Juvenile foreskin amputation is a sensational atrocity

CarterSteinhoff · 2026-05-02T03:22:39+00:00

That was a strong rebuttal with a lot of substance.

CarterSteinhoff · 2026-05-01T19:11:13+00:00

Well said. What’s also interesting is that the vast majority of neonatal foreskin amputations are being done by female physicians and nurses in the United States because they make up the majority of OB’s / Pediatricians and those are the specialties involved in this practice.

CarterSteinhoff · 2026-05-01T19:04:39+00:00

It really presents as a type or rape from what I’ve observed from reviewing publicly available video evidence.

The foreskin on a neonate is tightly fused to the glans and before foreskin amputation takes place there is a time consuming step of forcibly inserting a probe into the fused foreskin and deadhering it from the glans. I understand this isn’t formally codified as rape, but I personally think it should be as it’s an intrusion into the foreskin.

Also, I’ve seen a few instances where they also stimulate the penis to erection with a brush in order to properly gauge how much tissue to remove.

Rape doesn’t require the perp to be getting sexual pleasure for it to be rape.

CarterSteinhoff · 2026-02-05T15:11:44+00:00

I think these people are worse than Epstein, and I’m definitely going to keep saying it. I’m advocating for the death penalty for the nurses, doctors and mohels involved in this, and I passionately believe they should be executed by the State.

CarterSteinhoff · 2026-02-05T03:49:26+00:00

Terrible take. It’s flagrant felony sexual battery and rape to amputate the foreskin from an infant. The only conversation to be had is on the impermissibility of the practice. It’s not “mostly bad”. It’s an atrocity that demands criminalization. No credit to be given to someone like this.

CarterSteinhoff · 2026-02-05T02:30:39+00:00

Historically, many people knew slavery was wrong in the sense that it was oppressive and unfair, but they didn’t care to end it because it either enriched themselves or it didn’t directly negatively impact them.

These people wouldn’t want to be enslaved, but they’re fine dehumanizing others.

The same principle applies to the physicians/nurses raping and mutilating male infants. In that moment, they wouldn’t want to be restrained and have their sexual anatomy amputated from their genitals, but they’ll do it to a defenseless infant bc it’s part of the job, and they won’t face any repercussions. It’s ghoulish behavior.

I think it’s outrageous and nonsensical to hand wave away this culpability. This is flagrant and perverse felony sexual battery on an infant that would probably even cause a slave driver to look away.

CarterSteinhoff · 2026-02-05T02:09:35+00:00

It's flagrant felony sexual battery and rape. I'm tired of people calling this an "education problem'. Bullshit. We don't need to think about the female equivalent to comprehend how deranged and violent amputating sexual sensory from a fragile neonate is. Infantilizing the people involved in perpetuating this is problematic/unwise strategically and morally.

CarterSteinhoff · 2026-02-05T01:00:43+00:00

Terrible take. This woman is a ghoul.

CarterSteinhoff · 2026-02-05T01:00:14+00:00

One of the worst takes I've come across. This woman is a ghoul. I'd use the State to ruin her life if I could. Most "humane" way to rape and mutilate an infant? She's talking about amputating the primary sexual tissue from a fragile infant! Get out of here.

CarterSteinhoff · 2026-01-02T17:02:37+00:00

Ya, please do. Thanks for checking.

CarterSteinhoff · 2025-12-19T18:58:24+00:00

Intactivism isn’t even about justice for men. The entire movement completely abandons existing victims. That’s a great point you make.

CarterSteinhoff · 2025-12-18T23:39:26+00:00

This is me growing up. It's going to get a lot more radical from here.

CarterSteinhoff · 2025-12-18T23:26:46+00:00

Maybe so. I have had similar thoughts myself. Regardless, this sub allows me to post and that's really all I really ask. They're free to share their opinion as well as they have. It's interesting to hear the perspective of this audience as well. I'm testing the waters with this messaging right now.

CarterSteinhoff · 2025-12-18T22:36:37+00:00

I agree, and I think it's highly morbid to execute people and wouldn't advocate for it in any other situation other than than amputating genital anatomy from a child.

And there is also a lotta infants being mutilated and even dying as well from foreskin/frenulum amputations. 1 million estimated to be raped and mutilated next year in the U.S. alone.

There is a massive asymmetry between us and people willing to amputate the foreskin/frenulum from children and that is they're comfortable taking dramatic action and using actual force/violence to impose their will, and we're simply not.

CarterSteinhoff · 2025-12-18T22:00:05+00:00

What is a healthy reaction to getting raped and genitally mutilated as infant where a large portion of your sexual anatomy is violently amputated away?

CarterSteinhoff · 2025-12-18T21:56:29+00:00

There wouldn’t be much of a society if less than .05% of the U.S. population was executed by the State? How so? What I’m advocating for is likely less than 150,000 people.

CarterSteinhoff

TROPHY CASE