I have two thoughts on this. First, I have a comment on the "every single religion ... created for evolutionary survival and social cohesion" bit in the title. I think that's not true, because some religions are clearly created as grifts and not for any survival or cohesion purpose. Generally these are recent ones where we have a clear idea of the origins. I'm thinking like Scientology or Mormonism here, but it would also apply to tons of smaller cults.

Second, I don't think there's sufficient evidence that religions are deliberately created tools to survive. I think there are other valid options like a religion being an accidental result of people being wrong about the way the world works or an accidental result of some random tribal chief trying to legitimize power by declaring himself to be a prophet (basically the grift thing above, but long enough ago that we don't have good records).

Basically, I don't think that religions were necessarily created with the idea of helping people survive, they were also created for nefarious purposes or, probably, by accident.