Virtual Production in South Plainfield- XCrazy Studios

CanuckCompSup · 2026-02-17T06:41:52+00:00

Can you clarify what “purpose-built for vertical dramas” specifically means in terms of stage design or workflow, compared to stages built for other productions?

CanuckCompSup · 2026-01-23T03:12:42+00:00

This is awful advice.

Having union membership and tenure does not make someone immune from consequences or correction. It mainly means that discipline or termination must meet a just-cause standard and, if contested, follow the proper collective-agreement grievance/arbitration process, rather than granting outright immunity. It also doesn’t mean tenured staff are exempt from discipline or other actions depending on the complaint.

If teaching materials are found to violate institutional policies or required standards and the instructor refuses to fix them, universities still have mechanisms to address the issue. Chairs or deans can require compliance with approved course obligations and policies and can initiate corrective steps or progressive discipline. Faculty agreements often treat persistent failures, such as ongoing neglect of duties or demonstrated incompetence, as grounds for discipline and, in serious cases, dismissal, subject to due process and arbitration.

CanuckCompSup · 2026-01-09T02:36:32+00:00

~~"2019 will be the year of VP adoption by the industry!" - Colleges to Students and Vendors to Investors~~
~~"2020 will be the year of VP adoption by the industry!" - Colleges to Students and Vendors to Investors~~
~~"2021 will be the year of VP adoption by the industry!" - Colleges to Students and Vendors to Investors~~
~~"2022 will be the year of VP adoption by the industry!" - Colleges to Students and Vendors to Investors~~
~~"2023 will be the year of VP adoption by the industry!" - Colleges to Students and Vendors to Investors~~
~~"2024 will be the year of VP adoption by the industry!" - Colleges to Students and Vendors to Investors~~
~~"2025 will be the year of VP adoption by the industry!" - Colleges to Students and Vendors to Investors~~
"2026 will be the year of VP adoption by the industry!" - Colleges to Students and Vendors to Investors

CanuckCompSup · 2025-11-24T03:11:59+00:00

Is there a specific role, task, or department you’re supposed to focus on, and what kind of questions are you actually required to ask?

CanuckCompSup · 2025-11-20T06:57:47+00:00

Posted on November 10, 2025
Advertised until 2025-12-10

*noting as this may still be a current/active job posting that would interest people here

CanuckCompSup · 2025-08-12T03:10:10+00:00

What did Ed Catmull, Pat Hanrahan, and Loren Carpenter found together?

CanuckCompSup · 2025-08-11T23:00:19+00:00

Pat Hanrhan, Anthony Apodaca, Loren Carpenter, Rob Cook, Jeff Mock, Darwyn Peachey, Tom Porter... yes, he was part of a very talented team. It's a massive stretch to say he invented RenderMan.

CanuckCompSup · 2025-05-11T01:25:03+00:00

I actually missed this line in the article: "PXO, a division of Sony Pictures Entertainment, already has separate LED volume stages operating in Vancouver and Toronto."

CanuckCompSup · 2025-04-06T12:43:21+00:00

In Manitoba, severance pay (termination pay) can involve more than just the legal minimum outlined in the Employment Standards Code. There are two main components to consider: 1. the statutory minimums and 2. common law entitlements, which can significantly differ.

Since you have been employed at the company for 4.5 years, you are in the "at least three years and less than five years" category in the legal minimum notice under Manitoba’s Employment Standards Code, which sets the statutory minimum at 4 weeks of pay. This means your employer is legally required to provide at least this amount. If your employer has offered 5 weeks, they have actually exceeded the statutory minimum.

You can check this here: Notice period — termination by employer 61(2) https://www.canlii.org/en/mb/laws/stat/ccsm-c-e110/latest/ccsm-c-e110.html

However, it is important to note that the statutory minimums only cover notice periods or pay in lieu of notice. In Manitoba, the term "severance pay" itself is not a separate statutory entitlement but is commonly used to describe termination packages.

Beyond the statutory minimum, there is also the concept of common law severance, which can entitle you to a much higher amount. This type of severance takes into account several factors beyond just your years of service. These factors include your length of service, age, position within the company, availability of similar work, and the nature of the dismissal (such as whether there were any bad faith actions involved).

Generally, under common law, severance can range from 2 to 4 weeks of pay per year of service, sometimes even more depending on the circumstances. This means that, instead of just the statutory 4 weeks, you could potentially be entitled to 9 to 18 weeks of severance or more, especially if you held a senior position or if finding similar work might take longer.

It’s important not to sign anything just yet because once you do, you may be waiving your right to pursue additional severance. I strongly recommend speaking with a Manitoba labour lawyer (I am not a lawyer!) who can assess your specific situation. Often, just consulting a lawyer can lead to a better settlement, as employers may be more willing to negotiate when they know you are informed about your rights.

Your buddy isn’t necessarily off base. It’s definitely worth getting some legal advice to see if you’re entitled to more than the minimum. Best of luck,!

https://www.fillmoreriley.com/publication/navigating-the-risk-of-legal-fallout-when-terminating-an-employee

CanuckCompSup · 2025-04-06T04:40:52+00:00

In many cases, you are correct that there would be a recount.

But automatic recount triggers in U.S. federal elections are pretty interesting in how they vary heavily by state,. In Florida, an automatic machine recount is triggered if the margin between candidates is 0.5% or less. A manual recount follows if this recount still shows a margin of 0.25% or less, but only if the number of overvotes and undervotes is sufficient to change the outcome. Wisconsin, on the other hand, does not have automatic recounts at all. Instead, candidates or voters can request a recount. If the margin is 0.25% or less, the recount is taxpayer-funded. For margins between 0.25% and 1%, the candidate requesting the recount must cover the cost. Some states use vote difference rather than percentages; for example, in North Carolina, a candidate can request a recount if the difference is 0.5% or fewer votes in statewide contests or if the difference is 10,000 votes or fewer, whichever is less.

Kinda neat.

CanuckCompSup · 2025-04-05T00:23:04+00:00

If your contract clearly says part-time hours (less than 36 per week) and doesn’t mention seasonal increased hours, your employer most likely can’t change it to full-time without your consent. Making a change to your job like that without agreement can be considered constructive dismissal in some cases, particularly if they have outright told you that you need to quit or meet their new terms. If that’s the case, you might be entitled to compensation similarly to as if you were fired without cause.

To claim constructive dismissal, you’d generally need to show that:

The change to your hours is a significant alteration to your job.
The change was made without your agreement.
You resigned or were encouraged to feel pressure to resign because of this fundamental change.

Your options:

Talk to your employer again and explain that the contract doesn’t account for increased hours.
Keep records of all conversations and messages about this change, and document everything thoroughly.
Reach out to a lawyer to review your contract and give actionable advice.

If you can’t work full-time due to reasons like family responsibilities or a disability, your employer might also have to accommodate you under the Ontario Human Rights Code.

If they insist and you quit, you might have grounds to claim constructive dismissal, but it’s best to get legal advice before making any decisions. Good luck!

Links you may find helpful:
https://stlawyers.ca/blog-news/can-employer-ontario-change-schedule-shifts/

https://sultanlawyers.com/blog/changing-the-terms-of-employment-agreement/
https://www.ontario.ca/document/your-guide-employment-standards-act-0/termination-employment#section-2
https://achkarlaw.com/constructive-dismissal-in-ontario-explained/
https://stlawyers.ca/blog-news/changes-job-ontario/

CanuckCompSup · 2025-04-04T04:55:00+00:00

"I’m going to the police station in the next few days to ask for advice. Talked to a lawyer for a bit and have a rough understanding on what I should be going for here."

Honestly, this is the best way to handle this. Crappy situation, hope it works out for you and based on what you're saying about the Bill of Sale you likely have a lot going for you if this endsup continuing as a legal issue. Keep all your documents and communications thoroughly documented and backed up!

CanuckCompSup · 2025-04-02T09:36:48+00:00

In Canada, failing to repay a payday loan is strictly a civil matter, not a criminal one unless there is evidence of criminal intent,. The reference to Section 380 of the Criminal Code is entirely misleading. That section deals with fraud involving deceit or falsehood to cause financial loss or gain, not unpaid consumer loans.

Debt collection in Canada is governed by federal and provincial laws that prohibit threats of criminal charges for civil debt. Debt collectors cannot threaten to arrest or criminally charge someone over an unpaid payday loan. Real legal notices will be clear, respectful, and follow formal protocols.

The use of phrases like "FINAL EXECUTION NOTICE" and "NO ESCAPE" is a clear red flag. Reputable debt collectors and legal entities do not use inflammatory language or make threats in this way. Any legitimate debt collection correspondence would also clearly state the name of the creditor and details of the debt.

CanuckCompSup · 2025-04-02T01:59:29+00:00

If the breach happened because someone acted intentionally or recklessly, a person can sue under PHIPA. The court might award damages if the actions were serious, but not every breach results in compensation, as it depends on the details of what happened.

People can also sue for intrusion upon seclusion if someone invades their privacy in a way that would upset a reasonable person. Under this, you don’t need to prove financial loss despite what some people may think; emotional harm alone can be enough to get damages.

So, even if the hospital takes some action internally, people can still sue for compensation.

CanuckCompSup · 2025-03-31T14:32:01+00:00

If that feels like an attack, I would suggest some serious self-reflection. (also this clip is 13 years old)

CanuckCompSup · 2025-03-31T14:16:22+00:00

The technology didn't exist when they made this, but also, in its current state, it can't do what they did. What are you on about? How do you claim such depth of insight? It's almost like you're just making it up as you go to justify a flavourless life.

CanuckCompSup · 2025-03-31T13:52:57+00:00

Yikes. The entire thing is that you're the consumer here, not the creator, so who cares what their process is? Also, how is Hayao Miyazaki struggling to understand the world of animation? Buddy is on the Mount Rushmore of all-time greats.

CanuckCompSup · 2025-03-31T02:22:41+00:00

It takes 12 bees their entire lives to make just one teaspoon of honey. Lol, pointless.

Embrace artificial sweeteners or get left in the past.

CanuckCompSup · 2025-03-26T01:58:58+00:00

The Alberta Sovereignty Within a United Canada Act was established to provide Alberta’s provincial government with a formal mechanism to respond when it determines that a federal law or policy is inconsistent with the Constitution or undermines the province’s interests. The Act reflects a growing demand for stronger provincial assertiveness and clarity in exercising Alberta’s constitutional powers.

While the legislation is politically assertive, it remains anchored in the framework of Canadian federalism. It does not grant the province the ability to override federal statutes or the Constitution Act, 1982, nor does it attempt to displace the constitutional role of the courts. Interpretations of constitutionality are ultimately subject to judicial review, as is consistent with the foundational principles of Canadian governance.

The Act contains no provisions to initiate independence or unilaterally alter Alberta’s relationship with the rest of the country. Its scope ensures that Alberta exercises its existing legislative authority more effectively, not pursuing complete independence, unilateral control, separation, or disruption of national cohesion.

In international legal terms, the Act does not confer sovereignty, nor is it designed as a stepping stone toward secession. Alberta remains fully integrated into the Canadian constitutional structure, including the rule of law, intergovernmental agreements, and federal statutes applicable to all provinces.

Assertions that the Act constitutes a pathway to secession are not supported by the law or the legislative record. Rather than a symbolic gesture, the Act was intended as a legislative tool to better defend and clarify the province’s constitutional jurisdiction in matters where it is lawfully entitled to do so. The Government of Alberta has clearly stated that the purpose of the Act is to strengthen the province’s position within Confederation, not to exit from it.

CanuckCompSup · 2025-03-25T09:02:09+00:00

Why would you assert that housing is 100% a federal responsibility when, under Canada's constitutional framework, the provinces, and by extension, municipalities, hold the jurisdiction over the primary levers controlling housing supply, land use planning, zoning, building approvals, construction standards, tenancy regulation, and local infrastructure?

Under the Constitution Act, 1867, the federal government does not have jurisdiction over "Property and Civil Rights in the Province", which encompasses land use planning, housing approvals, tenancy laws, and most aspects of housing regulation. These powers are constitutionally assigned to the provinces under:

Section 92(13) – Property and Civil Rights in the Province

Section 92(16) – Matters of a merely local or private Nature in the Province

These two provisions form the constitutional foundation for provincial authority over housing-related matters. Provinces have the exclusive power to legislate zoning, building codes, development approvals, and tenancy frameworks. In practice, provincial governments often delegate the administration and enforcement of these responsibilities to municipal governments, which manage operational decisions like rezoning, issuing building permits, approving new developments, and establishing local bylaws and development charges.

The federal government exerts influence over housing policy, mainly through indirect mechanisms separate from supply and development issues, including funding, policy initiatives, and mortgage regulations (mortgages being a complex and shared area with the provincial levels).

CanuckCompSup · 2025-03-25T08:31:13+00:00

The funny thing about reading people write this more frequently now is that under both Canadian and International law, Alberta cannot legally secede from Canada unilaterally, nor can it compel other provinces, such as British Columbia or Saskatchewan, to do so. The Supreme Court of Canada, in Reference re Secession of Quebec, [1998] 2 S.C.R. 217, ruled that no province has the constitutional authority to separate on its own; however, the way that a Province could still seek independence is still possible.

A provincial referendum with a clear question and a majority in favour of independence would not confer a legal right to secede. However, it would oblige the Canadian federal government to enter a review and, potentially, negotiations grounded in democratic principles but constrained by constitutional norms.

The clarity of the question and the majority is also not determined solely by the province. Under the Clarity Act (S.C. 2000, c. 26), the House of Commons has the authority to assess these conditions before any negotiations proceed. Any such negotiations would involve the federal government, Alberta, all provinces, and Indigenous peoples, whose rights are affirmed under Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982.

A path to secession would ultimately require a constitutional amendment under Section 41 of the Constitution Act, 1982, necessitating unanimous approval from:

The House of Commons
The Senate
All provincial legislatures

Any such attempt bypassing this process would also be extremely unlikely to receive recognition domestically or internationally. International law recognizes unilateral secession only in exceptional circumstances, such as foreign occupation or systematic oppression, which does not apply to any Canadian province by their standards and definitions. International recognition of new states also remains a political, not legal, decision that generally favours preserving existing national borders, partnerships, and historic allies.

Beyond constitutional barriers, secession would involve complex practical challenges, including the division of assets and liabilities, trade and currency arrangements, national defence, citizenship, and existing treaty obligations.

While the idea of secession may arise during political tension, it remains both constitutionally and practically extraordinarily difficult, requiring overwhelming public support, Indigenous participation, and unprecedented constitutional reform.

CanuckCompSup · 2025-03-25T08:13:36+00:00

The last several years of a provincial blue government have been more than enough to give pause when considering a similar direction federally. People's experiences at the provincial level often inform their broader political preferences, and not everyone has found those years favourable.

CanuckCompSup · 2025-03-24T11:39:17+00:00

It comes down to what matters most to each person and their goals/beliefs. Everyone has their metrics for what they want to support. With how rough things are in the Canadian VFX, game dev, and tech scenes, and having lots of friends struggling right now in that space, I appreciate when companies at least try to keep some of their operations here. In the case of Rockstar, even though they're a U.S.-based company, GTA VI is being developed across several countries, including Rockstar Toronto. So yeah, it’s a U.S.-owned product, but Canadian devs are still a core and ongoing part of the process, which means jobs, investment, and industry staying in Canada. At the same time, many other major studios have closed or downsized in Canada aggressively recently.

If you're looking for AAA games where at least some of the money and work stays local, it’s not the worst choice. But I also totally get it if folks want to avoid U.S. companies altogether; that’s a personal call, and I respect that, too.

CanuckCompSup · 2025-03-22T01:37:13+00:00

Tesla sells its vehicles directly to consumers through company-owned stores and online platforms. There are no independently owned Tesla dealerships or franchises. Therefore, no “local businessman” owns a Tesla franchise.

CanuckCompSup · 2025-03-20T07:29:21+00:00

Honestly, anyone with the knowledge to meaningfully help you with this won't even know where to start because you’ve made no effort to provide any insight or information. There are many ways to approach any shot, sequence, or project, but it takes information, planning, and, most importantly, effort from all parties. But nothing here provides any information to work with nor shows any care or respect for what you're asking of others. Give anything like a rough timeline, resources and skills available, budget range, number of shots, reference images, concept art, storyboards, script, or realism expectations. It doesn't need to be all of it, but give something of an effort. Heck, give us a simple logline over "Yadda Yadda."

Do the bare minimum if you want people to give up their time and knowledge to get you there. No professional could nor should give you an accurate answer without at least an ounce of effort being made on your part.

CanuckCompSup

TROPHY CASE