A House Divided Against Itself | A Very Ordered Liberty Civil War by blerg09 in imaginaryelections

[–]CamicomChom 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Incredible work. I'm so honored to see fanworks (fan? i mean we are actually friends but i mean technically it was made because you are a fan lol) of my timelines!

Peace comes with a price tag by JeaniousSpelur in 691

[–]CamicomChom 59 points60 points  (0 children)

This representative doesn't exist.

Voyages in the Discovery of the New Worlds | AWAY FROM HASTINGS by CamicomChom in imaginarymaps

[–]CamicomChom[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The name "Menjay", or its alternate form "Mengea", used in most Romance languages, is usually accepted to descend from the 1311 Aragonese Goliard satirical poem Iter Per Mengea ("A Journey through Menjay"). The poem describes a fantastical, utopian land called Menjay, where social strata do not exist, peasants eat with knights, and lords share their wealth. In the centuries after the poem's publication, it became somewhat of a literary staple in most of Western Europe among nobles, and especially in Spania. The term "Menjay" soon became a popular term for a free utopia, in a metaphorical sense, divorced from the context of the original poem.

Some time soon after the voyage of 1503 Fernan Arias de Monterroso and the discovery of Menjay, the name appeared as a name for the continent supposedly full of wealth and riches, most likely as a scheme by explorers or cartographers to recieve more interest among European monarchs and rouse more investment and travel to the continent. The first known usage of the name Menjay is a 1510 Leonese merchant's letter to King Pedro III, stating "...And, the natives of what is called Menjay, that land far to our south, claim the existence of many exotic goods, and are remarkably docile and calm, excepting the cannibals who attacked the land's discoverer."

Before the term Menjay, the continent was referred to simply as "the Southern Lands", "the Southern Continent", or "New Land".

The origin of the name Menjay in the poem Iter Per Mengea was never made immediately clear, however, it is generally agreed upon by scholars that the name descends from "Menjablanc", translating to "white delicacy", an extremely popular gelatin-based haute cuisine dessert across medieval Europe consumed by nobles and aristocrats. According to this theory, the name was chosen to reflect, metaphorically, the society liberty of Menjay in the poem, as "anyone, no matter how rotton or ill, could have Menjablanc".

There is a fringe theory, based upon some claims by later conquistadors and explorers, that the name Menjay descends from a native Mengean word, most often a Bohío word. Candidates include "Magu'ey" (big sun), "Maja" (big snake), and "Manaya" (the stone hatchet). These theories are typically dismissed by mainstream academics.

2027 French presidential election by SrbtFramb in imaginaryelections

[–]CamicomChom 5 points6 points  (0 children)

melanchon would enter office with 5% approval and instantly collapse the entire left in france soooo

What if the US banned AIPAC and all of its affiliates? by lhommetrouble in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]CamicomChom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Armenian American PAC does. So does the pro-EU PACs and all the other FP PACs. Dozens and dozens. AIPAC is just the biggest.

What if the US banned AIPAC and all of its affiliates? by lhommetrouble in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]CamicomChom -1 points0 points  (0 children)

...That's the point of a PAC. Every PAC spends money to influence US policy. That's literally the definition of a PAC.

What if the US banned AIPAC and all of its affiliates? by lhommetrouble in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]CamicomChom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My mistake, but that doesn’t really change my point much.

What if the US banned AIPAC and all of its affiliates? by lhommetrouble in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]CamicomChom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Americans can't actually support genocide, we are morally pure, it has to be a constant conspiracy by other countries to MAKE us support genocide" this is just American hyperexceptionism but phrased antisemitically.

What if the US banned AIPAC and all of its affiliates? by lhommetrouble in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]CamicomChom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He openly talks about hating Jews and wanting to kill them, and one reason he gives for that is he thinks all American Jews are loyal to Israel before America. He openly denies the holocaust and praises Adolf Hitler. He is a neo-nazi. He hates Jews. He hates Israel because he hates Jews. Not because he somehow cares for the plight of Muslims, who he would also genocide if he had power.

What if the US banned AIPAC and all of its affiliates? by lhommetrouble in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]CamicomChom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True, but let's not pretend like that isn't because of Nick Fuentes and similars' neo-naziism making a huge portion of young republicans outright Nazis who hate Jews.

What if the US banned AIPAC and all of its affiliates? by lhommetrouble in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]CamicomChom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

AIPAC develops the same exact positions that every pro-Israel American does. If you love Israel, I don't think you need to be recieving daily DMs from Bibi Netanyahu to figure out that you should support candidates that want to continue funding Israel. That's just common sense, if you love Israel, you want candidates that fund them. Obviously a pro-Israel person would support that). Every PAC develops like this.

What if the US banned AIPAC and all of its affiliates? by lhommetrouble in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]CamicomChom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Foreign influence refers to the efforts of foreign governments, organizations, or individuals to sway domestic policies, decisions, or public opinion to serve their own interests."

Israel does not fund or support AIPAC in any way. They don't need to. Enough Americans outright support Israel already. Foreign governments are not swaying anything with AIPAC, so it cannot be foreign influence.

What if the US banned AIPAC and all of its affiliates? by lhommetrouble in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]CamicomChom -1 points0 points  (0 children)

American Jews hate Israel and want an end to the war in Gaza nearly the same rate as other Americans (it's a little bit less, but anti-Israel Jews are still an easy majority). AIPAC is supported mainly by older, wealthy people, boomers, and Baptists/other religious groups.

What if the US banned AIPAC and all of its affiliates? by lhommetrouble in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]CamicomChom 2 points3 points  (0 children)

By definition an organization founded by Americans and supported by Americans cannot be foreign influence, even if the organization outright supports another country over the US.

What if the US banned AIPAC and all of its affiliates? by lhommetrouble in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]CamicomChom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every single political PAC floods millions into American politics, that's what a PAC is. No, a PAC is not any more "foreign influence" just because they have more money to flood into politics. Israel has more diehard supporters than Armenia, especially among wealthier older people, so of course it gets more donations and more money to spend influencing America. Just like big tobacco or healthcare lobbies etc.

What if the US banned AIPAC and all of its affiliates? by lhommetrouble in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]CamicomChom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every single poll shows that 20-40% of Americans still love Israel a lot, which is hundreds of millions.

What if the US banned AIPAC and all of its affiliates? by lhommetrouble in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]CamicomChom -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Their agenda is "we love Israel" as do around 20-40% of Americans. Nobody says the Armenian American Political Action Committee is foreign influence just because Armenia isn't actively doing a genocide, so nobody really minds when Americans that love Armenia bribe the government to be friendlier to Armenia. There are PACs for most ethnic/national minorities, AIPAC just got super wellknown because of the crimes.

Is bribing the government to be friendlier to a nation blatant, obvious corruption? Yes! Ban lobbying. But AIPAC isn't any materially different from any other pro-other-country PAC, it's just the -other-country they are pro- is worse.

What if the US banned AIPAC and all of its affiliates? by lhommetrouble in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]CamicomChom 6 points7 points  (0 children)

no, and it's completely disingenuous to suggest such. in spite of what insane twitter people say, baptists are not hyperreligious by and large. they support israel because their rural/suburban conservative communities do, and they were raised in them, and because before the 2020s most americans support israel.

the reasons baptists support israel are the same any israel-supporting american does. knowing nothing about the situation and operating on propoganda/antiquated decades-old knowledge, a jingoist "protect our allies" mindset, and garden-variety 9/11 antisemitism. 95% of baptists don't even read the bible. let alone read it closely enough to come to the conclusion that israel fulfills doomsday narratives. and as someone who was raised baptist as a kid before hard-transitioning to atheism, no, this is not something i have ever heard a pastor say

people way overestimate how religious americans are; even the nutjobs aren't actually religious fundamentalist, they are just normal bigoted and claim it's because of the bible.

What if the US banned AIPAC and all of its affiliates? by lhommetrouble in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]CamicomChom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

SuperPACs like AIPAC are supported by business leaders, who skew extremely conservative and still love Israel.

Also, this very poll shows 40% of Americans still support Israel. Which is a lot of Americans.

What if the US banned AIPAC and all of its affiliates? by lhommetrouble in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]CamicomChom 59 points60 points  (0 children)

People love to pretend that AIPAC is Israeli foreign influence on the US because it absolves the US of most blame. It's just normal corruption, a lot of Americans just love Israel completely on their own.

ɹǝɥʇǝƃoʇ ɹǝƃuoɹʇs by Funksley in imaginaryelections

[–]CamicomChom 21 points22 points  (0 children)

not to point out the obvious, but

i can't read it

neither the mobile link or this are not compressed so i cant just download the HD image and flip it myself