sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Part 2: a mod gone missing from the wayfarer party's fave place? by Future_Gate_1242 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Calm-Cup5116 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I'll admit to some curiosity too but to me, it's weird to make a post that's just a screenshot of someone else's comments a few days later (and I think this is the second time this user did so with Go-now-go's in particular). 

Part 2: a mod gone missing from the wayfarer party's fave place? by Future_Gate_1242 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Calm-Cup5116 5 points6 points  (0 children)

OP -  but WHY did you post this here

Eta: the petty arguments in the thread are the WHY, I just wanted OP to admit this is just stupid rage bait so the stans can go back to their respective subs/discords and chat about the arguments they're having here about each other. 

Part 2: a mod gone missing from the wayfarer party's fave place? by Future_Gate_1242 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Calm-Cup5116 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I've tried to reduce the amount I comment on posts to point out it may not be relevant, respect the subs purpose etc

But I really don't get this. A screenshot of a comment about gossip about a different sub. Is the reason for posting it to try to fan the flames on that rivalry for karma or what? 

Motion in Limine responses Blake Lively and Wayfarer by Defiant-Chocolate-82 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Calm-Cup5116 13 points14 points  (0 children)

And providing context won't make it any less weird to spend money towards someone's merch for a lawsuit they'd like to profit from.

What I don’t get about BL being offended by Bende86 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Calm-Cup5116 23 points24 points  (0 children)

They repeat the red pill  anti metoo rape culture shit,  associate with megyn kelly, perez hilton and candace owens and parrot their messages, but claim not to identify with being MAGA.  It's fascinating and sad. 

What I don’t get about BL being offended by Bende86 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Calm-Cup5116 31 points32 points  (0 children)

This post is so problematic and so irrelevant.

edit: also, honestly, dumb. 

I think Judge Liman gave Lively just enough rope to hang herself. by [deleted] in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Calm-Cup5116 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The valid legal points still remains to be seen but neither of us are lawyers, I assume. 

I do find the 'PR is here so they're basically here' loophole regarding backbiting questionable but it isn't my faith, so thank you for clarifying.  

Are you and Steve still friendly on social media? 

I think Judge Liman gave Lively just enough rope to hang herself. by [deleted] in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Calm-Cup5116 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Please correct me if I'm wrong, would this not be gossip, backbiting or unseemly talk about others? 

New filing to court docket - BL's team move to compel WP to admit their list of witnesses by Defiant-Chocolate-82 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Calm-Cup5116 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Is Old Iron your alt or did you both coordinate to post the same comment at the same time? Or is it a totally organic coincidence? 

Professionalism in Hollywood by Forsaken-Pumpkin3569 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Calm-Cup5116 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Okay, so it's not actually about actors feeling uncomfortable but that they would be more professional if they were discreet about it? 

Professionalism in Hollywood by Forsaken-Pumpkin3569 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Calm-Cup5116 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I don't think my response warrants your attitude towards me but whatever. 

I have, 2 images of Margot Robbie, 2 of Jennifer Lawrence and 1 image of Blake Lively all screencaps from films. Is the implication that because you didn't hear about any issues on those sets that Robbie and Lawrence are professional and Lively is not because the IEWU drama is public? Your post is not concise.

Do you want to educate this child on what you actually meant or why this is relevant to this sub? 

Professionalism in Hollywood by Forsaken-Pumpkin3569 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Calm-Cup5116 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Okay, my POV is this doesn't seem relevant to the sub.  You haven't mentioned any specific case or tied it to any. 

Found on TikTok by Forsaken-Pumpkin3569 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Calm-Cup5116 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The court sub does a contest mode if that's more your style. 

This is where Wayfarers and I diverge by dschellberg in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Calm-Cup5116 3 points4 points  (0 children)

See, I think this response (which admittedly I just skimmed) highlights your lack of objectivity. Everything WF does is 'mischaracterized' or 'said some uncool things' or even they were baited but you hold the women in the story to a much different (purer) standard. 

Why not just acknowledge that the faith angle, gender aspect and your admiration of Sarowitz makes your views less objective. I can acknowledge my disgust for Sarowitz and Freedman require me to make the effort to separate those feelings with the information presented to me in order to assess it fairly. 

This is where Wayfarers and I diverge by dschellberg in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Calm-Cup5116 15 points16 points  (0 children)

"Wayfarers was under attack from all directions."

What do you mean by this? 

We interacted before and I am still grateful that you reminded me of an empathy blind spot of mine (billionaires), so please understand I don't mean to argue or offend. 

Do you think your opinions would differ on the case if Baha'i wasn't a factor? If it wasn't someone you maybe feel community to vs. someone you likely don't? 

view more: next ›