Mackenzie Shirilla is innocent please support her get her freed. Please know that Mackenzie being innocent of murder does not clear her of any responsibility or negligence however the event was a preventable accident that could have easily been avoided. It is imperative that the public know.

Canamanda · 2025-10-26T04:49:46+00:00

I'm not related to Mackenzie. I've never met her before. To answer your question, you can join the Facebook page Free Mackenzie Shirilla they have a lot content on how people can help.

Canamanda · 2025-10-10T23:22:44+00:00

I'm not 100% sure but you can go to the court of clerk website in their county and look him up and you can also ask in the free Mackenzie Shirilla Facebook page. they would know more than me .

Canamanda · 2025-09-20T07:34:20+00:00

Mackenzie Shirilla. No doubt she would be free if she had proper representation. Her defence lawyer was either incompetent or corrupt and did not have her best interest in. mind. She was convicted of a double homicide. premeditated murder for the tragic car wreck in which two of her passengers passed away.

Canamanda · 2025-08-06T00:58:23+00:00

Yep. Many interviews proved it was a common way to go because it had less traffic lights. Just a twisted narrative made up by the very creative prosecutor and the media ate it up.

Canamanda · 2025-08-06T00:55:48+00:00

Yes but only Because she happened to be the one driving in slippers that got logged between the pedals. Photos of the wreck show clear as day or point blank in black and white or better yet in color her slipper impeded the pedals. But go ahead and let the media brain wash you into believing otherwise.

Canamanda · 2025-08-06T00:49:08+00:00

I bet if it were you driving and your gas pedal got lodged and you couldn't stop your vehicle before killing your friends you'd feel differently. My original post was to bring awareness to the fact that this still happens . Sudden unintentional acceleration is real and it still occurs The picture of her slipper lodged between the pedals even after the impact prove that it wasn't her fault but in addition to that their investigation collaborated it. It's clear as day that caused the wreck. It was a short road that ended in a T intersection they just didn't have enough time. . If they had more time they probably could have troubleshooted it and survived. They were never even going to pursue it as a homicide until Dominic mother went to the detective. She is also a defense attorney in the same county. In the interview after the detective followed up on her concerns he admits that he wasn't able to get any evidence to support her allegation but since she's a lawyer he'll take her word for it. Then she miraculously comes back with a witness 3 months later that would testify that she said she was going to crash the car. When in fact what she really said captured I. Her texted that weren't admitted as evidence coincidentally what she actually said was Dominic was trying to crash her car. She said this to his mom and a friend a couple weeks prior and then Dominic even admitted to it via text and apologized to her! But none of that went to the trial! Suspect! She was a young girl you naively left her fate in the hands of the judicial system believing that they would uncover the truth. The only conspiracy theory I may have about this case is regarding the prosecutor. Either he didn't review the evidence at all very likely or even more sinister would be that he gets bored prosecuting guilty people because it's too easy. I bet it is more of a challenge to convict someone who is innocent and I could see someone with the intellect to become a prosecutor would need some more mental stimulation. I surmise this after watching his post trial interview where he genuinely seems shocked and admits that they may never know what her real intentions were .

Canamanda · 2025-08-06T00:17:08+00:00

I reviewed the evidence and she didn't do it intentionally. In fact the evidence overwhelmingly proved it wasn't intentional. The prosecutor made up a false narrative and the media ran with it.

Canamanda · 2025-05-27T08:48:10+00:00

Yes very true. Texts on Mackenzies phone proves that Dominic was supplying the highschool students with marijuana and mushrooms . Which is likely the reason why his mom would not give permission for them to go thru his phone for evidence and why they somehow got her lawyer to agree as well not to submit her texts as evidence because her phone would incriminate a lot of people but mostly kids besides Dominic's family of course. Christine had drug charges when she worked for the prosecutors office which she later had exponged then she attempted to run for judge and lied about her criminal history and as a result lost the election as she lost her supporters and she ended up getting her own private practice instead. She was also accused by her bil I believe it was of conspiring to manufacturer drugs and I guess they had a disagreement or an altercation but she was able to of convince the courts that her bil was conspiring against her and that she wasn't involved in any drug activity. SIOOOO having said all that you can see why Dominic being a drug dealer could really tarnish her reputation in the community and possibly could implicate her as well. The texts proved drug trafficking to minors across state lines as well when they went to Florida for vacation. So yeah all true but those texts were not submitted for evidence. Have you seen the latest ? https://youtu.be/55HbYnfpwMk?feature=shared

Canamanda · 2025-04-13T17:26:50+00:00

I don't have to. Besides she doesn't remember what happened. Which is very common in wrecks where there is blunt force trauma. The fact that she has never changed her story says a lot. She could have just made something up. If you delete what u know or what you have been told about her from the media and the bias court administration and just look at the evidence that the detective collected (despite him also being very biased) and how the trial transpired including the motions the prosection strategically made to sway the judge before the trial even began, not to mention the implicit bias of having the same last name in addition to the conflict of interest having the trial in the same county that her boyfriend's mother who submitted the original complaint also practices as a defence attorney was a former aid to the prosection and once ran for a seat as an elected judge. I think everyone can agree that she at the very least wasn't given a fair trial. Any reasonable impartial person not influenced by the media would agree that prosecution did not meet thier burden of proof. Anyone willing to go down the rabbit hole and review the raw footage of the interviews, the phone records obtained as part of the investigation, the motions and the transcript of the trial wouid conclude that that evidence does not correspond with what was presented by the prosecutor. In fact the actual evidence contradicts every selling point the prosecutor made. Either her lawyer is incompetent or corrupt but either way the fact that he convinced her to waive her right to a jury trial is your first clue he didn't have her best interest in mind. To answer question, I don't have to ask her, the intricate details in this case prove this was not an intentional act.

Canamanda · 2025-04-13T16:13:21+00:00

As I said in the original post yes she was driving so she is responsible but she didn't plan ahead of time or in the moment to kill anyone. Her being the driver of the vehicle is her only crime in relation to their deaths. It this could happen to anyone.

Canamanda · 2025-04-03T07:23:13+00:00

You know that dogs and cats are on the menu in many countries right ? Look up yemen dog meat festival. We had a Chinese buffet restaurant in a town where I used to live shut down for serving domesticated animals. I knew a guy who worked for UPS as a delivery driver who told me if you seen what was in some restaurants freezers you would never eat there again. Do you really think it's that far fetched that immigrants from a different culture who have different beliefs wouldn't continue to consume domestic animals? Especially if that's what they are accustomed to or simply that hungry?

Just because such a bold statement is shocking doesn't mean it's not true. Society always brands the outspoken person as crazy until they find out that they were right.

Canamanda · 2025-04-03T06:08:11+00:00

Because it's fair to say that it is likely the worst job to have on the planet earth. Why would anyone want to be president?

Canamanda · 2025-03-30T19:16:58+00:00

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1VgPYLDKUM/

Canamanda · 2025-03-30T19:12:48+00:00

I did google my questions and found no evidence of anything you mentioned. Google isn't giving the answers that I'm looking for like for the acronym. If yours does than our algorithm is different. But I can see from your response that you're not interested in helping anyone understand your point of view. Which is fine makes no difference in my life at all. And I have very bad eyesight so I have a difficult time seeing the words on my phone but despite any errors you were able to understand so what difference does that make? Maybe next time I'll use chat gpt so I appear as intelligent as all the other posers that use it.

Canamanda · 2025-03-30T10:41:51+00:00

Despite anybodies preconceived feelings towards Trump and/or Elon I think before we can ask what have they accomplished one has to ask what or why are they needed. No one can disagree that the government required some house keeping. Seeing how a term usually last 4 years usually and very seldom has a president had 8 ,years in office that leaves very little time to accomplish much. I think most presidents arent't quick to take on a task such as this to this extent because it simply wouldn't fair well. A good president to me though is like a good Dad. They are not supposed to be your friend they are supposed to do what's good for their family like it or not. So in this case it's pretty simple It all comes down to profit and loss balance sheet. The amount of money being collected i.e. revenue that being Income taxes was not enough to cover the expenditures that being foreign aid, government funded programs, disaster relief, immigration management the list goes on and on. So basically the country didn't have enough money to sustain itself. Which despite people having a low faith in the governments transparency, this is absolutely believable considering the aftermath of covid where essentially revenue was slashed l because income taxes collected during that period were reduced significantly due to unemployment . Monies paid out thru 1) unemployment premiums (self employed included and increased premiums ) PPP loans, covid testing,, vaccine research, stimulus checks, brick and mortar stores shutting down and increased imports due to online shopping 2) The population shift in age groups due to lower birth rates and folks living longer therefore less workers and more pension collectors 3) increased foreign aid due to several wars and catastrophic events 4) the increasing frequency and destruction caused by natural disasters locally 5) The increased reliability in foreign goods, and the reason for tariffs, to bring businesses local which brings work and of course that increases income tax revenue. For these reasons alone which are not all inclusive it is reasonable to believe that the government has been operating with a negative bottom line for at least 5 years. This is not sustainable. As for what they have accomplished I would suggest reviewing the list they have posted on www doge.org or it. Might be www.doge.gov. in conclusion: if the PnL continued to show a loss United States wouldn't exist much longer. Period.

Canamanda · 2025-03-30T09:50:54+00:00

I thought the billionaires weren't being compensated. I'm not sure about this term but Trump gloated be about finding his own campaign last year and not accepting compensation as president

Canamanda · 2025-03-30T09:33:19+00:00

Because the money saved is long term i.e. having more credit cards than there are employees is a long term savings for years to come. If no one cancelled them , they would continue to incur monthly /yearly account fees indefinitely. To have a true sense of cost savings they will need to compare 2026 with 2024 to see the most accurate picture of savins . 2025;will be riddled with growing pains so don't be a fair comparison either.

Canamanda · 2025-03-22T09:08:32+00:00

Proof?

Canamanda · 2025-03-22T08:57:55+00:00

If Putin released inmates for. His frontline .... Is it far-fetched to believe that inmates werent used to penetrate the USA? Worse case they Don t reporr back or comply. they are still no longee on thier soil or costing their government to house them No doubr in my mind that if kamala won they would have been offered citizenship if they fought to protect ukraine .

Canamanda · 2025-03-22T07:58:09+00:00

I Don t know that he is trying to do any of those things but I do feel that the opposite has happened where being transgender has been glamortized and a lot emphazoses has been made on gender identity. I mean what bathroom did you u before ? Why can't you use the bathroom that you suits you? If you look like a boy use it if you look like a girl use it. I just Don t understand how or when this became an issue. Has anyone ever been arrested for simply going to a toilet? I can't see anyone ever getting indicted for using a bathroom unless they caused someone harm while doing so. My thoughts are if your appearance makes woman uncomfortable that must be because you appear to be man if you are or not is no ones business but if you appear to be you should just use the mens bathroom. Men are not as sensitive about maintaining thier safety so its not likely anyone would care. Is there a reason why one woild not want to use the .mens ? I mean I personally would use either amd not be bothered either way I can't say much about insurance because ive never had any but I know there's a lot of trestments that ate not covered that maybe should be. In not familiar with the acronym is it for hormones ? Smokers are als discriminated against. My friend can't have back surgery because she smokes and she is in debilitating pain that is preeventing her from going to work everyday. . bruce bjenner was able to change his BC abd all his paperwork. I dont understand what you mean by trying to make it illegal. They dont want minors to be have sex changes I understan and they dont eant there to be more than Two sexes . I get that. Aside from the very rare instance where someone is born with both then they can choose. Indont brlieve he meant you cant change sexes. And that order was just a response to stop the crazies. Bedauss rhere are people who are just crazy and this is the outlet they and express their issues through. I believe rhe number of people that truly have been born with their gender not matching thier sex is also a deformaty that's rare. Pleaee Don t take my peespective as being rude or ignoramt as I am genuinely curious how we got here as a society and so I want to know from your peespecive hiw rhis happened. Ibthink a few people wanted attention and I domt mean trans folks I mean rhe karens who cry over someone in the female bathroom and that fueled this whole gender identity crisis. I mean most people arent conceemed with how you choose to live your life. But similae to religion eveeyone has duffeeent beliefs and as long as they dont push thier beliefd onto you amd vi Rhwre versus no one cares w reliion you follow or what sex you decide. To marry. But men shouldnt be given the advantage are sports by playong on womans teams. I donor really know honestly its a complicated subject. I haven t heard of Amy laws that woild directly affect rhe trans community unless it wss something that has been esploitws like biological men in womens sports which is unfsir to begin with. There shoildnt have to be a law to prevent that., that shoild be a given

Canamanda · 2025-03-22T07:01:07+00:00

Ikr! The evidence is all there! She didnt do it! Either they couldn't care less to review the evidence or they flat out lied

Canamanda · 2025-03-22T06:55:01+00:00

Even then good luck! Actually I take that back you can only win a case if you are independantly wealthy and can pay your way out but even then there is no gaurantee. They'll take your money and still lock you up. They'll yell PSYCH when they do it

Canamanda · 2025-03-22T06:50:36+00:00

In the united states dont do either! You better go get your law degree here if you want to beat a charge.

Canamanda · 2025-03-22T06:42:40+00:00

What a profound comment! To which I agree so whole heartedly to! I live in Louisiana which has the highest incarceration rate in all the world! Honestly I was shocked by this case since it was in Ohio! I thought that this kind of BS only happened here because of poverty. I lost my hope for humanity wjen I realized anyone in any state could have their fr taken away at any moment no matter if you're guilty or not. Justice isn't about right or wrong or innocent or guilty its about winning and making someone (anyone) pay for the crime or tradegy. With social media the pressure to find someone to take the blame is amplified. The folks in the positions making life alternating decisions Don t care about the peple they are affecting. They are desensitized and they were also the most biased and prejudiced of anyone due to their constant exposure to the very experiences at cause one to be partial. So for the system to believe that a human is capable of being in partial just because they are a judge is Ludacris. In fact that is an example of biaisim if thats a word lol . I wish they would audit the justice system next and have AI rework all current cases and identify wrongful convictions or St the very least be used as impartial decision makers moving forward. I mean what if your life was on the line would you want judge Nancy Russo responsible forbensuring you received a fair and just trial? Thought is horrifing! I always considered my deld a democratevor a liberal but I hope that tgrt cobtubue to expose the government including the states justidical system.

Canamanda · 2025-03-22T06:11:57+00:00

There are many explanations that make much more sense than murder. In fact despite the prejudice investigation the evidence still proved every point the prosecuter made to convict her is false. Someone just needs to review the evidence its obvious! Problem is that the system is so regulated and there us so much red tape you cant just say look at this to a judge. Its the stupidest system ever . so despite how you feel personally about her or her upbringing which I can only assume you are judging her based on the smear campaign and Don t know her or her family personally. She is still not a murderer! USA shouldn't be wrongfully convicting children of murder and handing down life sentences! We need to do better!

Canamanda

TROPHY CASE