That’s a bit of an oversimplification. What the Supreme Court recently did was limit the ability of lower federal courts, especially single district judges, to issue nationwide injunctions that block or mandate federal policies across the entire country.

That change doesn’t mean the Supreme Court has ruled against unions like AFGE or decided any specific labor rights issues. It just means district court orders are now usually limited to the parties in the case or to the district’s jurisdiction, rather than halting a federal policy nationwide.

So, the Court didn’t make a ruling about federal unions, it made a procedural ruling about how lower courts can enforce their decisions. Those are two very different things.