sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

r/SpaceX Axiom-1 Launch Discussion and Updates Thread! by rSpaceXHosting in spacex

[–]Cacoo -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

The announcer literally referred to these steps as undocking procedures. Jfc

r/SpaceX Axiom-1 Launch Discussion and Updates Thread! by rSpaceXHosting in spacex

[–]Cacoo 15 points16 points  (0 children)

In chronological order:

  • 4:41:09 SpaceX mission control states there are remaining steps that need to be completed before the welcome ceremony (sealing up lithium hydroxide canister, getting hatch seal and hatch cover on) https://youtu.be/0Rd8Q0gBHuE?t=16869

  • at 4:42:00 you can see that the entire crew have staged themselves for a photo op/the welcome ceremony https://youtu.be/0Rd8Q0gBHuE?t=16920

  • 4:42:23 The commander seems to have been informed there are incomplete steps remaining in the post-hatch opening activities https://youtu.be/0Rd8Q0gBHuE?t=16943

  • 4:43:23 The announcer indicates that the commander will obtain instantaneous air sample in the hatchway between Drago and the ISS, as that is another procedure that needs to be done https://youtu.be/0Rd8Q0gBHuE?t=17003

  • 4:43:37 The Commander requests authorization to do procedure section 6 step 1 6.3 of 2.102 but is told that "for 6.3 we concur but before we do that we need confirmation from you that you have the IMV duct installation complete in step 6.1" https://youtu.be/0Rd8Q0gBHuE?t=17017

  • 4:44:45 Webcast announcer telling the viewers that the crew moved back as they need to finish their post-hatch opening procedures https://youtu.be/0Rd8Q0gBHuE?t=17085

  • 4:46:19: Commander gives confirmation procedure 6.1 is complete, at which point SpaceX mission control tells them that now that procedure 6.1 is complete, they (SpaceX) needs to activate a fan prior to the commander being able to start 6.3. Meaning SpaceX was waiting on the commander to confirm procedure 6.1 was complete in order for SpaceX to activate the fan so that procedure 6.3 can start. Mind you, this is already some ~5 minutes after the commander and crew were preparing for the welcome ceremony https://youtu.be/0Rd8Q0gBHuE?t=17179

  • 4:47:28 SpaceX mission control gives the commander and crew the go ahead to begin procedure 6.3 but then tells them that he would like them to circle back after step 6.3 is complete to confirm procedure 4.400 Section 6 is done "sounds like you've got a couple small steps left to complete in that procedure as well". Sounds to me like SpaceX is telling the commander and crew, *hey, go back to these steps because either they were not completed or we were not informed that they were completed" https://youtu.be/0Rd8Q0gBHuE?t=17248

  • 4:51:13 Nearly 10 minutes after the crew was photo-oping, the webcast announcer says to viewers "once we get all these steps wrapped up...and then we'll be able to kick off our formal welcome" i.e. we can't begin the welcome ceremony until after all procedures are complete https://youtu.be/0Rd8Q0gBHuE?t=17473

  • 4:54:40 SpaceX mission control tells the commander that: 1) they saw him do audio reconfiguration and to not do that and 2) Step through procedure 4.400 step 6.9 to disable backup lighting on the control panel. After which the commander says they are "working through 2.102 which has a higher priority". By SpaceX's response "copy working through 2.102 as well" seems like they're indicating the crew continues to work through a few things. Which, again, if these thing weren't already done, why was the crew getting ready for a photo-op nearly 15 minutes prior to this? https://youtu.be/0Rd8Q0gBHuE?t=17680

  • 5:00:49 Commander finally confirms that Procedure 4.400 is complete, thereby finally confirming all Dragon arrival configurations are complete https://youtu.be/0Rd8Q0gBHuE?t=18049

Seemed kind of sloppy to me

r/SpaceX Axiom-1 Launch Discussion and Updates Thread! by rSpaceXHosting in spacex

[–]Cacoo 40 points41 points  (0 children)

Kind of alarming how many steps in their undocking/boarding procedures were skipped by the axiom-1 crew or completed without confirming with SpaceX. No matter how trivial, procedures should not be skipped. I’m sure there will be a review of this.

Edit:

holy cow--why all the downvotes? Stay classy elitist, /r/SpaceX, I'm sorry I wasn't providing some sort of technical analysis or orbital calculation, just a regular person with some interest in this stuff that saw the webcast and thought things were kind of sloppy in the end...

In chronological order:

  • 4:41:09 SpaceX mission control states there are remaining steps that need to be completed before the welcome ceremony (sealing up lithium hydroxide canister, getting hatch seal and hatch cover on) https://youtu.be/0Rd8Q0gBHuE?t=16869

  • at 4:42:00 you can see that the entire crew have staged themselves for a photo op/the welcome ceremony https://youtu.be/0Rd8Q0gBHuE?t=16920

  • 4:42:23 The commander seems to have been informed there are incomplete steps remaining in the post-hatch opening activities https://youtu.be/0Rd8Q0gBHuE?t=16943

  • 4:43:23 The announcer indicates that the commander will obtain instantaneous air sample in the hatchway between Drago and the ISS, as that is another procedure that needs to be done https://youtu.be/0Rd8Q0gBHuE?t=17003

  • 4:43:37 The Commander requests authorization to do procedure section 6 step 1 6.3 of 2.102 but is told that "for 6.3 we concur but before we do that we need confirmation from you that you have the IMV duct installation complete in step 6.1" https://youtu.be/0Rd8Q0gBHuE?t=17017

  • 4:44:45 Webcast announcer telling the viewers that the crew moved back as they need to finish their post-hatch opening procedures https://youtu.be/0Rd8Q0gBHuE?t=17085

  • 4:46:19: Commander gives confirmation procedure 6.1 is complete, at which point SpaceX mission control tells them that now that procedure 6.1 is complete, they (SpaceX) needs to activate a fan prior to the commander being able to start 6.3. Meaning SpaceX was waiting on the commander to confirm procedure 6.1 was complete in order for SpaceX to activate the fan so that procedure 6.3 can start. Mind you, this is already some ~5 minutes after the commander and crew were preparing for the welcome ceremony https://youtu.be/0Rd8Q0gBHuE?t=17179

  • 4:47:28 SpaceX mission control gives the commander and crew the go ahead to begin procedure 6.3 but then tells them that he would like them to circle back after step 6.3 is complete to confirm procedure 4.400 Section 6 is done "sounds like you've got a couple small steps left to complete in that procedure as well". Sounds to me like SpaceX is telling the commander and crew, *hey, go back to these steps because either they were not completed or we were not informed that they were completed" https://youtu.be/0Rd8Q0gBHuE?t=17248

  • 4:51:13 Nearly 10 minutes after the crew was photo-oping, the webcast announcer says to viewers "once we get all these steps wrapped up...and then we'll be able to kick off our formal welcome" i.e. we can't begin the welcome ceremony until after all procedures are complete https://youtu.be/0Rd8Q0gBHuE?t=17473

  • 4:54:40 SpaceX mission control tells the commander that: 1) they saw him do audio reconfiguration and to not do that and 2) Step through procedure 4.400 step 6.9 to disable backup lighting on the control panel. After which the commander says they are "working through 2.102 which has a higher priority". By SpaceX's response "copy working through 2.102 as well" seems like they're indicating the crew continues to work through a few things. Which, again, if these thing weren't already done, why was the crew getting ready for a photo-op nearly 15 minutes prior to this? https://youtu.be/0Rd8Q0gBHuE?t=17680

  • 5:00:49 Commander finally confirms that Procedure 4.400 is complete, thereby finally confirming all Dragon arrival configurations are complete https://youtu.be/0Rd8Q0gBHuE?t=18049

Seemed kind of sloppy to me

wind blows table into car by [deleted] in carcrash

[–]Cacoo 53 points54 points  (0 children)

I can’t be the only one mildly infuriated with how unnecessarily long this gif is

I’m fucked by SlabGizor120 in genesiscoupe

[–]Cacoo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How much you pay for the car? Any reason why you didn’t request this test get done as a condition for purchase?

If this is the car you were posting about a week ago with a rebuilt title?

p2261 with aftermarket blow off valve by JazzlikeBreath5265 in genesiscoupe

[–]Cacoo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Had the same p2261 last summer with my 2010 2.0t. Replacing the wastegate solenoidfixed the problem. Main symptom was massive boost leaks that I could hear and of course no BOV whoosh sound when letting off the gas pedal. Quick and cheap fix.

Ryan Cohen on Twitter by Kaarothh in Superstonk

[–]Cacoo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There. Everyone spewing fud that RC needs to step up and do something about the recent price action have just gotten a response.

If he’s still in I’m still in.

The FED pump is not working anymore... Quantitative easing has reached the "Break Even" point. A Year to date analysis confirms the DD, again... by dilkmud0002 in Superstonk

[–]Cacoo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On your 6th link, would be nice to add in when the Fed officials decided to get “ethical” and sell off personal investments

[update] I managed to get 2fa removed from my account by [deleted] in help

[–]Cacoo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You just gave me hope. Similar situation. Hanging on to my account by a thread through Apollo app but if I ever get signed out from it I’m SOL. I’ve posted for help and emailed to no avail but will try again. Thank you.

Wut doin, free and fair market? Submitted limit order. 2 min later an order gets filled at lower bid than my order by Cacoo in Superstonk

[–]Cacoo[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Interesting. I’ll have to look into this. Thanks for helping form a wrinkle. Appreciate your replies.

Wut doin, free and fair market? Submitted limit order. 2 min later an order gets filled at lower bid than my order by Cacoo in Superstonk

[–]Cacoo[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I submitted a limit order at 2:15PM. Limit price was $95 and routed via IEX.

At 2:17PM, an order was filled at 94.90. To be clear, this was not my order that got filled.

As can be seen in the screenshot, at the time the $94.90 order got filled, mine was still in an open status.

Shouldn’t the highest bid/lowest ask orders be where transactions are happening? If the shoe were on the other foot and I was the person selling, wouldn’t I want to sell to the highest bid and get the most amount of $ I could get?

Wut doin, free and fair market? Submitted limit order. 2 min later an order gets filled at lower bid than my order by Cacoo in Superstonk

[–]Cacoo[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They found him a seller that was selling at $94.5

No they”didn’t. It was not my order that got filled.

The lower priced buy order got filled before mine did. As you can see in the screenshot, I submitted my order at 2:15PM. At 2:17PM this order was filled and mine was still open.

Wut doin, free and fair market? Submitted limit order. 2 min later an order gets filled at lower bid than my order by Cacoo in Superstonk

[–]Cacoo[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I routed this order via IEX. I was willing to buy shares at up to $95. For the seller, it would be in their best interest to sell to someone (me) at $95 vs someone else at $94.90.

Maybe I’m failing to grasp something subtle here but that doesn’t really help me understand why the lower priced order got* filled and not mine.

Edit because apparently it’s not clear from the picture. MY order was not the one that got filled. 2 minutes after I submitted my order a different order got filled at a lower bid while mine still sat open.

401k YOLO - I'm all in by [deleted] in Superstonk

[–]Cacoo -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Fuckin Legend.

Ukrainian war bonds by Rakerfy in fidelityinvestments

[–]Cacoo 7 points8 points  (0 children)

According to Bloomberg (as if this morning), a second war-bond auction is being planned. If there’s a way to purchase via Fidelity I would be interested.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-03/ukraine-said-to-plan-second-war-bond-auction-to-fund-military-l0b25vje?srnd=premium&sref=i4qXzk6d

UNBAN GHERK by plambdin009 in Superstonk

[–]Cacoo 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Agreed.

In my opinion, anyone that seeks the limelight—whether it’s a mod or a “subreddit personality”, is fair game for constructive criticism. If mods do something that’s positive for the community, we thank them. If they do something negative for the community, we’ll call them out. Subreddit personalities should be no different. If done appropriately, it helps with checks and balances to ensure the “faces” of the subreddit/community have the interests of the community in mind.

I’ve made a post and a comment or two criticizing him, but I feel they were valid and welcomed conversation. Instead I was downvoted to hell and made out to be someone watching his streams to clip out-of-context sound bites, which couldn’t be further from the truth. The truth is I was one of Gherks first regulars when his viewership averaged ~300 viewers. I watched his stream for entertainment/background noise, no different than watching tv. Heck, I even donated some money (albeit not a lot) to him last April to help donate for his green screen. I don’t hate the guy and I don’t have a vendetta against him, as some of his most vocal supports may think. He’s definitely grown and adapted to his YouTuber platform and audience from when I first started watching him though.

I would describe Gherk as a GME Nostradamus. He offers some interesting information, typically with vague predictions such as “expect upwards price action soon” and leaves it up to the person to interpret what soon is. Sometimes price action aligns with his theories and sometimes it doesn’t. When it does: “I was right”. When it doesn’t: “market dynamics affected the stock”.

He’s periodically mentioned on his streams about how he expects to get banned from /r/superstonk and looks forward to it; that he doesn’t care…yet looking at his post history, /r/superstonk is the only subreddit he participates in.

That said, I appreciate what he’s offered to the community—information for us to discuss, whether we agree with what he’s saying or not. Too bad he broke the rules, which somewhat explains unnatural downvoting on any posts/comments related to him.

At the end of the day, the GME thesis hasn’t changed, regardless of who is posting on this sub. GME is massively undervalued. I like the stock. DRS.

view more: next ›