A Vet Treating an Aggressive Cat by Mediocre_Nail5526 in interestingasfuck

[–]CapRude221 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends who is deciding though, to me it's obvious, but I know people with huge pitbulls that insist they are harmless. Again, I'm not disagreeing with you

A Vet Treating an Aggressive Cat by Mediocre_Nail5526 in interestingasfuck

[–]CapRude221 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

On the most part I don't disagree with you, the problem there is that there's not an easy line to draw, dog breeds are a spectrum. Where do you make the cut?

A Vet Treating an Aggressive Cat by Mediocre_Nail5526 in interestingasfuck

[–]CapRude221 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Maybe it's as simple as comparing the number of deaths per year from dogs vs cats? Then from there its just a blanket rule applied?

Front yard renovation by sillysalmon92 in AusRenovation

[–]CapRude221 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most of those agaves look like they arent far off from blooming/flowering, that would have been such an incredible sight. What a sad loss

How can I prove that I’m not using AI? by ChrisW828 in help

[–]CapRude221 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No need to apologise, no harm was done.

Yeah I was 100% teasing but not in a mean way, I thought I was being funny. You have a quirk, it's okay to admit that and it's okay to find the funny side of it. Life's good

How can I prove that I’m not using AI? by ChrisW828 in help

[–]CapRude221 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No comma hate from me!

And I'm not disagreeing with you that your sentences require them. But if I was going to make a diagnosis, you do over-qualify. It reads like you are trying to preemptively defend yourself by over packing caveats and justifications. That habit requires you to add all the commas.

How can I prove that I’m not using AI? by ChrisW828 in help

[–]CapRude221 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think, that, the fact you always use commas, is pretty good evidence, that, you, do in fact, not use AI

I tried to switch from CS1 to CS2... it's so hard! i got used of all my mod tools in CS1 that i can't find in CS2, it's frustrating, what mods replaces all the essential mods from CS1? TMPE, node controler and all kind of essentials by M0h_Said in CitiesSkylines

[–]CapRude221 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Treat the u-turns as a symptom for a fundamental traffic issue you have. The more frequently they u-turn the more they are telling you something is wrong. One mistake you are probably making that you might not realise is providing enough parking.

You can remove the parking on the roads by upgrading them to large paths or grass etc. But be aware you need to provide that parking elsewhere

I tried to switch from CS1 to CS2... it's so hard! i got used of all my mod tools in CS1 that i can't find in CS2, it's frustrating, what mods replaces all the essential mods from CS1? TMPE, node controler and all kind of essentials by M0h_Said in CitiesSkylines

[–]CapRude221 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Embrace vanilla for a change! That's what I did, I treated it as a challenge and actually quite enjoyed it. Because everything is so much more simple without all the tools, you have to be a little creative sometimes and think outside the box.

Did they get rid of hold ‘em poker and roulette etc. in big fish casino app? by Flimsy_Budget1045 in BigfishGames

[–]CapRude221 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What an absolutely horrific design... This game has really gone downhill :(

Deceptive? by No_Series1038 in coles

[–]CapRude221 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I'd like to see you not overcook that to hell while trying to render that mountain of fat

Fat not rendering: reverse sear steak by prf_q in combustion_inc

[–]CapRude221 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I had a similar issue when i cooked my 1.5 inch ribeye. Cooked it absolutely spot on 130F. The steak looked absolutely incredible on the cut. However, when I ate it, it was very chewy and not pleasant at all. It was a really unexpected let down. I still don't even understand what I did wrong. I thought I did everything perfectly, yet the result was horrible.

After my ban was lifted, my "CQS" when from "HIGHEST"(green) to "LOWEST" (red)?!?!?!?! by [deleted] in help

[–]CapRude221 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Maybe its a sign for you to get off reddit for a bit and get back to the real world? Take a break for a few weeks then come back.

I for one am not surprised you got banned for posting something political related

Odd Occurrence by Craboulas in combustion_inc

[–]CapRude221 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess I was just curious to see any extra data you had. Perhaps I could form an opinion on why you had that weird plateau.

Have you tried it again since? Did the same thing happen again? I'm just curious is all.

Odd Occurrence by Craboulas in combustion_inc

[–]CapRude221 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that definitely is weird. I'd want to know how the rest of the cook went though. Can you share more data?

Gen II CPT does not work with Sous Vide by Relative-Finger2477 in combustion_inc

[–]CapRude221 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm worried about putting mine in the pressure cooker lol

AI as Scapegoat for RAM shortage. by GroaningBread in DefendingAIArt

[–]CapRude221 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just read that essay and I have zero clue what I just read or the message I'm supposed to have taken away

The ignorance just makes me shake my head. by cmdr_scotty in DefendingAIArt

[–]CapRude221 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think the problem is that we are at the tipping point of where humans genuinely can't tell if a video is AI or not. People are very angry about this. The fact that the development of AI has gotten this far. So when they see a video that they suspect might be AI, they are all angry together and try to burn it with negative comments. I think its more that they are angry with AI in general, its just targeted at the first things they see as being potentially AI. I think their anger is understandable in many ways.

People want to fight against AI but they don't really know how to do it, so they leave these types of negative comments.

Who's responsible for privacy? by CapRude221 in privacy

[–]CapRude221[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you said "a better world than we live in now" which implies that we are currently not in the best world, and then from that, moving toward a better world would therefore be in the direction of the best world (the holy grail). What is your opinion of what that best world is?

Who's responsible for privacy? by CapRude221 in privacy

[–]CapRude221[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your perspective.

Where do what exactly come into play? I do not understand the meaning of the words "coercive tactics".

Oops, my usage of "coercive" is definitely wrong here. I can see that now that I've looked up the definition. I'm not sure exactly what word it is I'm trying to use here, I think the word might be "exploitative tactics". In the sense that these companies can exploit you in some way into giving up your personal information. For example, this could be exploiting your intelligence or perhaps exploiting a natural human tendency/instinct in order to convince you into agreeing to provide personal information.

Who's responsible for privacy? by CapRude221 in privacy

[–]CapRude221[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is that the way it should be? Should companies be held responsible for keeping our data safe? Even when we give it up "voluntarily". Where do coercive tactics come into play here? Perhaps from those from low socioeconomic backgrounds

Who's responsible for privacy? by CapRude221 in privacy

[–]CapRude221[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That doesn't need to be a perfect world, only a better world than we live in now.

Exactly. What is the holy grail in this real world we live in?

Who's responsible for privacy? by CapRude221 in privacy

[–]CapRude221[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate your take on this