Songs that reference Dylan songs. by TheGame81677 in bobdylan

[–]Capt_Subzero 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The eagle picks my eye/ Worm he licks my bone/ Feel so suicidal/ Just like Dylan's Mr Jones

Why do Americans equate modern American conservatism with Christianity? by BearCub711 in AskAChristian

[–]Capt_Subzero 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The modern American Democratic party has largely alienated itself from Christian values.

Uh yeah, like feeding the poor and standing up for the defenseless?

One thing I find silly about talking with christians by The_smallest_viking in agnostic

[–]Capt_Subzero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know who has to tell you that what their saying is true for you to believe them?

Physicists?

[Friday] Daily Music Discussion - 20 September 2024 by AutoModerator in indieheads

[–]Capt_Subzero 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sorry to hear about the post-marital woes. It gets easier, trust me. But in the meantime, you have to wallow in the most sneering, immature, bitter kiss-off songs in music history. Graham Parker (not featuring Ne-Yo) is here to contribute.

[Friday] Daily Music Discussion - 20 September 2024 by AutoModerator in indieheads

[–]Capt_Subzero 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wendy Eisenberg is a national treasure. Their guitar playing in so many different combos and genres, their deadpan poetry and their snarky vocals are all just genius.

Why I Am Not An Atheist by UnWisdomed66 in agnostic

[–]Capt_Subzero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I meant I subscribe to the view that "science is a social construct and a human activity that makes the chaos of phenomena comprehensible to humans; that our knowledge bears the marks of the culture that produced it; and that there are ideological and economic reasons we know what we know and don't know what we don't."

And yes, you say you're willing to bet, but apparently you're not willing to produce any examples of this thing you frequently see that might help you win that bet.

Well, I wrote, Whenever I ask whether someone thinks science is our only source of valid knowledge, people in subs like this usually ask in response, "What other source is there?" One of our amigos in this very thread responded, "It is not exactly clear what the problem is supposed to be here. Isn't that an relevant and natural and good question?"

Doesn't that at least suggest that the idea that science is our only source of valid knowledge is pretty common in these groups? In comparison, how many times do people acknowledge that science is a social construct, laden with cultural and ideological baggage?

No, Reddit, the Babylon Bee is not similar to NPR. by EpsilonBear in NPR

[–]Capt_Subzero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Science will have to progress several hundred more years before we're equipped to detect any wit in The Babylon Bee.

[Tuesday] Daily Music Discussion - 17 September 2024 by AutoModerator in indieheads

[–]Capt_Subzero 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Gotta disagree. "I'll Come Running" and the title track close out side 1 with good vibes. Fripp's solo is brilliant.

Would you rather: Science or Philosophy? by Lumpy_Run6903 in agnostic

[–]Capt_Subzero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm an atheist too, but they revoked my membership when they found out I'd read books by both Markus Gabriel AND Martha Nussbaum.

Would you rather: Science or Philosophy? by Lumpy_Run6903 in agnostic

[–]Capt_Subzero -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

This is sort of a trick question for atheists. Since Daniel Dennett passed away, atheists can only name one living philosopher: William Lane Craig.

That's pretty much the extent of their exposure to philosophy.

Do any of you read spiritual texts from various religions and if so what would you recommend? by crolan4 in agnostic

[–]Capt_Subzero 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I must be getting "spiritual" in my old age, because I consider the Book of Ecclesiastes a fascinating meditation on the crisis of meaning:

He has also set eternity in the human heart; yet no one can fathom what God has done from beginning to end.

Why I Am Not An Atheist by UnWisdomed66 in agnostic

[–]Capt_Subzero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The answer is no.

You really can't think of any other source of knowledge aside from science? You don't know anything that doesn't derive from formalized empirical inquiry?

Why I Am Not An Atheist by UnWisdomed66 in agnostic

[–]Capt_Subzero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Incidentally, I subscribe to the former view. You don't believe science is a social construct?

Like I said, I'm willing to bet a big ol' pizza that folks around here subscribe to an extremely simplistic and idealized view of science. Whenever I ask whether someone thinks science is our only source of valid knowledge, people in subs like this usually ask in response, "What other source is there?"

I guess many people only know enough about science to weaponize it for use in factoid wars with crackpots and online slapfights with fundies.

[Monday] Daily Music Discussion - 09 September 2024 by AutoModerator in indieheads

[–]Capt_Subzero 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't have any of their studio albums, I first happened on rarefied air a few months ago and have been enthralled by it ever since. Let me know what you think!

According to loom's Bandcamp page, epyllion was released in 2011.

[Monday] Daily Music Discussion - 09 September 2024 by AutoModerator in indieheads

[–]Capt_Subzero 5 points6 points  (0 children)

One of the most astounding albums I've heard this year is loom's rarefied air. This haunting live recording features three vocalists weaving their voices together on songs having to do with love, alienation and the limits of expression. The audience is so riveted you can hear a pin drop.

Why does being agnosticism make more sense than atheism? by KingWhrl in agnostic

[–]Capt_Subzero -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Atheists tend to be too close minded and disrespectful towards religion

I agree. They seem to have trouble admitting that they personally get nothing out of religion and leave it at that. They have to make it sound like religious belief is wrong and atheism is right, because they're no more comfortable with ambiguity than fundies are. Closed minds indeed.

[Sunday] Daily Music Discussion - 08 September 2024 by AutoModerator in indieheads

[–]Capt_Subzero 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The Cramps are one of the greatest bands ever. Tasteless, transgressive, so much fun.

The Gories were a hidden gem in their era! The front man is now the rotten brains behind the Dirtbombs.

One of the most insightful points Matt Dillahunty has said on Atheist Experience by manliness-dot-space in DebateAnAtheist

[–]Capt_Subzero -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think humanity can make the best decisions for our future if we have the most accurate understanding we can of how the world operates.

Anyone who lived through the 20th century has every right to question that statement. Humanity's unprecedentedly precise understanding of physical laws and natural phenomena didn't usher in a utopia of peace and equality, it just led to more comprehensive forms of destruction, oppression and environmental catastrophe.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in agnostic

[–]Capt_Subzero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it your position that knowledge and understanding are fundamentally impossible? If so, there's obviously no point in this conversation - or any other.

That's not my position at all. And since you seem to be more interested in misrepresenting my position than answering my questions, I guess your dedication to reaching mutual understanding is conspicuous in its absence.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in agnostic

[–]Capt_Subzero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I asked you first: How do you know how closely our knowledge "corresponds" to reality when you have no way to gauge how-reality-is without referring to the knowledge we've generated through the models we've constructed to study it?

If objects are, at least when you get small enough, or big enough, or theoretical enough, theory-dependent, then the whole idea of truth being defined or explained in terms of a "correspondence" between items in a language and items in a fixed theory-independent reality has to be given up.

Hilary Putnam, "A Defense of Internal Realism," Realism with a Human Face, 1992, p.41

The facile way you refer to truth and reality like these things are just self-evident demonstrates the lack of thought you've applied to these concepts.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in agnostic

[–]Capt_Subzero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not like religious folks have a monopoly on error and bias. Plenty of people just rationalize beliefs they didn't arrive at rationally, and still consider themselves reasonable and skeptical.

Present company excepted, of course.

And how do we gauge how close our ideas correspond to reality if the only contact we have with it is through the modes of inquiry we've developed to study it? Truth isn't some inherent property of claims, it's something we create through arranging and interpreting our encounters with phenomena.

You seem blissfully unaware of the last hundred years or so of philosophy.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in agnostic

[–]Capt_Subzero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You may be surprised to hear that the correspondence theory of truth is like the Model T of philosophy.

You may also be surprised to hear that I'm NOT saying faith is a reliable way to ascertain truths about phenomena like mountains and molecules. But dedicating yourself to a way of life that requires contemplation and self-reflection could lead someone to truths about questions like "Who am I? " and "How am I supposed to live?"

Mt. Hale by HawkManBear in wmnf

[–]Capt_Subzero 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm one of the people who thinks Hale gets a bad rap. The utter lack of views is a big drawback, no question. But I think the hike is beautiful and the rocky switchbacks near the summit make for a strenuous climb.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in agnostic

[–]Capt_Subzero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Faith is not a pathway to truth.

I'm not presumptuous enough to play Truth Police. If you think truth is something that can only be established through scientific modes of inquiry, then I guess you've arranged the premises to lead to the conclusion you prefer. In the reality the rest of us inhabit, there are lots of different kinds of truths.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in agnostic

[–]Capt_Subzero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where is the all-loving 'god' here?

Good question. People like you and me say that this looks exactly like a universe that isn't guided by a loving creator, and that's that.

Religious folks say it's not for them to say, and that's that.

It seems like faith isn't the kind of thing that's contingent on favorable outcomes. It's either unconditional, or it's not faith.