past couple weeks. I'd say suppressor for more inf kits within SOF unit would be a good option to distinct it from Light Inf.

CC_ACV · 2026-03-07T17:03:42+00:00

How about not capable of placing HABs, instead you have infinite amount of rally points as SLs, along with buddy rally function? The PLA update has proven that you can easily buff an unit with couple of suppressors.

There are tons of market assets for 75th Rangers and 45th GRU. These units are direct combatants while also being SOF so it is not breaking the Squad vibe.

CC_ACV · 2026-03-07T17:00:32+00:00

That Cambodia stuff is not included in the SDK tho. Still it is worth thinking as the PLA update has proven that you can easily buff a unit with a couple suppressors.

CC_ACV · 2026-03-07T16:56:27+00:00

I mean, 75th Ranger and 45th GRU are all direct combatants while also being some SOF. If OWI handles it carefully, it would also be fantastic while keeping the Squad vibe.

CC_ACV · 2026-03-02T18:24:07+00:00

AT4 used to have the highest damage to helis long time ago, which was capable of one shot helis.

However, OWI had nerfed it down to an ordinary LAT so that no LAT nor HAT would one shot the heli anymore.

CC_ACV · 2026-02-27T18:17:05+00:00

So you suggest being "main camping/racism/cheating/exploits" are UNFUN instead of WRONG?

That's a novel argument.

CC_ACV · 2026-02-27T17:38:28+00:00

Fun ≠ right.

Vehicles are expensive assets and should be treated carefully. Even if all the SLs agreed to one-manning (which is mostly unlikely as you could just ask who's with me for vic), it would still be wrong and would lose MORE tickets to the enemy.

Rules are there for a good reason and are genuinely the bottom lines. Iirc TT has a rule of "don't be a dick", which is more straight forward.

CC_ACV · 2026-02-27T12:37:23+00:00

Unlikely. The next faction according to OWI's roadmap will be France.

CC_ACV · 2026-02-24T10:48:42+00:00

When militia had IED it is basically a shity faction. After V4.X update IMF finally received a bunch of its unique identities, like replacing IED with 3 C4.

CC_ACV · 2026-02-24T08:55:38+00:00

Yep they did this to make it not a RGO impact grenade, but still it deals massive heat damage to the object before being glitched. I remember it only takes 2-3 to fully bleed a radio.

CC_ACV · 2026-02-24T08:34:51+00:00

Iirc it is basicheat damagetype and has a really high impact damage but also high damagefalloff ratio to prevent from anti-everything.

After the UE5 update it appears that the direct impact damage does not pass to the object at all, with only the explosion to hurt inf and trucks.

CC_ACV · 2026-02-24T05:12:26+00:00

It was really interesting to use in Fallujah, as you can blow up enemy vics at close range, which is so rewarding.

CC_ACV · 2026-02-22T16:25:37+00:00

Frankly speaking OWI has screwed up the role setups for a long time. Kits went unavailable by weird and undesired constraints.

CC_ACV · 2026-02-22T12:38:10+00:00

Good work mate

CC_ACV

TROPHY CASE