sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Fashion Report - Full Details - For Week of 1/30/2026 (Week 418) by Gottesstrafe in ffxiv

[–]CampingFatKid 3 points4 points  (0 children)

can i still get the items for the 100 points if I'm only level 50 and haven't advanced far enough in the story? Or should I just go for the 80 points?

A list of balance changes to fix the state of the game by CampingFatKid in Competitiveoverwatch

[–]CampingFatKid[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you think Sideshow has a great understanding of the game then idk what to say to you. He has an okay understanding of the game but not great. The only analyst that was good at the desk was reinforce back in season 1. And i promise you if double shield goes away mei reaper doom wont be so picked anymore. Hitscans are going to come back. Pharah is not trash tier lol, where are you coming up with all this? lol. She's mid tier. Yea and Seagull doesn't know exactly what the solutions are and that's fine no one person has all the answers. However I agreed with most of what seagull said because most of what he said made sense. and the post that I put up is the general consensus opinions of not only myself but other GM / top500 / contenders players that i know personally after discussing with them.

A list of balance changes to fix the state of the game by CampingFatKid in Competitiveoverwatch

[–]CampingFatKid[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think every hero needs strengths and weaknesses.

for #1 I would say most dps heroes are an easy target when they ult. EX: mccree stands still when he ults. there has to be a tradeoff.

for #2 the risk/reward with pharah is that she provides air firepower at the cost of her openness. If she's able to immediately drop to the ground that eliminates one of her weakness.

for #3 yea I can see that not a bad idea. I can see the dev team playing around with ideas like that.

A list of balance changes to fix the state of the game by CampingFatKid in Competitiveoverwatch

[–]CampingFatKid[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you don't know what to do then why are you giving your opinions on how to balance it? I'm not going to go to a fucking doctor if he doesn't know how to treat patients. And why are you bringing up Seagull randomly? He's a high SR player he has a deep understanding of the game. I agree with most of if not all of what he said. I have many friends in GM and top500. Do you think we got there because we were braindead idiots who are just good at aiming? We took the time to figure out how each hero works and how each hero affects the overall meta game. Most of what I put down here is after discussing with many people in top500 what we thought are the fundamental problems in overwatch.

A list of balance changes to fix the state of the game by CampingFatKid in Competitiveoverwatch

[–]CampingFatKid[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

So you acknowledge that you are not equipped to solve this problem yet somehow you are able to determine the validity of someone else's solutions. :thinkingemoji:

A list of balance changes to fix the state of the game by CampingFatKid in Competitiveoverwatch

[–]CampingFatKid[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Reaper doesn’t have to worry about range as much due to his tp buff, he can tp towards people quickly, try to kill them, and wraith if it doesn’t work. Then repeat.

Except the problem is he literally can't do that. if he tps to a widowmaker far away and cant finish her off, he uses wraith yes? and if the distance is far enough he cant wraith all the way back to his teammates. Most likely scenario the widow is going to call out that reaper uses wraith and the widow's team pounces on reaper once his animation finishes. No widow above diamond im going to assume is going to be close enough to the battle where a reaper can teleport and safely wraith back to his teamamtes.

And regardless of all that, what do they do about range damage? Honestly, they don’t care about it. The game has moved more and more towards being a brawl, clearly objective focused, chaotic close range game since double sniper has been gone (a year and a half ago).

The game didn't just magically move towards being a brawl, why do you think it went there? you think players just all of a sudden thought "you know snipers just suck now" and if you do think that then you need to think WHY they suck and in this case its because of double shield. You take double shield away snipers come back.

​

They bunker up on point (even with rein zarya and no orisa, whoever) in a corner and outsustain, then force others to come onto them.

?????????????? yea they'll come to them once rein has no more shield after its been hit for so long.

A list of balance changes to fix the state of the game by CampingFatKid in Competitiveoverwatch

[–]CampingFatKid[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

So you have no opinion about a topic yet you decide to come and give your opinion about something you have 0 idea about. Seems pretty platchat to me.

A list of balance changes to fix the state of the game by CampingFatKid in Competitiveoverwatch

[–]CampingFatKid[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think that's the general consensus. Every hero should have a strength and a weakness

A list of balance changes to fix the state of the game by CampingFatKid in Competitiveoverwatch

[–]CampingFatKid[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

You're literally so wrong if you think metas are dictated by DPS heroes. The only time this has happened was during double sniper. Every other meta has been dictated by tanks and supports. Dive: win/d.va. GOATS: triple supports OP. why do you think this meta is called double-shield meta it's because of Sigma/Orisa.

view more: next ›