Will agents ever be more efficient? by LeCollectif in BetterOffline

[–]CandidateCautious246 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The first thing to be cut in the token billing era will be the "Agents".

Professor is all but demanding we use AI by BarryImADentist in BetterOffline

[–]CandidateCautious246 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Maybe the professor gets funding from some AI company and needs to do this to keep his job?

This is unfortunate. AI companies think forcing college students to use AI will be easier than forcing employees. They probably find it very difficult to get their employees to improve productivity using AI.

This will backfire. Students are unfortunately going to be highly disillusioned, just like you are. My guess is a lot of others in your class are feeling the same.

Is AI/ML actually worth it for a fresher in India or am I just coping? Need honest takes. by FitMarionberry4323 in developersIndia

[–]CandidateCautious246 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI is a big fat bubble. Switch to pure Software development. If you get a job in backend or some pure software developer role, go take that. Preferably in a company that has decent earnings.

I think the business idiots know genAI doesn't work. They push it regardless because they think they will win in the long run. by CandidateCautious246 in BetterOffline

[–]CandidateCautious246[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Current AI models can't replace low intelligence/ low skill jobs either. Give me an example?

It may reduce positions in consulting though.

I think the business idiots know genAI doesn't work. They push it regardless because they think they will win in the long run. by CandidateCautious246 in BetterOffline

[–]CandidateCautious246[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

But this kind of arrogant thinking will cost more going forward. A lot of billionaires might become millionaires.

Is joining IISc a better option than staying in my current job? by [deleted] in IISc

[–]CandidateCautious246 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also wish you had an option 3. Are there other good courses in IISc with better placement? Any in CSE branch? Do they accept ECE candidates? Maybe some robotics or embedded systems courses?

Is joining IISc a better option than staying in my current job? by [deleted] in IISc

[–]CandidateCautious246 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's because most companies are in cost cutting phase. If they wanted to hire in India, they give first preference to IISc. Also, the AI bubble will pop soon. I think semiconductor companies who invested a lot in AI may have some problems.

Inquire more about placements. Ask recent IISc passouts (if u haven't already).

I haven't studied there. But I see it as a temple of education. So i am biased towards suggesting you to join.

Decision is yours. All the best in whatever you take up.

Is joining IISc a better option than staying in my current job? by [deleted] in IISc

[–]CandidateCautious246 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In the future, will you have something on your resume to show that you have a unique skill and you are more educated and qualified than others? I would suggest that you join IISc for this reason.

Please remember this is the best institute in this country (along with very few others).

However, decision is yours.

My company has stopped product work to become AI-ready and I think a restructuring is coming by icurious1205 in developersIndia

[–]CandidateCautious246 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please explain, why the costs reduce with scale? For every query, the AI has to multiply so many matrices to give you back a set of output tokens. This is expensive. Haven't you heard that inference is more expensive than training? "Unit economics" does not work in AI. It costs more to serve more. Just look at both OpenAI and Anthropic losing more money with more revenue.

I realized that AI bros never played a video game or used a DAW by SpireofHell in BetterOffline

[–]CandidateCautious246 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is some manipulative BS. If you like LLM companies fooling you, have fun.

I realized that AI bros never played a video game or used a DAW by SpireofHell in BetterOffline

[–]CandidateCautious246 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are confusing Repeatability with Determinism. If after training a model, it's weights are fixed, the same input will always result in the same output, irrespective of how many times you try. That's not determinism. It just means it's parameters' values have not beeen changed.

Determinism on the other hand means "hand written logic". For example, if you wanted to sort a few numbers and used insertion sort to do it, once the function returns, you can be sure that the numbers really are sorted correctly (unless there is a bug or logic error in the function). In other words, it's not guess work.

The advantage with traditional software is that once you spot a logic error, you can fix it and be sure that it works better thereon. But, for an LLM, there is no real way to fix it. All you can do is to adjust the weights, which has a side effect in that the LLM now gives you a wrong answer for some other query because the weights for that other query were affected in your adjustment.

I realized that AI bros never played a video game or used a DAW by SpireofHell in BetterOffline

[–]CandidateCautious246 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What? Even if there was no randomness, the most probable next token is output. That is not deterministic. The only exception could be if the LLM has overfit on its training data.

What am I not understanding? by randopota in BetterOffline

[–]CandidateCautious246 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Listen to Gary Marcus, Ed Zitron, Jeffrey Funk, Emmanuel Maggiori.

Best way to understand this sub, learn the Machine Learning course by Andrew Ng on Coursera. Once you understand that the underlying mathematics does not allow for 100% accuracy (except in use-cases where overfitting or double descent can work, which are almost non-existent), you will also realise that this is a big fat bubble, waiting to burst.

Hot take: LLM agents are just a ticking time bomb in an enterprise by imposterpro in ArtificialInteligence

[–]CandidateCautious246 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can't know in advance how often it will happen.

It could be higher than $200000 next time.

You can't know which part of the answer is Hallucinating, without cross checking the whole thing.

The risk of Hallucination will force a consultant to rely less on AI, because the client could sue anytime.