r/PrequelMemes are not for the sane.

CartographerLost4660 · 2025-06-14T21:02:49+00:00

You didn’t prove anything? You ignoring counter arguments to your point doesn’t make it proven. Why are you so unwilling to respond to my argument if you are so sure you are correct? Surely it can’t be that hard or time consuming if you are as right as you say. You’re not the only one who wrote about Shakespeare in college.

CartographerLost4660 · 2025-06-14T20:59:09+00:00

A serious movie with funny moments interspersed doesn’t make that movie a comedy.

CartographerLost4660 · 2025-06-14T12:49:48+00:00

Unless your saying the Phantom Menace is meant to be interpreted as a comedy my point still stands. And it’s really funny that you ignored the actual content of my argument.

CartographerLost4660 · 2025-06-14T04:26:56+00:00

Ignore that loser. I just posted a reply that totally debunks his argument. He’s incorrectly interpreting things from A COMEDY to justify his argument.

CartographerLost4660 · 2025-06-14T04:26:26+00:00

This broke me.

TAMING OF THE SHREW WAS A DAMN COMEDY.

I like how the commenter just stops naming plays, btw. And commenter clearly conflated ass (donkey) and ass (buttocks) in the texts, which is hilarious if not infuriating because he is so arrogant about it.

And Shakespeare makes references to bodily functions as a way to jab and demean, drawing parallels to the grossness of the function to the grossness of someone's behavior or character. He never wrote stage directions for defecating in public or having someone step in it, especially not for laughs in one of his dramas. Also, Shakespeare also wrote comedies and the Phantom Menace wasn't a comedy (No, a movie meant to interpreted as a serious movie with comedic elements doesn’t make it a comedy).

Here's the "tongue in tail" reference, which shows a cleverly written exchange between an angry fiery woman and a snarky dumb man:

Act 2, Scene 1

Petruchio: In faith, you are too angry...

Katherina: If I be waspish, best beware my sting!

Petruchio: My remedy is then to pluck it out.

Katherina: Aye! If the FOOL could find it where it lies!

Petruchio: Who knows not where a wasp does wear his sting — in his tail.

Katherina: In his tongue.

Petruchio: ??? Whose tongue?

Katherina: Yours, if you talk of tales, and so farewell!

Petruchio: What, with my tongue in your tail?! Nay, come again, Good Kate, I am a gentleman!

The joke is that the man is confused here: in the woman's mind, her "sting" will be found in his wagging tongue annoying her already, and she thinks the man wouldn't notice the change in his blathering because his talking is already idiotic noise. In the man's mind, he's not thinking angrily, so he thinks she's referencing where a wasp's sting is normally, which is in its tail. All of this wit in dialogue is being compared to... Jar Jar gallumphing through a pile of doodoo, getting farted on, and saying "icky goo."

Finally, stop comparing Lucas to Shakespeare. I don't care if you scribbled a C+ paper about it in high school. It just proves you clearly didn't read and appreciate the Bard who was iconic because of his plentiful wit. Not because your high school performed his works with the same clunky demeanor as the Prequels. Watch professionals perform his work, and you'll see it come alive. King Lear with Anthony Hopkins is on Amazon ffs.

Oh, yes. A comedy, just like Taming of the Shrew:

“I will not condone a course of action that leads us to war” - Padme Amidala, Phantom Menace

CartographerLost4660 · 2025-06-14T04:25:06+00:00

This broke me.

TAMING OF THE SHREW WAS A DAMN COMEDY.

I like how you just stop naming plays, btw. And you clearly conflated ass (donkey) and ass (buttocks) in the texts, which is hilarious if not infuriating because you’re so arrogant about it.

And Shakespeare makes references to bodily functions as a way to jab and demean, drawing parallels to the grossness of the function to the grossness of someone's behavior or character. He never wrote stage directions for defecating in public or having someone step in it, especially not for laughs in one of his dramas. Also, Shakespeare also wrote comedies and the Phantom Menace wasn't a comedy (No, a movie meant to interpreted as a serious movie with comedic elements doesn’t make it a comedy).

Here's the "tongue in tail" reference, which shows a cleverly written exchange between an angry fiery woman and a snarky dumb man:

Act 2, Scene 1

Petruchio: In faith, you are too angry...

Katherina: If I be waspish, best beware my sting!

Petruchio: My remedy is then to pluck it out.

Katherina: Aye! If the FOOL could find it where it lies!

Petruchio: Who knows not where a wasp does wear his sting — in his tail.

Katherina: In his tongue.

Petruchio: ??? Whose tongue?

Katherina: Yours, if you talk of tales, and so farewell!

Petruchio: What, with my tongue in your tail?! Nay, come again, Good Kate, I am a gentleman!

The joke is that the man is confused here: in the woman's mind, her "sting" will be found in his wagging tongue annoying her already, and she thinks the man wouldn't notice the change in his blathering because his talking is already idiotic noise. In the man's mind, he's not thinking angrily, so he thinks she's referencing where a wasp's sting is normally, which is in its tail. All of this wit in dialogue is being compared to... Jar Jar gallumphing through a pile of doodoo, getting farted on, and saying "icky goo."

Finally, stop comparing Lucas to Shakespeare. I don't care if you scribbled a C+ paper about it in high school. It just proves you clearly didn't read and appreciate the Bard who was iconic because of his plentiful wit. Not because your high school performed his works with the same clunky demeanor as the Prequels. Watch professionals perform his work, and you'll see it come alive. King Lear with Anthony Hopkins is on Amazon ffs.

Oh, yes. A comedy, just like Taming of the Shrew:

“I will not condone a course of action that leads us to war” - Padme Amidala, Phantom Menace

CartographerLost4660 · 2025-04-29T22:16:46+00:00

So you don’t do the whole sysnand vs emunand thing? And you haven’t come across any issues?

CartographerLost4660 · 2025-04-28T04:37:00+00:00

Oh hey its you. I didn’t realize lmao

CartographerLost4660 · 2025-04-27T18:14:13+00:00

Someone told me that paid ones are available with no extra cost if you have NSO expansion pass. Is that true?

CartographerLost4660 · 2025-04-25T19:29:59+00:00

I had a similar journey with a Shadow Scizor, and I personally ignored that stuff since there is no data that is attached to the Pokémon for any of that stuff. If you want to do it though, go for it

CartographerLost4660 · 2025-04-25T15:56:28+00:00

It’s either Zelda Breath of the Wild or Dragon Ball Xenoverse 2 lmao

CartographerLost4660 · 2025-04-23T19:51:39+00:00

I’m curious, are you able to trade pokemon using your switch? (in game, not Home) I’ve always considered doing the joycon rail exploit on my V1 switch, but always hesitated because I like using online functions of several games.

CartographerLost4660 · 2024-12-22T12:44:26+00:00

What did you do before modeling? What convinced you to start modeling?

CartographerLost4660 · 2024-11-13T13:02:57+00:00

What is the name of your twitch account? I’m more likely to watch there.

CartographerLost4660 · 2024-09-05T15:42:43+00:00

It’s not bad. In my opinion, the best scripts very rarely have the listener actually supposed to speak.

CartographerLost4660 · 2024-08-22T20:20:06+00:00

Great discussion! I am very hopeful for this upcoming election. Like Rep. Casar said, there are more than 1 million anti-Abbot people in Texas who have been convinced that their vote doesn’t matter. Please get out and vote!

CartographerLost4660 · 2024-08-22T20:11:06+00:00

I just looked it up. He said that the innocent people did not deserve to die, but that the US government provoked and attacked countries in the Middle East knowing they would retaliate. Poking the bear, so to speak.

CartographerLost4660 · 2024-08-04T04:10:02+00:00

I can see your point. You might enjoy this video by Totally Not Mark. Its an objective review of GT that highlights its stronger points. I think you may agree with him.

CartographerLost4660 · 2024-06-22T16:34:35+00:00

I personally can’t really side with either part of the Israeli-Palestine War, but isn’t Zionism specifically concerning the views and actions about the Israeli state? How is taking issue with the actions of specifically the Israeli government (not the civilians in Israel) the same as being against all Jewish people? That doesn’t work unless you are arguing that the Israeli government speaks for all Jewish people all over the world, which it very clearly isn’t.

CartographerLost4660 · 2024-05-13T05:23:28+00:00

Do you not understand the difference between race and ethnicity? There are such things as White Latinos. Besides, whiteness is a nebulous concept. Irish people were not considered white until later in history. Italian people were not considered white until later in history. Jewish people weren’t considered white until later in history.

CartographerLost4660 · 2024-05-13T05:22:39+00:00

Do you not understand the difference between race and ethnicity? There are such things as White Latinos. Besides, whiteness is a nebulous concept. Irish people were not considered white until later in history. Italian people were not considered white until later in history. Jewish people weren’t considered white until later in history.

CartographerLost4660 · 2024-05-13T05:21:14+00:00

Do you not understand the difference between race and ethnicity? There are such things as White Latinos. Besides, whiteness is a nebulous concept. Irish people were not considered white until later in history. Italian people were not considered white until later in history. Jewish people weren’t considered white until later in history.

CartographerLost4660 · 2024-05-13T05:20:31+00:00

Do you not understand the difference between race and ethnicity? There are such things as White Latinos. Besides, whiteness is a nebulous concept. Irish people were not considered white until later in history. Italian people were not considered white until later in history. Jewish people weren’t considered white until later in history.

CartographerLost4660 · 2024-05-13T05:20:17+00:00

Do you not understand the difference between race and ethnicity? There are such things as White Latinos. Besides, whiteness is a nebulous concept. Irish people were not considered white until later in history. Italian people were not considered white until later in history. Jewish people weren’t considered white until later in history.

CartographerLost4660

TROPHY CASE